Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter
still seeing really slow download speeds. I then decided to see if something was wrong with the system by downloading the same image from the same source that I downloaded on linux in order to bootstrap freebsd and the speed difference was appaling. It had downloaded at 10.29 MB/s. Once freebsd was installed, It will only go at 60KB/s.. looks like problems with speed/duplex autoconfiguration with the switch, or bad support for PHY in FreeBSD. what you describe is quite common case when one side gets configured for full duplex, other for half duplex. as it works for linux, maybe PHY support in FreeBSD is buggy. try setting up speed and duplex options manually ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:21 AM To: David Polak Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter still seeing really slow download speeds. I then decided to see if something was wrong with the system by downloading the same image from the same source that I downloaded on linux in order to bootstrap freebsd and the speed difference was appaling. It had downloaded at 10.29 MB/s. Once freebsd was installed, It will only go at 60KB/s.. looks like problems with speed/duplex autoconfiguration with the switch, or bad support for PHY in FreeBSD. what you describe is quite common case when one side gets configured for full duplex, other for half duplex. as it works for linux, maybe PHY support in FreeBSD is buggy. try setting up speed and duplex options manually I have set the duplex to full-duplex and it has increased the speed to about 200kb/s on the same file. As far as phy support, I guess I really don't know, but the drivers for the chipset have been around for a while. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter
David Polak wrote: [snip] try setting up speed and duplex options manually I have set the duplex to full-duplex and it has increased the speed to about 200kb/s on the same file. As far as phy support, I guess I really don't know, but the drivers for the chipset have been around for a while. Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver should perform better. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter
Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver should perform better. Alternatively, to avoid involving the provider's tech support, could the OP get the same effect by building a kernel without USB? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE getting terrible throughput using sk0 adapter
Try disabling usb and firewire in BIOS. You may need to have a tech there do it for you. Your box has the sk NIC and usb sharing an irq. The NIC driver is MPSAFE but the usb stack is still under the GIANT lock. Disable usb and the NIC driver should perform better. Alternatively, to avoid involving the provider's tech support, could the OP get the same effect by building a kernel without USB? From server support live chat: Steven H. - Server Support: Submit a trouble ticket and we will look into it further. I'm pretty sure they will not disable usb since the DC technicians need to boot from USB in some cases. So is there any other way to verify that this is indeed the problem? Perhaps as Perry suggested, building a kernel without usb/firewire, or possibly setting the irq manually so it's not shared? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
