On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:10:38PM -0800, Paul D. Schmidt wrote:
Where can I find more information about the following? (Taken
from /usr/ports/CHANGES)
20040204:
...
The ports system now supports MySQL 3.23, 4.0, 4.1, and 5.0.
Also, the ability to scale to newer versions was also
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:33:34AM -0500, Crucial Servers wrote:
Hi,
I need some advice on steps for upgrading a very valueble
machine. This machine has an uptime of 393 days. I need to install a
secure version of curl this is our main focus right now. FreeBSD
3.5 ports collection is very
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:33:34 -0500
Crucial Servers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need some advice on steps for upgrading a very valueble
machine. This machine has an uptime of 393 days. I need to
install a secure version of curl this is our main focus right
now. FreeBSD
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD 3.5
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:33:34 -0500
Crucial Servers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need some advice on steps for upgrading a very valueble
machine. This machine has an uptime of 393 days. I need
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 03:06:19PM -0500, Crucial Servers wrote:
I wish this was an option for me but the contracted machine is in CW's
network operation center, not mine. I have no access to there machine
besides remote root.
It's going to be pretty dangerous to update, then. You need some
Updated the boxes sources from 4.7 to 5.2.1 Release. I'm running a
GENERIC kernel. When I do a make buildworld, I get the following error
message:
--
stage 4.1: building includes
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:28:25PM -0600, Ray Seals wrote:
I have a 4.7 machine that I installed the 5.2.1 sources on (ie. copied
the /usr/src directory from a fresh installed 5.2.1 machine).
When I do a make buildworld I get an error about no target to make
when it starts stage 4.1
At 09:49 PM 2/29/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmake[1]:Leaving directory '/usr/ports/x11/kdelib3/work/kdelibs-3.2.0'
gmake:*** [all] Erorr2
***Error code 2
Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3
I am runing FreeBSD 4.9
Well I got a bit farther than you did, got kdelibs-3.2.0 built but it fails
later
On Sunday 29 February 2004 10:40 pm, Chuck McManis wrote:
At 09:49 PM 2/29/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gmake[1]:Leaving directory
'/usr/ports/x11/kdelib3/work/kdelibs-3.2.0' gmake:*** [all] Erorr2
***Error code 2
Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdelibs3
I am runing FreeBSD 4.9
Well I got a
Ryan Thompson wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote to FreeBSD-Questions:
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE soon. My understanding
is that once you have built the world with buildworld, it's time to
build and install the new kernel.
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want to
On Wed November 26 2003 23:41, Dragoncrest wrote:
Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and does as good a
job as mergemaster with less thinking involved on the part of the user. :)
At 12:43 AM 11/20/03
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Christer Solskogen wrote:
I was wondering upgrading the mysql ports to 4.x series. should this be
okay?
gallery-1.4.1 ,p5-Mysql-modules-1.2219, php4-4.3.4_5, phpMyAdmin-2.5.4,
phpSysInfo-2.1 and squirrelmail-1.4.2_1 seems to like mysql-3, and i was
wondering if these
On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:51 am, Christer Solskogen wrote:
It seems like some port i want to install depend on mysql4, but i have
some programs that depends on mysql-client-3.23.58_1 ( I also have
mysql-server-3.23.58_1 installed)
I was wondering upgrading the mysql ports to 4.x series.
On Thursday 22 January 2004 10:51 am, Christer Solskogen wrote:
It seems like some port i want to install depend on mysql4, but i have
some programs that depends on mysql-client-3.23.58_1 ( I also have
mysql-server-3.23.58_1 installed)
I was wondering upgrading the mysql ports to 4.x series.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 05:51:52PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
It seems like some port i want to install depend on mysql4, but i have
some programs that depends on mysql-client-3.23.58_1 ( I also have
mysql-server-3.23.58_1 installed)
I was wondering upgrading the mysql ports to 4.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 02:32 pm, David LeCount wrote:
I have what is proving to be a difficult challenge. My
friend wants to start using FreeBSD. Unfortunately the
latest disc I have is 4.3, and I don't have easy
access to broadband, so
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:32:16PM -0800, David LeCount wrote:
I have what is proving to be a difficult challenge. My
friend wants to start using FreeBSD. Unfortunately the
latest disc I have is 4.3, and I don't have easy
access to broadband, so obtaining a newer iso is
unlikely in the near
dave wrote:
Hello,
If this is a repeat message i apologize as i've been having email issues
lately.
I've got two machines, both running 5.1 release. I'd like to do an
update on both of them to 5.2, and either current or stable. One machine is
significantly faster than the other so i'd like
Hello,
If this is a repeat message i apologize as i've been having email
issues
lately.
I've got two machines, both running 5.1 release. I'd like to do an
update on both of them to 5.2, and either current or stable. One machine
is
significantly faster than the other so i'd like to do all
portupgrade :p5-
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:55:17PM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all* installed
perl modules. It went something like:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
Roger Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all*
installed perl modules. It went something like:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
anyone tell me the proper command?
That one
At 01:41 AM 12/23/03, you wrote:
Roger Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I once saw, and used, a portupgrade command line to upgrade *all*
installed perl modules. It went something like:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
anyone tell me
At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
anyone
tell me the proper command?
#portupgrade p5-* (as root)
That gives me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# portupgrade p5-*
portupgrade: No match.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]#
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:42:53AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error message. Can
anyone
tell me the proper command?
#portupgrade p5-* (as root)
That gives me:
[EMAIL
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Jez Hancock
thusly...
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 07:42:53AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
At 08:48 PM 12/22/03, you wrote:
$ portupgrade p5-\*
However, when I try the command now I just get an error
message. Can anyone tell me the proper command?
If it is your second buildworld you have to do something like this
# cd /usr/obj
# chflags -R noschg *
# rm -rf *
Or the build may fail.
See
http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
Pete
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:36:43 -0500, Marius Kirschner wrote
I
This will be the first buildworld on that machine. Thanks,
---Marius
-Original Message-
From: Pete Renshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Marius Kirschner
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrading
If it is your second buildworld
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:36:43PM -0500, Marius Kirschner wrote:
I need to upgrade my 4.3 box, but haven't done so in a long time. Is the
below still valid?
The upgrade procedure is documented in the handbook and in
/usr/src/UPDATING. Your list omitted a few things.
Kris
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Dragoncrest wrote:
Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and
does as good a job as mergemaster with less thinking involved
on the part of the user. :)
Confusion!
Mergemaster is definately one way to do it, but I prefer
Portupgrade. It's much simpler as far as I'm concerned and does as good a
job as mergemaster with less thinking involved on the part of the user. :)
Just CVsup your ports, then do portupgrade -r -all, then walk
away and
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:13:29AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
is there a method (other than de-installing all pkgs and reisntalling)
to upgrade the ports or packages appropriately from 4.8 to 4.9?
Not quite sure I fully understand, but you might want to take a look at
portupgrade
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:24 am, Lewis Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:13:29AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
is there a method (other than de-installing all pkgs and reisntalling)
to upgrade the ports or packages appropriately from 4.8 to 4.9?
Not quite sure I fully understand,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:27:59AM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
if I upgrade from 4.8 to 4.9, will I also have to upgrade (by whatever
method) the applications running on the box? I.e. those that are not
part of the src tree?
On the whole... no. But that doesn't mean you won't run into
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:14:31AM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
Whats the best way to ensure that all perl modules are properly and
automatically upgrade when perl itself is upgraded?
I've since discovered that I can shorten the time somewhat by using
`pkg_info -R perl-5.6.1_14` and then
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:24:02AM -0700, Robert Stickney wrote:
I am looking to use PCB for a school project. The current version of PCB in
the ports is 1.7.3. The version on Sorceforge is 2.0 with many new features
that would help me in my project. Is there any body else interested in
Robert H. Perry wrote to FreeBSD-Questions:
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE soon. My understanding
is that once you have built the world with buildworld, it's time to
build and install the new kernel.
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want to build a new kernel. In
fact,
Robert H. Perry wrote to Ryan Thompson:
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want to build a new kernel.
In fact, I hope you elected to go with the security branch
(RELENG_4_8), so that you get the 13 or so security related fixes
that have been applied since 4.8 was released.
Hadn't
Ryan Thompson wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote to Ryan Thompson:
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want to build a new kernel.
In fact, I hope you elected to go with the security branch
(RELENG_4_8), so that you get the 13 or so security related fixes
that have been applied since 4.8 was
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:16:50PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade X by installing it from Ports,
and thought I had succeeded, as pkg_info and so forth are
reporting that XFree86-4.3.0,1 is
On 2003-10-15 13:09, bas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am thinking of upgrading my base sendmail 8.12.8 (the one that came
with FreeBSD 4.8) to the one in the ports collection , which is now
8.12.10. mainly because there are some security issues from 8.12.8 and
i thought upgrading the whole thing
Ewald Jenisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems like I'm running into a problem upgrading my 5.1 machine to the
latest level:
If you're going to run -CURRENT, you really do have to follow the
-CURRENT mailing list.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
Noah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
okay I jsut installed sendmail-8.12.10 from /usr/ports the other day. and I
try to start version 8.12.10 but 8.12.9 still gets executed. this is really
strange?
Did you adjust mailer.conf(5)?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
mergemaster will take care of /etc. But how about the other configuration files?,
Could you please tell me where i can find proper documentation for upgrading
freebsd4.5 to 4.8.
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:13:59AM -0700,
Naveen Glore wrote:
Hi,
I have a freeBSD 4.5-Release server. I could not find any packages
available for 4.5 version at freebsd ftp site. So i decided to
upgrade it to FreeBSD 4.8-Release. Can i upgrade the server without
any change in its current configuration.
Since you did not post your current
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:13:59AM -0700, Naveen Glore wrote:
Hello all,
I have a freeBSD 4.5-Release server. I could not find any packages available for 4.5
version at freebsd ftp site. So i decided to upgrade it to FreeBSD 4.8-Release. Can
i upgrade the server without any change in its
What I got was 4.9 prerelease. With this version I can't use
/stand/sysinstall to install software. It keeps telling me that the FTP
server doesn't have the ports for 4.9. The ports in /usr/ports work fine
but it would be nice to use /stand/sysinstall.
Why use sysinstall for this? Why not
-
Adam McLaurin adam.mclaurin at gmx.net
Sun Sep 28 20:20:47 PDT 2003
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT)
F. Even freebsdlists at elitists.org wrote:
I would like to upgrade a 4.0 machine to STABLE, or at least to the
RELENG
Jesse Sheidlower [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Originally I tried with dump, but I kept getting loads of
errors, so I switched to tar. I made one tarfile of /usr
(which is relatively large), and one of everything else.
There might have been a hint in the errors you were getting with
dump.
Note
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT)
F. Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to upgrade a 4.0 machine to STABLE, or at least to the
RELENG security level. How difficult will this be? Is there anything
special that I need to be concerned about, so I don't get bit? This
is kind
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Is RELENG_4_9 already available at all?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
does not mention it. That's why i am tracking RELENG_4.
Not yet. RELENG_4_9/4.9-RELEASE is
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:30:39AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
While we're at it: Will it be possible to upgrade from 4.9 to 5.x via CSV?
It's possible right now, but be warned that upgrading over a major
version bump is a significantly harder proposition than upgrading
within, say, 4.x. For
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:26:54AM -0700, Scott Schappell wrote:
It seems that 4.9 is rapidly on its way to becoming RELEASE, which is a good
thing. I'm currently running 4.8-p3 on my production server, and I don't
have a spare to build then move over, so it will be an in
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
Is RELENG_4_9 already available at all?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
does not mention it. That's why i am tracking RELENG_4.
Not yet. RELENG_4_9/4.9-RELEASE is expected in the near
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:26:54AM -0700, Scott Schappell wrote:
It seems that 4.9 is rapidly on its way to becoming RELEASE, which is a good
thing. I'm currently running 4.8-p3 on my production server, and I don't
have a spare to build then move over, so it will be an in place upgrade.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:26:54AM -0700, Scott Schappell wrote:
It seems that 4.9 is rapidly on its way to becoming RELEASE, which is a good
thing. I'm currently running 4.8-p3 on my production server, and I don't
have a spare to build then move over, so it will be an in place upgrade.
Do
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 01:12:33PM +0100, lemon wrote:
hi,
with respect to upgrading openssh on various boxes, i note that the
advisory[0] details killing and restarting sshd in order to bring the
new one into play.
the base sshd is dynamically linked against libssh, the version of
Hi,
II am trying to upgrade OpenSSH whihc is default in freeBSD .
I am trying it using /usr/ports/security/openssh
all the installation went good way .
I rebooted my system to the frsh installation of SSH to come into action ,But when i
gave
#ssh -V
it showed me the same old version
As of today, the CVS includes the patch for OpenSSH that fixes the
vulnerability. Yes, it still says version 3.6.1, but if you read on,
it has a patch date of 20030916.
Cool. How do you see what the patch date is? I know how to find
the version, but not things like the patch date.
[Dragoncrest wrote ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 9/17/03 10:47 AM]
Cool. How do you see what the patch date is? I know how to find
the version, but not things like the patch date. Man didn't tell me how to
either.
ssh -V, i think...
--
george donnelly ~ http://www.zettai.net/ ~ Quality Zope
Cool. How do you see what the patch date is? I know how to find
the version, but not things like the patch date. Man didn't tell me how to
either.
I am assuming that you mean the base system sshd. You can find the
details for the patch at CVSweb site:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Johan Paul wrote:
Hi all,
Refering to the latest sshd vurnability
(http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/1327248.shtml?tid=126tid=172) I
was thinking of upgradeing my sshd as well. So I cvsup'ed my system
(FBSD 4.8) and there seems to be a updated file for sshd. But how
At 07:24 PM 9/16/03 +0300, you wrote:
Hi all,
Refering to the latest sshd vurnability
(http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/1327248.shtml?tid=126tid=172) I
was thinking of upgradeing my sshd as well. So I cvsup'ed my system (FBSD
4.8) and there seems to be a updated file for sshd. But how do
Johan Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Refering to the latest sshd vurnability
(http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/1327248.shtml?tid=126tid=172)
I was thinking of upgradeing my sshd as well. So I cvsup'ed my system
(FBSD 4.8) and there seems to be a updated file for sshd. But how do I
Silly question. Been trying to update my code today and all I can
seem to update to is 3.6.1, yet I've seen other distros with 3.7.1p1
already. I think the openssh website also has 3.7.1p1 on it
too. Obviously the ports tree has gotta catch up, but does anyone know
when it will?
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade X by installing it from Ports,
and thought I had succeeded, as pkg_info and so forth are
reporting that XFree86-4.3.0,1 is installed. However, I'm
still running 4.2, as executing XFree86 -version
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
I suppose this is a really stupid question, but what do I
need to do to get the newer, Ports version of XFree86 to be
the version run on the system? And is there anything I should
be doing to get it configured properly after
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:44:45PM +0100, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:00:34AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
I suppose this is a really stupid question, but what do I
need to do to get the newer, Ports version of XFree86 to be
the version run on the system? And is
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:34:51AM -0400, Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
monopoly/etc/X11 $ pkg_info -r XFree86-4.3.0,1
Information for XFree86-4.3.0,1:
Depends on:
Dependency: expat-1.95.5
Dependency: png-1.2.5_2
Dependency: pkgconfig-0.15.0
Dependency: imake-4.3.0_1
Dependency:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 05:49:47PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Hmmm... I don't see the XFree86-Server port there. You may have an X
Server installed, but because the system doesn't recognise it as part
of an installed port, it isn't attempting to upgrade it.
You can always force the port
At 11:56 AM 8.29.2003 -0700, Michelle wrote:
I would like to upgrade mysql from mysql-server-3.23.54 to
mysql-server-3.23.57 and understand that I will need to do a dump
before upgrading since the upgrade needs to overwrite the databases.
Since I have never done this before, I just want to
I ran mysqldump -A backup-file.sql and then upgraded the mysql port,
but now when I try to restore the backups using mysql database name
backup-file.sql, It states unknown database. I also have a
mysqlhotcopy backup of all my databases. Am I doing something wrong
when trying to recover
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:33:07PM -0700, Michelle wrote:
I ran mysqldump -A backup-file.sql and then upgraded the mysql port,
but now when I try to restore the backups using mysql database name
backup-file.sql, It states unknown database.
I've never had a mysql upgrade trash my
I believe I succesfully restored the databases by running simply mysql
backup-file.sql. However, I believe the permissions are not working
properly. Apache is unable to connect the sql server and I cannot
shutdown the sql server with the user name and password I normally use.
On Friday,
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:48, David Banning wrote:
I am wondering about upgrading from 4.0 to 4.8.
I did a cvsup and then I did make world I get
errors. It seems to me that you have to upgrade
in stages. It this so? If so, what stages should
I do it in?
From 4.0, I'd first update to 4.3, then
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:23:24PM -0400, Adam McLaurin wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:48, David Banning wrote:
I am wondering about upgrading from 4.0 to 4.8.
I did a cvsup and then I did make world I get
errors. It seems to me that you have to upgrade
in stages. It this so? If so, what
Fabio Miranda Hamburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I have a 4,x machine and I want to upgrade it to 4-Stable branch.
I have internet access just by a HTTP proxy (squid).
I cant figure out how to configure CVSup to connect throught proxy.
Makes sense. cvsup doesn't use HTTP, so an HTTP
Gerard Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im getting this error (a bit long) -
[snip]
init_main.o(.text+0x2b9): undefined reference to `kse0_sched'
init_main.o(.text+0x2c3): undefined reference to `ksegrp0_sched'
This is a FAQ; it's covered in /usr/src/UPDATING in an entry from
January 25.
You
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:37:03PM +0200 or thereabouts, Maarten de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to upgrade my desktop pc, which ran 5.0-R without any
problems for months, to 5.1-R. After a make clean, I cvsup the latest
sources and then go 'make buildworld' and 'make installworld'.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:57:56PM -0700, root wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:37:03PM +0200 or thereabouts, Maarten de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to upgrade my desktop pc, which ran 5.0-R without any
problems for months, to 5.1-R. After a make clean, I cvsup the latest
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:32:16PM -0700, Joshua Oreman typed:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:16:50PM -0700 or thereabouts, cp seemed to write:
You should *really* use 'make buildkernel' in the toplevel if you're
combining it with a world update. Recommended procedure:
~# cvsup
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out what options I have for upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1.
Can I just use csvup to change my local copy of the source code, and
recompile? Ie do the same steps that I've done to upgrade after security
announcements? Would that just entail
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:51:50AM -0500 or thereabouts, Thomas T. Veldhouse seemed to
write:
You will need a whole new world as well.
cvsup
(cd /usr/src make world)
(cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf config GENERIC cd ../compile/GENERIC
make all install)
reboot
Approximately. I guess
Message-
#From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua Oreman
#Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:34 PM
#To: Thomas T. Veldhouse
#Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#Subject: Re: Upgrading 5.0 - 5.1
#
#
#On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:51:50AM -0500 or thereabouts, Thomas T.
#Veldhouse seemed
PROTECTED]
#Subject: Re: Upgrading 5.0 - 5.1
#
#
#On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:51:50AM -0500 or thereabouts, Thomas T.
#Veldhouse seemed to write:
# You will need a whole new world as well.
#
# cvsup
# (cd /usr/src make world)
# (cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf config GENERIC cd ../compile/GENERIC
# make all
You should *really* use 'make buildkernel' in the toplevel if you're
combining it with a world update. Recommended procedure:
~# cvsup /my/5.1.supfile
~# cd /usr/src
/usr/src# make buildworld
/usr/src# make buildkernel KERNCONF=yourKERNELname
/usr/src# make installkernel
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:16:50PM -0700 or thereabouts, cp seemed to write:
You should *really* use 'make buildkernel' in the toplevel if you're
combining it with a world update. Recommended procedure:
~# cvsup /my/5.1.supfile
~# cd /usr/src
/usr/src# make buildworld
/usr/src# make
cp wrote:
You should *really* use 'make buildkernel' in the toplevel if you're
combining it with a world update. Recommended procedure:
~# cvsup /my/5.1.supfile
~# cd /usr/src
/usr/src# make buildworld
/usr/src# make buildkernel KERNCONF=yourKERNELname
/usr/src# make installkernel
Konrad Heuer wrote:
[ ... ]
As far as I see there is little chance to do this without carefully
restarting all processes, e.g. by shutting down into single user mode and
returning to multi user mode.
It is advisable to switch into single-user mode when updating the system files,
agreed.
If you
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Konrad Heuer wrote:
[ ... ]
As far as I see there is little chance to do this without carefully
restarting all processes, e.g. by shutting down into single user mode and
returning to multi user mode.
It is advisable to switch into single-user mode
Jamie wrote:
I am trying to upgrade a running production server with rdist, but some
of the files will not update. I am getting messages like:
rdist: server.foo.net:/bin/rcp: Operation not permitted
updating: /kernel
rdist: server.foo.net:/kernel: Operation not permitted
updating: /sbin/init
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jamie wrote:
I am trying to upgrade a running production server with rdist, but some
of the files will not update. I am getting messages like:
rdist: server.foo.net:/bin/rcp: Operation not permitted
updating: /kernel
rdist: server.foo.net:/kernel: Operation not
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 06:55, Zach Thompson wrote:
Also, when and how should I change the mount points for
the file systems, e.g. via an install cd, before I switch mobos, etc.?
Sorry, really meant the device as this is what will be changing.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
it and the o/s saw
the stripe, but everything was corrupted on disk checks and such, so don't
let it fool you!
brent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zach Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
As per this announcement I updated my source tree to 'date=2003.03.08.10.10.00'
picking a date later than the Mar 4th date of FreeBSD-SA-03:04.
My question is that I get:
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979,
Got it and thank you to all who replied. It is my memory that with some builds I
have gotten something other than #0. But maybe that was from building something
other than RELENG_4. I the sendmail fix was important enough where I felt the
need for some reassurance.
Thanks again.
On Mon, 10 Mar
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Got it and thank you to all who replied. It is my memory that with some builds I
have gotten something other than #0. But maybe that was from building something
other than RELENG_4. I the sendmail fix was important enough where I felt the
need for
I cleaned /usr/obj/usr/... but not /usr/src which was at some version of 4.7.
Also my root partition is a bit small so I played some games with /modules
/modules.old and kernel.old. The count is driven off one of those?
I did not mess with anything in /usr/src including /sys/../compile/.
On Mon,
[Context lost to top posting]
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I cleaned /usr/obj/usr/... but not /usr/src which was at some version of 4.7.
Also my root partition is a bit small so I played some games with /modules
/modules.old and kernel.old. The count is driven off one of
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 at 00:47:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per this announcement I updated my source tree to
'date=2003.03.08.10.10.00' picking a date later than the Mar 4th date
of FreeBSD-SA-03:04.
From the announcement:
1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:05:45AM +0700, Roger Merritt wrote:
What's the currently recommended way to upgrade from XFree86 3.x to 4.x? I
remember last year seeing recommendations to ininstall XFree86 3.x,
uninstall all apps using X that you might have, delete /usr/X11R6/bin, and
then
701 - 800 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
