E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:22:05 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
This what happens when running portmanager:
ecerejo# portmanager -s
MGrStrlen error: NULL marker not found in string
Assertion failed: (0), function MGrStrlen, file MGrStrlen.c, line 54.
Abort (core dumped)
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date prior to running that
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree is up to
date
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you have for using an outdated ports tree?
Will
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you have for using an
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:47:10 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
My system was updated yesterday and I'm trying to resolve the issues
that arose from the updating. I can't update my system everyday I
just don't have time for it.
Obviously, it was not fully or correctly
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What conceivable reason would you have
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:37:54 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s only lists what needs to be done, it doesn't change
anything. It shows which packages are up to date, which are out of
date, which are current but have been built with out of date
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well. Make sure the ports tree
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct the problem as well.
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
What
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:45 +
Chris Whitehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
portmanager -s piped to a file might tell you what's missing
Just running:
portmanager -u -l -p -y
should correct
- Original Message -From: Chris Hill Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008
6:51 pmSubject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolutionTo: E.
J. Cerejo Cc: Dominic Fandrey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org On Sun, 10 Feb
2008, E. J. Cerejo wrote: Dominic Fandrey wrote: E. J. Cerejo
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ sorry, I couldn't entirely recover the format; need a newline once in
a while! ]
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill
Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:51 pm
Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution
To: E. J
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Gerard wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500
E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade?
Yes, I use it all the time.
Why has the ports tree be up to date?
Quoting E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution error, I can see
that the new version of icu installed
On Feb 9, 2008 12:17 PM, E. J. Cerejo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution error, I can see
that the new version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution error, I can see
that the new
On Saturday 09 February 2008 12:29:16 Matthew Seaman wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution error, I can see
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution error, I can
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 12:29:16 Matthew Seaman wrote:
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by evolution
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
On Saturday 09 February 2008 13:02:58 Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
E. J. Cerejo wrote:
Running FBSD 6.3 and after updating the ports where icu was one of the
ports to be updated I'm getting the
28 matches
Mail list logo
