Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
Did you compile the access database? Typically done with: /usr/sbin/makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access -Derek At 08:54 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: צ×ÔÏÒÏË 28 ÂÅÒÅÚÅÎØ 2006 18:55, Derek Ragona ÎÁÐÉÓÁ×: Block that in /etc/mail/access instead, use this syntax: @example.comERROR:550 No spam, thanks Note the leading space and use of double quotes. Nope, that went back to saying User unknown instead of No spam... Thanks! -mi At 01:22 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi! I host a domain with a handful of real addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with No spam responses instead of User unknown. Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 08:39 am, Derek Ragona wrote: = Did you compile the access database? = = Typically done with: = /usr/sbin/makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access I run `make' in /etc/mail, which takes care of this. Thanks. -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:35 am, Glenn Dawson wrote: = I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only = problem was with getting the reject message to work properly. = = Anyway... = = This is what I typically do: = = [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount2 = @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here Glenn, this is exactly what I have according to my initial posting in this thread. I took the example from sendmail's cf/README: = Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: = = [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo = [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar = @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks Unfortunately, as I write in that initial posting, although it does have some effect, it does not seem sufficient: = I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog = (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is = no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other = software) and some of these messages seem to pass through = (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). = = For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam = message generates: = = Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks = Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] = = Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. = = What am I doing wrong? Thanks! Yours, -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
If your access db is not being used, your sendmail configuration is not setup to use that. -Derek At 08:12 AM 3/29/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Wednesday 29 March 2006 08:39 am, Derek Ragona wrote: = Did you compile the access database? = = Typically done with: = /usr/sbin/makemap hash /etc/mail/access /etc/mail/access I run `make' in /etc/mail, which takes care of this. Thanks. -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
Glenn Dawson wrote: [ ... ] This is what I typically do: [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount2 @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here Note that the order of the entries is important, the catch-all has to be at the end. Organizationally, I typically keep all the @bar.com type entries at the end of the file and group the others before those in whatever way makes the most sense. These files get turned into hash databases using makemap (ie, when you cd /etc/mail make all); the order of entries is not significant. What is significant is that the MTA will look up more specific entries before looking up general entries, so it will try looking up [EMAIL PROTECTED] before looking up example.com, so the more specific match will win. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
At 06:17 AM 3/29/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:35 am, Glenn Dawson wrote: = I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only = problem was with getting the reject message to work properly. = = Anyway... = = This is what I typically do: = = [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount1 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount2 = @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here Glenn, this is exactly what I have according to my initial posting in this thread. Exactly, which is why I didn't think there was a problem with most of it, as re-stated above, and now again, here. I took the example from sendmail's cf/README: = Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: = = [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo = [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar = @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks Unfortunately, as I write in that initial posting, although it does have some effect, it does not seem sufficient: = I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog = (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is = no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other = software) What does other software refer to in this case? and some of these messages seem to pass through = (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). = = For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam = message generates: = = Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks = Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] = = Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. I don't see anything in the log entries above to indicate that the message was accepted at all. What makes you think that it was? On a general note, you may want to include the delay_checks feature. That will allow sendmail to get most of the info about a message before seeing if it should be rejected or not. If nothing else it allows you to have more meaningful log info on rejected mail. -Glenn = = What am I doing wrong? Thanks! Yours, -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
середа 29 березень 2006 10:28, Glenn Dawson написав: = Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. I don't see anything in the log entries above to indicate that the message was accepted at all. What makes you think that it was? First, there was no rejection entry in the maillog. Second -- and most importantly -- I found this particular spam-message in the spam mailbox. Thanks, -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikhail Teterin Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect Hi! I host a domain with a handful of real addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with No spam responses instead of User unknown. Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! Your users that are getting SPAM are in a BCC field. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
Block that in /etc/mail/access instead, use this syntax: @example.comERROR:550 No spam, thanks Note the leading space and use of double quotes. -Derek At 01:22 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi! I host a domain with a handful of real addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with No spam responses instead of User unknown. Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
вівторок 28 березень 2006 18:55, Derek Ragona написав: Block that in /etc/mail/access instead, use this syntax: @example.comERROR:550 No spam, thanks Note the leading space and use of double quotes. Nope, that went back to saying User unknown instead of No spam... Thanks! -mi At 01:22 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi! I host a domain with a handful of real addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with No spam responses instead of User unknown. Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
At 06:54 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: צ×ÔÏÒÏË 28 ÂÅÒÅÚÅÎØ 2006 18:55, Derek Ragona ÎÁÐÉÓÁ×: Block that in /etc/mail/access instead, use this syntax: @example.comERROR:550 No spam, thanks Note the leading space and use of double quotes. Nope, that went back to saying User unknown instead of No spam... I use this in my virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] error:nouser 550 No such user here but you should be able to change the message half of that with no trouble. That generates the following in my sendmail logs: Mar 28 18:43:08 foo sendmail[11056]: k2T2g3Le011056: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No such user here Mar 28 18:43:11 foo sendmail[11056]: k2T2g3Le011056: lost input channel from 200-100-163-150.dial-up.telesp.net.br [200.100.163.150] to MTA after rcpt Mar 28 18:43:11 foo sendmail[11056]: k2T2g3Le011056: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=200-100-163-150.dial-up.telesp.net.br [200.100.163.150] -Glenn Thanks! -mi At 01:22 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi! I host a domain with a handful of real addresses. I noticed, that spammers are using a variety of random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such addresses with No spam responses instead of User unknown. Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: [EMAIL PROTECTED] foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]bar @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks I can see the No spam,thanks messages logged in the maillog (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other software) and some of these messages seem to pass through (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam message generates: Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: [EMAIL PROTECTED]... No spam,thanks Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] Despite the No spam,thanks the message was accepted. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 10:09 pm, Glenn Dawson wrote: = I use this in my virtusertable: = [EMAIL PROTECTED] error:nouser 550 No such user here = = but you should be able to change the message half of that with no trouble. Please, review this thread from the beginning. I want some of the foos to be accepted and forwarded, but all other @bar.com addresses to trigger a no-spam response. -mi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
At 09:26 PM 3/28/2006, Mikhail Teterin wrote: On Tuesday 28 March 2006 10:09 pm, Glenn Dawson wrote: = I use this in my virtusertable: = [EMAIL PROTECTED] error:nouser 550 No such user here = = but you should be able to change the message half of that with no trouble. Please, review this thread from the beginning. I want some of the foos to be accepted and forwarded, but all other @bar.com addresses to trigger a no-spam response. I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only problem was with getting the reject message to work properly. Anyway... This is what I typically do: [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] localaccount2 @bar.com error:nouser 550 No such user here Note that the order of the entries is important, the catch-all has to be at the end. Organizationally, I typically keep all the @bar.com type entries at the end of the file and group the others before those in whatever way makes the most sense. -Glenn -mi --- Go that way, really fast. If something gets in your way, turn. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
