Re: Upgrading to 60 question.

2005-11-29 Thread Vizion
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the dialogue on- Re: Upgrading to 60 question.: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: The ports will continue to work, but you should update them when you get a chance so that they link against the 6.0

Re: Upgrading to 60 question.

2005-11-29 Thread RW
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the dialogue on- Re: Upgrading to 60 question.: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 14:01, Lowell Gilbert wrote: The ports will continue to work, but you should update them when you

Re: Upgrading to 60 question.

2005-11-29 Thread Vizion
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:02, the author RW contributed to the dialogue on- Re: Upgrading to 60 question.: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 18:53, Vizion wrote: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 07:16, the author RW contributed to the dialogue on- Re: Upgrading to 60 question.: On Tuesday 29

Re: Upgrading to pgsql 8.1 via ports

2005-11-25 Thread Francisco Reyes
Pat Maddox writes: Should I use postgresql81-server now instead? Yes. What do I need to do in order to upgrade my system to use pgsql 8.1? I believe you need to go a pg_dumpall all to copy data. Also keep a copy of your postgresql.conf and pg_hba.conf If you don't have any

Re: Upgrading glib

2005-11-19 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Paul Waring [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've just done a cvsup on the following release: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4 Ports aren't branched, so I'll assume you used tag=. for the ports. and one of the packages due for an update is glib, which has gone from version 2.8.3 to 2.8.4.

Re: Upgrading application(s)

2005-11-12 Thread Sasa Stupar
--On 11. november 2005 13:15 -0500 Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 11, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Sasa Stupar wrote: I am quite new to freebsd. I have several applications build from the ports collection. When some port change for a new version (I cvsup my ports collection) how do I

Re: Upgrading to 6.0 - Would this backup strategy work?

2005-11-11 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Richard Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm thinking of upgrading my 5.4 box to 6.0 mainly becuase I've never done a buildworld I've always installed a fresh. The box is not production quality just something for me to learn BSD on. I have a 7006-2 3ware raid controller miroring on 2

Re: Upgrading PHP port to 4.4.1 breaks Drupal site

2005-11-11 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 11 November 2005 08:30, Ron Wilhoite wrote: After a portupgrade of PHP to 4.4.1 my Drupal 4.6.3 site stopped working. I used portdowngrade to revert to 4.4.0 and the site worked again. After upgrading PHP to 4.4.1 you should rebuild ports that depend on it. -Mike I tried

Re: Upgrading to pgsql 8.1 via ports

2005-11-11 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So PostgreSQL 8.1 was released a few days ago, and I was looking forward to upgrading to it. Figured it might take a day or two before the changes were made in ports, and was surprised to see that my postgresql packages are still up to date. The packages

Re: Upgrading PHP port to 4.4.1 breaks Drupal site

2005-11-11 Thread Ron Wilhoite
Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Friday 11 November 2005 08:30, Ron Wilhoite wrote: After a portupgrade of PHP to 4.4.1 my Drupal 4.6.3 site stopped working. I used portdowngrade to revert to 4.4.0 and the site worked again. After upgrading PHP to 4.4.1 you should rebuild ports that depend on it.

Re: Upgrading PHP port to 4.4.1 breaks Drupal site

2005-11-11 Thread Richard Morse
This is a known bug with PHP4-4.4.1 and Apache2+mod_rewrite. Please see http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=35096. Ricky On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ron Wilhoite wrote: After a portupgrade of PHP to 4.4.1 my Drupal 4.6.3 site stopped working. I used portdowngrade to revert to 4.4.0 and the

Re: Upgrading application(s)

2005-11-11 Thread Charles Swiger
On Nov 11, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Sasa Stupar wrote: I am quite new to freebsd. I have several applications build from the ports collection. When some port change for a new version (I cvsup my ports collection) how do I do upgrade of that application? Is it the same as for the first time: just

Re: Upgrading application(s)

2005-11-11 Thread Micah
Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I am quite new to freebsd. I have several applications build from the ports collection. When some port change for a new version (I cvsup my ports collection) how do I do upgrade of that application? Is it the same as for the first time: just go to the port I want and

Re: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-03 Thread Krzysztof Nakielski
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:07:25PM +, Chris Howells wrote: Hi, I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Has

RE: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-03 Thread Steve Bertrand
Oddly enough, and a little OT, (but semi-within the topic) I'm trying to update a 5.0 box to RELENG_5 right now with several different errors, too many to mention (generally they occur after rebooting after my installkernel. I can subsequently reboot off of kernel.old, as always).

Re: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:07:25PM +, Chris Howells wrote: Hi, I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Has

Re: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-02 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:07:25PM +, Chris Howells wrote: Hi, I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Has

Re: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-02 Thread Chris
Chris Howells wrote: Hi, I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Has anybody done this recently. Were there any

RE: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-02 Thread Steve Bertrand
I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Oddly enough, and a little OT, (but semi-within the topic) I'm trying

Re: Upgrading 4.11-STABLE to 5.4-STABLE

2005-11-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
Steve Bertrand wrote: I want to upgrade my 4.11-STABLE server to 5.4-STABLE. I'm very used to using cvsup to upgrade between minor releases (IIRC the box was 4.9 or 4.10 originally) but a jump between major versions is scaring me a bit :) Oddly enough, and a little OT, (but semi-within the

Re: Upgrading from 5.3 to 6.0 (was: no subject)

2005-10-27 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/27/05, George Katsanos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello , Since the actual 6.0 Release is taking too long , would you suggest me installing 6.0 RC-1 and then then 6.0 is out , can I just apply some patches , or I should Re-makeworld everything?... And another question , I'm on a PIII

Re: Upgrading to freebsd 5.4 STABLE from 5.3 kernel panic, what do i do to get data back?

2005-10-13 Thread Enrique Ayesta Perojo
El Osteguna 13 Urria 2005 14:49, Alex escribió: Hello list! I have been successfully been running 5.3 for a couple of weeks when i decided i should upgrade to 5.4 stable. Now the make world went fine except mergemaster complaining it couldn't find usr/src/etc or something similar. I made

Re: upgrading

2005-09-29 Thread Andrew P.
On 9/29/05, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 Sep 2005, at 21:46, Beecher Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:28 pm, eoghan wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to

Re: upgrading

2005-09-28 Thread Mike Hernandez
On 9/28/05, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. Why would you want to do

Re: upgrading

2005-09-28 Thread Beecher Rintoul
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:28 pm, eoghan wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on having my trusty dvd with me. So, the question

Re: upgrading

2005-09-28 Thread eoghan
On 28 Sep 2005, at 21:46, Beecher Rintoul wrote: On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:28 pm, eoghan wrote: Hello Im going to do a fresh install of 5.3 over the weekend, then id like to upgrade to 5.4. My reasons for upgrading are: ill have to do it some time or another and I cant always rely on

Re: Upgrading mysql 4.0 to 4.1

2005-09-22 Thread Erik Norgaard
Roger Merritt wrote: I want to upgrade mysql from ver. 4.0.26 to 4.1.x but am daunted by the existence of the separate ports. Can I just run portinstall -R mysql41-\* or should I do pkgdeinstall mysql40-\* first? mysql client 4.1 cannot connect to server 4.0 (and AFAIK, nor can client 4.0

Re: Upgrading mysql 4.0 to 4.1

2005-09-22 Thread martin hudec
Hello, On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:40:32AM +0200 or thereabouts, Erik Norgaard wrote: mysql client 4.1 cannot connect to server 4.0 (and AFAIK, nor can client 4.0 connect to server 4.1) which justifies the existence of separate ports. Actually mysql 4.1 client is able to connect to mysql

Re: Upgrading mysql 4.0 to 4.1

2005-09-22 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:05:31 +0700, Roger Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Upgrading mysql 4.0 to 4.1 Wrote these words of wisdom: I want to upgrade mysql from ver. 4.0.26 to 4.1.x but am daunted by the existence of the separate ports. Can I just run portinstall -R mysql41-\* or should I

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-09-01 Thread Jorn Argelo
Zan wrote: uname -m = i386 which -a perl = /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl Please show: uname -m which -a perl On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Zan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-09-01 Thread Parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Jorn Argelo thusly... About your problem, you should really recompile Perl from the ports-tree if you want to upgrade your Perl version. And after you did that, I always rebooted the machine. I don't know how it will function without rebooting the machine,

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-09-01 Thread Jorn Argelo
Parv wrote: in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Jorn Argelo thusly... About your problem, you should really recompile Perl from the ports-tree if you want to upgrade your Perl version. And after you did that, I always rebooted the machine. I don't know how it will function without rebooting

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-08-31 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Please don't top-post. Zan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Zan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl -v' I see that

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
Zan wrote: Hello, Would you please help me? in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl -v' I see that I'm running off of 5.0. 5.8 is from ports. 5.0.6. i think, is system based Is there anything else I can do

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-08-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Zan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of perl (5.8.0) already there, but when I type 'perl -v' I see that I'm running off of 5.0. Is there anything else I can do besides trying the use.perl port command? Because that doesn't seem to

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-08-30 Thread Zan
uname -m = i386 which -a perl = /usr/local/bin/perl /usr/bin/perl Please show: uname -m which -a perl On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 01:30 P:M, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Zan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in my /usr/local/bin I can clearly see that there is a newer version of perl (5.8.0)

Re: upgrading perl -ports

2005-08-30 Thread Norberto Meijome
Zan wrote: 5.8 is from ports. 5.0.6. i think, is system based In my 'usr/local/BIN' perl5.8.0 already exists. ok you need to install the perl from ports before using use.perl port. What I want to know is how to switch to 5.8.0 WITHOUT using use.perl port because I already tried that,

Re: Upgrading GNOME

2005-07-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Jahnke wrote: | I am upgrading Gnome from 2.4 to 2.10 with a clean install (I have | backups) as part of an upgrade from FreeBSD 5.2.1 to the 6.0 Beta (which | is working well, btw). I would like to preserve various settings from | my old

Re: Upgrading GNOME

2005-07-27 Thread Frank Jahnke
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:51, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: | | The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to | 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original | locations showed that both Epiphany and Evolution did not recognize | them. If there is a

Re: Upgrading GNOME

2005-07-27 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Jahnke wrote: | On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:51, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: | | || || The upgrade is from Epiphany 1.4 to 2.2; Evolution is from 1.0.6 to || 1.6.0. A simple-minded copying of the old files into their original || locations showed that

Re: upgrading from 5.4-RELEASE-p4 to 5.4-RELEASE-p5

2005-07-22 Thread lars
Louis LeBlanc wrote: There was a new security announcement a couple days ago regarding the devfs subsystem in FreeBSD. The announcement is here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:17.devfs.asc My question is regarding the upgrade and patch description. I am

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-28 Thread RW
On Monday 27 June 2005 17:37, Denny White wrote: On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, RW wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? AFAIK there is no

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-28 Thread Denny White
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, RW wrote: On Monday 27 June 2005 17:37, Denny White wrote: On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, RW wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way?

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread RW
On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? AFAIK there is no difference between the two; -a means upgrade all ports in the package database, -Rr

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread Nikolas Britton
Is there a way to do all of this with packages, I've used ports system exclusively? The reason I ask is... well I don't like waiting 2 to 3 days for everything to rebuild and I take the defaults for most programs anyways. if I could do that and then just rebuild the apps I want with custom flags

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread RW
On Monday 27 June 2005 16:39, Nikolas Britton wrote: Is there a way to do all of this with packages, I've used ports system exclusively? The reason I ask is... well I don't like waiting 2 to 3 days for everything to rebuild and I take the defaults for most programs anyways. if I could do that

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread Denny White
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, RW wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 12:22, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? AFAIK there is no

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 6/27/05, Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: This couldn't have come at a better time for me. I really boned things up about 40 hours ago. I was getting ready to leave and because I'd

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-27 Thread Denny White
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: On 6/27/05, Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: This couldn't have come at a better time for me. I

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread Erik Nørgaard
Kirk Strauser wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 06:36 am, Erik Nørgaard wrote: It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from ground up. And it is far more secure in not screwing up. On toy systems, maybe. I've got 654 ports installed on the machine I'm typing this on,

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread P.U.Kruppa
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? I hesitate and don't want to screw up my machine. # portupgrade -a works fine, if you do it regularily, i.e.

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Sunday 26 June 2005 06:28 am, you wrote: We are talking about upgrading the entire system, not just a few ports. It really depends on how often you upgrade. If more than once a year or so, I maintain that portupgrade -a is faster than the OpenBSD-style uninstall and reinstlal process.

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread Erik Nørgaard
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Erik Nørgaard wrote: portupgrade isn't suitable for upgrading the entire machine, even though you do recursive and Recursive. What, in your opinion, makes it unsuitable? I've used portugrade exclusively and never had trouble. Unsuitable if - it is slower than the

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread Nikolas Britton
On 6/25/05, Erik Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: portupgrade isn't suitable for upgrading the entire machine, even though you do recursive and Recursive. It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from ground up. And it is far more secure in not screwing up. I

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-26 Thread P.U.Kruppa
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Nikolas Britton wrote: On 6/25/05, Erik Nørgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: portupgrade isn't suitable for upgrading the entire machine, even though you do recursive and Recursive. It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from ground up. And it is far

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:22:56 +0200 Dick Hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? I hesitate and don't want to screw up my machine. do you want to upgrade all

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-25 Thread Erik Nørgaard
Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I want to do a portupgrade on all installed ports. What's the right way? portupgrade -arR ? or portupgrade -a ? I hesitate and don't want to screw up my machine. portupgrade isn't suitable for upgrading the entire machine, even though you do

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-25 Thread Kirk Strauser
On Saturday 25 June 2005 06:36 am, Erik Nørgaard wrote: It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from ground up. And it is far more secure in not screwing up. On toy systems, maybe. I've got 654 ports installed on the machine I'm typing this on, and I assure you that

Re: upgrading all ports

2005-06-25 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 25 Jun Kirk Strauser wrote: On Saturday 25 June 2005 06:36 am, Erik Nørgaard wrote: It is much faster to deinstall everything and then installing from ground up. And it is far more secure in not screwing up. On toy systems, maybe. I've got 654 ports installed on the machine I'm

Re: Upgrading 5.3 to 5.4

2005-06-21 Thread Toni Schmidbauer
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 06:00:34PM -0600, Cartoon Factory wrote: I am a fairly novice user of FreeBSD. I just recently built two boxes with 5.3, and now that 5.4 is out, I was curious how easy it would be to upgrade. The Migration guide deals with 4.X = 5... do I essentially follow the Source

Re: Upgrading MySQL Without Wrecking Bacula

2005-06-11 Thread Drew Tomlinson
On 6/10/2005 10:25 PM Kevin Kinsey wrote: Drew Tomlinson wrote: I am a total noob regarding MySQL. I have version 3.23 installed on my 4.10 system. The only thing it's been used for and by is Bacula. I have never used it directly. But now I have reason to learn MySQL and feel it would

Re: Upgrading MySQL Without Wrecking Bacula

2005-06-10 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Drew Tomlinson wrote: I am a total noob regarding MySQL. I have version 3.23 installed on my 4.10 system. The only thing it's been used for and by is Bacula. I have never used it directly. But now I have reason to learn MySQL and feel it would be appropriate to start with a newer

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4

2005-05-23 Thread olivier . certner
Has anybody done this yet? Any gotcha's, or is it a fairly smooth upgrade? Hi! Yes, I've done that a week ago, and everything went well. You only have to be careful with your compile options (in /etc/make.conf) if you have increased the optimization level for compiling ports (don't use

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4

2005-05-23 Thread Tony Shadwick
I can confirm here as well, went very smoothly on all counts. Tony On Mon, 23 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anybody done this yet? Any gotcha's, or is it a fairly smooth upgrade? Hi! Yes, I've done that a week ago, and everything went well. You only have to be careful with

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4

2005-05-23 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Duane Winner wrote: Has anybody done this yet? Any gotcha's, or is it a fairly smooth upgrade? It was a piece of cake to me. YMMV, as always :) bye av. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4

2005-05-23 Thread Vizion
On Monday 23 May 2005 09:01, the author Andrea Venturoli contributed to the dialogue on Re: upgrading from 5.3 to 5.4: Duane Winner wrote: Has anybody done this yet? Any gotcha's, or is it a fairly smooth upgrade? It was a piece of cake to me. YMMV, as always :) I have held off from 5.3

Re: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3

2005-05-18 Thread Francisco Reyes
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Merritt wrote: /usr/ports/UPDATING. Does anyone have any gotchas I should be aware of? You running 4.X or 5.X One FreeBSD gotach I recall was the need to have samba_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf As for Samba... I think there was one (maybe two) options in smb.conf which

Re: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3

2005-05-18 Thread Joerg Pulz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 May 2005, Roger Merritt wrote: I've just become aware that samba.org is no longer supporting Samba 2 (which has served me well for so long) and I should upgrade to Samba 3, which is now the stable version. I don't find any warnings about

RE: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3

2005-05-18 Thread Konrad Heuer
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: It's great if you like your server applications to be twice as complicated as before. Seriously, though, you can turn off all the fru-fru and set it up pretty much equivalent to a samba 2 server. The fru-fru is needed if you have a lot of XP

RE: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3

2005-05-18 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joerg Pulz Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:47 PM To: Roger Merritt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

RE: Upgrading from Samba 2 to Samba 3

2005-05-17 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
It's great if you like your server applications to be twice as complicated as before. Seriously, though, you can turn off all the fru-fru and set it up pretty much equivalent to a samba 2 server. The fru-fru is needed if you have a lot of XP stuff and you want to interoperate with a Microsoft

Re: upgrading net-snmp-5.2.1 gives error

2005-04-30 Thread Ian Moore
On Monday 28 March 2005 08:01, gustaaf wijnands wrote: Thomas Foster wrote: Does it compile WITH_PERL=NO ? It doesn't compile WITHOUT_PERL=yes what version of autoconf and libtool are you using? pkg_info |grep autoconf autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many

Re: Upgrading from 5.3-RELEASE-p5 to p6

2005-03-29 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Monday 28 March 2005 16:46, you wrote: I just upgraded a test machine from 5.3-RELEASE-p5 to 5.3-RELEASE-p6. The make buildworld went fine. When I tried to make buildkernel it kept saying that: kernel build for GENERIC complete on xx.xx.xx time I tried using the old way of bulding a

Re: Upgrading from 5.3-RELEASE-p5 to p6

2005-03-28 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:46:31PM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: I just upgraded a test machine from 5.3-RELEASE-p5 to 5.3-RELEASE-p6. The make buildworld went fine. When I tried to make buildkernel it kept saying that: kernel build for GENERIC complete on xx.xx.xx time I tried using the

Re: upgrading net-snmp-5.2.1 gives error

2005-03-27 Thread Thomas Foster
Does it compile WITH_PERL=NO ? what version of autoconf and libtool are you using? and perl -v returns what version? what happens after running ldconfig -R T - Original Message - From: gustaaf wijnands [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 1:35

Re: upgrading net-snmp-5.2.1 gives error

2005-03-27 Thread gustaaf wijnands
Thomas Foster wrote: Does it compile WITH_PERL=NO ? It doesn't compile WITHOUT_PERL=yes what version of autoconf and libtool are you using? pkg_info |grep autoconf autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.59_2 Automatically configure source

Re: Upgrading to 4.10-STABLE

2005-03-16 Thread Xin LI
[redirected to questions@ since this is not -net stuff] Hi, Julius, 2005-03-16 17:01 +0300Julius Kidubuka Hi all, I am trying to upgrade from 4.10-RELEASE to 4.10-STABLE and I have gone through the following steps; 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERN 3. make

Re: Upgrading perl 5.8

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel Bye
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:34:30PM +0100, Stefan Cars wrote: Hi! I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the @INC changed and

Re: Upgrading perl 5.8

2005-02-28 Thread Erik Norgaard
Stefan Cars wrote: Hi! I'm upgrading perl 5.8 from the ports on a FreeBSD 5.3 machine, the problem is that alot of my installed modules doesn't work after the update (just a minor update from 5.8.2 to 5.8.6), probably becuase the @INC changed and did not include the mach directory of 5.8.2. Is

RE: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64

2005-02-27 Thread Subhro
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 23:06 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64 I'm thinking about upgrading my hardware from an Intel P3 to

Re: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64

2005-02-27 Thread RW
On Sunday 27 February 2005 17:49, Subhro wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 23:06 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64 I'm

RE: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64

2005-02-27 Thread Subhro
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 23:29 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64 On Sunday 27 February 2005 17:49, Subhro wrote

Re: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64

2005-02-27 Thread RW
On Sunday 27 February 2005 18:12, Subhro wrote: As I said, I'm recompiling for 686 (which I think is pentium pro), my undestanding is that the AMD 64 is back-compatible to 686. Negative. AFAIK there are incompatible in both the ways. I found this thread:

Re: Upgrading hardware from P3 to AMD 64

2005-02-27 Thread Jason Henson
On 02/27/05 12:36:04, RW wrote: I'm thinking about upgrading my hardware from an Intel P3 to an AMD 64, and replacing the graphics card, without buying a new hard disk. Has anyone done this kind of thing successfully? I've recompiled kernel+world for 686 and I've done a portupgrade -fR on cvsup

Re: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-18 Thread Simon Barner
windlamf wrote: Thanks! If I specify the parameter of tag as RELENG_4, then does cvsup only fetch the latest source code of my current system version? Well, RELENG_4 a.k.a. FreeBSD 4-stable is FreeBSD 4.11 (the latest release) + security fixes + bug fixes or small backports from the -current

Re: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-17 Thread Roberto Nunnari
windlamf wrote: Hi all ! The version of my current system is 4.7, and I want to upgrade the system to 4.11.From the description of UPDATING in /usr/src, I know that I have alternatives among severval stable versions. But how can I specify the right version which I want the system upgraded

Re: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-17 Thread Simon Barner
windlamf wrote: Hi all ! The version of my current system is 4.7, and I want to upgrade the system to 4.11.From the description of UPDATING in /usr/src, I know that I have alternatives among severval stable versions. But how can I specify the right version which I want the system upgraded

RE: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-17 Thread Robert Kim, EVDO-Coverage, Verizon Agent
: Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:30 AM To: windlamf Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading to a specified version? windlamf wrote: Hi all ! The version of my current system is 4.7, and I want to upgrade the system to 4.11.From the description of UPDATING in /usr/src, I know that I

Re: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-17 Thread windlamf
Thanks! If I specify the parameter of tag as RELENG_4, then does cvsup only fetch the latest source code of my current system version? Andy Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: windlamf wrote: Hi all ! The version of my current system is 4.7, and I want to upgrade the system to

Re: Upgrading to 5.3

2005-02-17 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:18 pm, Joachim Dagerot wrote: I just cvsuped to freebsd-stable and buildworld. No problems. Now I want to build the kernel with the same conf as I used for the last years (5.x), but I ran into problems. device pcm is unknown. Is this a 'common' problem, or am

Re: Upgrading to 5.3

2005-02-17 Thread Joachim Dagerot
On 2005-02-18 Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:18 pm, Joachim Dagerot wrote: I just cvsuped to freebsd-stable and buildworld. No problems. Now I want to build the kernel with the same conf as I used for the last years (5.x), but I ran into problems. device pcm is

Re: upgrading FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
I was wondering if it is possible to upgrade from FreeBSD 3.2 to 5.3 without doing a fresh install, and if possible what issues might I have. It might be possible, but it may be less effort to just do the fresh install. You would have to do several stages of upgrades. I don't know anyone

Re: upgrading FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:13:11AM -0500, Greg Foster wrote: I was wondering if it is possible to upgrade from FreeBSD 3.2 to 5.3 without doing a fresh install, and if possible what issues might I have. Possible: Yes. Recommended: Absolutely not! You will almost certainly have to do it in

Re: upgrading FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 02 Feb Erik Trulsson wrote: The sequence backup all data make a fresh install of 5.3 restore data from backup will almost certainly be quicker, simpler, and less prone to catastrophic failure. (Making a backup of all important data is a *very* good idea anyway.) You're so right ;-)

Re: upgrading FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
Dick Hoogendijk wrote: [ ... ] You're so right ;-) Main problem (at least to me) is almost everytime *what* is important data and what is not? I don't mean my personal stuff (that's the easy part), but more, which control files and (fine) tunings on the running system do I not want to loose? /etc

Re: upgrading FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:49:23PM +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: You're so right ;-) Main problem (at least to me) is almost everytime *what* is important data and what is not? I don't mean my personal stuff (that's the easy part), but more, which control files and (fine) tunings on the

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to current

2005-01-16 Thread Reko Turja
This is rather a nubee question.. I am used to OBSD and how to update my sources...but seem to be missing something with FREEBSD. I installed 5.3 release and all I want to do now is update the source files on the disk to current. Very easy, all explained in the handbook. If on Intel, cvsup is

Re: upgrading from 5.3 to current

2005-01-16 Thread J.D. Bronson
At 08:06 AM 1/16/2005, Reko Turja wrote: This is rather a nubee question.. I am used to OBSD and how to update my sources...but seem to be missing something with FREEBSD. I installed 5.3 release and all I want to do now is update the source files on the disk to current. Very easy, all

Re: upgrading perl

2004-12-31 Thread Erik Norgaard
Karl Agee wrote: Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since 5.6.x some of the features arent in this older version. I am

Re: upgrading perl

2004-12-31 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, December 30, 2004 7:54 PM -0800 Karl Agee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freebsd 4.11-pre. I am working on learning perl, and have perl 5.00x that is in the base system when I installed 4.10-Release. Since most of the learning materials out there are based on later verisions esp since

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >