Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade

2004-07-21 Thread /root/of/all/evil
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
 On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote:
 
 The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts 
 normally during
 system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add 
 them (I mean
 'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) 
 to the end of
 apache`s script, then they are starting..
 
 Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)?
 
 -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA

Yes, they all are executable - if I add them to the end of the only script
that is starting normally (wich i s apache2 in this case) they execute normally and
the deamons are starting. But leaving them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ just do nothing.
:(

Any ideas?
r.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade

2004-07-21 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote:
The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts
normally during
system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add
them (I mean
'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/)
to the end of
apache`s script, then they are starting..
Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)?
Yes, they all are executable - if I add them to the end of the only script
that is starting normally (wich i s apache2 in this case) they execute normally and
the deamons are starting. But leaving them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ just do nothing.
I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing.  Is the x 
executable bit set when you do an ls -l in /usr/local/etc/rc.d?

# ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d
-r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel635 Jun 15 05:58 apache.sh
   ^  ^  ^
Are these bits set for all of the scripts in the directory?
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade

2004-07-21 Thread /root/of/all/evil
 I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing.  Is the x 
 executable bit set when you do an ls -l in /usr/local/etc/rc.d?
 
 # ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d
 -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel635 Jun 15 05:58 apache.sh
^  ^  ^
 
 Are these bits set for all of the scripts in the directory?
 
 -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA

As I said - yes, they are:

(%:/usr/local/etc/rc.d)- ls -lCzwartek 06:24:23
total 18
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel50 23 Maj 14:42 000.compat4x.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   181 24 Cze 23:50 000.mysql-client.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   248 13 Lip 19:11 000.pkgtools.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1809 21 Lip 20:30 apache2.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   407 31 Maj 20:29 apache2.sh.orig
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   227  9 Lip 14:27 helix.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   549 24 Cze 23:41 mysql-server.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   550 24 Cze 13:48 oidentd.sh
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel   558 21 Lip 20:23 pure-ftpd.sh
([EMAIL PROTECTED])(110/ttyp0)(06:24P:07/22/04)-
(%:/usr/local/etc/rc.d)-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]