Re: portupgrade question
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote: On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200 Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: THat's the point ! isnt that -R implied by -N ? From the portupgrade man page [...] -N --new Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are upgraded. No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up to date. I don't understand what you're are saying here. My reading of the manpage is the same as Dan's: when you install kdeadmin with portupgrade -N, everything that kdeadmin requires will be upgraded i.e. brought up to date. My mistake. It may be a regression with portupgrade; or just that the feature in the second sentence has never been implemented due to the overlap with -R Ah, I will send anemail to the maintainer, then. Let's investigate a bit more ! ;-) Many Thanks for your answers! d ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
Hi, The missing switch is the -R parameter of portupdate. I.e. portupgrade -vnyNbR Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD dan mesli...@yahoo.fr Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 08.07.2009 14:05 Please respond to mesli...@yahoo.fr To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject portupgrade question Hello, yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10 Noting that n is negated by y (my mistake), the result of this command was + print/cups-base + print/xdvik + print/cm-super + print/teTeX + sysutils/kdeadmin3 but I expected portupgrade to also upgrade some packages on which kdeadmin depends on (required packages ?). Am I wrong somewhere ? Is the order on which the arguments are given relevant ? To get the result I needed, I then issued the following command portupgrade -bRv -l file2 kdeadmin-3.5.10 and the result, as expected, was + converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.13) + audio/libogg (libogg-1.1.3,4) + audio/celt (celt-0.5.2) + audio/libvorbis (libvorbis-1.2.0_3,3) + audio/flac (flac-1.2.1) + devel/glib20 (glib-2.20.3) + audio/libsndfile (libsndfile-1.0.20) + audio/arts (arts-1.5.10_1,1) Thanks, d ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
THat's the point ! isnt that -R implied by -N ? From the portupgrade man page [...] -N --new Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are upgraded. If this option is specified, you can specify a portorigin glob as well as a pkgname glob to specify which port to install. See portsdb(1) for the details of the 'portorigin glob'. [...] :-) d On Wednesday 08 July 2009 13:33:49 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote: Hi, The missing switch is the -R parameter of portupdate. I.e. portupgrade -vnyNbR Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD dan mesli...@yahoo.fr Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org 08.07.2009 14:05 Please respond to mesli...@yahoo.fr To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc Subject portupgrade question Hello, yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10 Noting that n is negated by y (my mistake), the result of this command was + print/cups-base + print/xdvik + print/cm-super + print/teTeX + sysutils/kdeadmin3 but I expected portupgrade to also upgrade some packages on which kdeadmin depends on (required packages ?). Am I wrong somewhere ? Is the order on which the arguments are given relevant ? To get the result I needed, I then issued the following command portupgrade -bRv -l file2 kdeadmin-3.5.10 and the result, as expected, was + converters/libiconv (libiconv-1.13) + audio/libogg (libogg-1.1.3,4) + audio/celt (celt-0.5.2) + audio/libvorbis (libvorbis-1.2.0_3,3) + audio/flac (flac-1.2.1) + devel/glib20 (glib-2.20.3) + audio/libsndfile (libsndfile-1.0.20) + audio/arts (arts-1.5.10_1,1) Thanks, d ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: THat's the point ! isnt that -R implied by -N ? From the portupgrade man page [...] -N --new Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are upgraded. No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up to date. -- Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz -- A little learning is a dangerous thing but a lot of ignorance is just as bad. - Bob Edwards ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200 Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: THat's the point ! isnt that -R implied by -N ? From the portupgrade man page [...] -N --new Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are upgraded. No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up to date. I don't understand what you're are saying here. My reading of the manpage is the same as Dan's: when you install kdeadmin with portupgrade -N, everything that kdeadmin requires will be upgraded i.e. brought up to date. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote: On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200 Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote: THat's the point ! isnt that -R implied by -N ? From the portupgrade man page [...] -N --new Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed. Prior to the installation a new port/package, all the required packages are upgraded. No. Since the dependant package *is* installed. It's just not up to date. I don't understand what you're are saying here. My reading of the manpage is the same as Dan's: when you install kdeadmin with portupgrade -N, everything that kdeadmin requires will be upgraded i.e. brought up to date. My mistake. It may be a regression with portupgrade; or just that the feature in the second sentence has never been implemented due to the overlap with -R -- Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz -- Irrationality is the square root of all evil - Douglas Hofstadter ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config questions? You could add: BATCH=yes to /etc/make.conf. Or use the --batch command line option to portupgrade. Or use the -c option (as mentioned by someone else in this thread) to do all of the config questions up front. I didn't know about that one. -j -- Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config questions? You could add: BATCH=yes to /etc/make.conf. Or use the --batch command line option to portupgrade. Or use the -c option (as mentioned by someone else in this thread) to do all of the config questions up front. I didn't know about that one. -j Or use portconfig -a My usual updating routine involves: - update the ports tree using csup - update the INDEX-x with the command make index in the directory /usr/ports - download all the tarballs upfront with the command portfetch -a -v - do all the configuration upfront with the command portconfig -a - do an unattended compile/install of the ports with the command portmaster -a -u -d -v The ports portconfig portfetch are part of sysutils/bsdadminscripts. Portmaster can be found at ports-mgmt/portmaster. It is possible to write a simple shell script that automatically does all of the above. The only time attention is required is to enter data during the configuration process. Cheers... Marek ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults. Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config questions? I'd like to leave my laptop alone over-night doing a portupgrade of gnome... etc without baby-sitting it. If something does happen to get built without a setting I want, I can always redo it later, but for 95% of all the builds, I take the defaults and would rather not be prompted on those. You could add: BATCH=yes to /etc/make.conf. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote: Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults. Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config questions? I'd like to leave my laptop alone over-night doing a portupgrade of gnome... etc without baby-sitting it. If something does happen to get built without a setting I want, I can always redo it later, but for 95% of all the builds, I take the defaults and would rather not be prompted on those. 'portupgrade -c' causes it to show all the config screens first. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question (failed updates)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: What do we do about packages that fail to update? This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about the ones where there is a configure error or uknown build error or install error FYI -- I followed the following steps: 1) upgraded from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE 2) updated /usr/ports: #portsnap fetch/extract/update 3) udated db: #pkgdb -u 4) fixed db: #pkgdb -F 5) updated installed packages: #portupgrade -av At the end of the week-long process I have 6 failed attempts: linux-atk-1.9.1 (install error) linux-pango-1.10.2 (install error) intltool-0.37.1 (unknown build error) xkeyboard-config-1.3 (configure error) shared-mime-info-0.51 (configure error) policykit-0.9_1 (configure error) My system seems to run just fine. So, should I be worried? Thanks! If your system runs fine then you've got a bit of time on your hands to investigate further into why those ports didn't build. First, check /usr/ports/UPDATING for any errata against those ports. Then upgrade them one by one. E.g: # portupgrade -v linux-atk etc. and take note of whereabouts in the build process it is failing. The use of scrl-lock and page-up/down is recommended in looking at the output or use script(1). You should be able to figure out what is going wrong from the output. If you can't, post the output of portupgrade (snipped around where it goes wrong) to this list and people will help you. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all: I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box. What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again? Next time, use sysutils/screen. You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
Thanks Glen: Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again? --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: portupgrade question To: ipfr...@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 6:16 PM On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all: I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box. What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again? Next time, use sysutils/screen. You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Glen: Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again? Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. Otherwise, yes, it is too late. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
Thanks Glen: So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs? --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com Subject: Re: portupgrade question To: ipfr...@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 6:16 PM On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all: I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box. What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again? Next time, use sysutils/screen. You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Glen: So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs? Please stop top-posting. Continue with the command you had already used. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
Glen Barber writes: Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again? Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. Not according to my understanding of portupgrade. It's going to try to rebuild every port (-a) whether it needs it or not (-f). Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Glen Barber writes: Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again? Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off. Not according to my understanding of portupgrade. It's going to try to rebuild every port (-a) whether it needs it or not (-f). Then he should remove the -f flag. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST) gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all: I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box. What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again? If you know roughly when you started the run you can do something like this: portupgrade -f -y '2009-02-22 12:00' ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade question
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
From: Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
= mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.
= Attempting to fetch from
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.5/source/.
mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz 0% of 36 MB 108 kBps^C
fetch: transfer interrupted
How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
TIA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set the following in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/openoffice.org-2' = 'WITHOUT_MOZILLA=1',
}
frase
When I did this, I had to put in:
'editors/openoffice.org*' = '-DWITH_SYSTEM_FREETYPE -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA',
to get it to build the way I wanted it to. Without the '-D', it
simply didn't do anything.
It's easy to tell if it is working because the 'make config' will not
list the options that are defined. (This may be openoffice.org
specific.) If you see it list WITHOUT_MOZILLA in the options, it means
it will build with mozilla.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
pgpbTZ5IQWuTs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote: I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with: make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla: To build OOo, you should have a lot of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB). If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver = mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2. = Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.5/source/. mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz 0% of 36 MB 108 kBps^C fetch: transfer interrupted How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this? The way I prefer to do it is to install ports-mgmt/portconf, and then have an entry in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf of: editors/openoffice.org-*: WITHOUT_MOZILLA portconf will ensure that the WITHOUT_MOZILLA flag is passed to make(1) when you do a manual port install, or through portupgrade, or through portmaster. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Don't worry about avoiding temptation, as you grow older, it starts avoiding you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
= mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2.
= Attempting to fetch from
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.5/source/.
mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz 0% of 36 MB 108 kBps^C
fetch: transfer interrupted
How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
TIA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Set the following in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/openoffice.org-2' = 'WITHOUT_MOZILLA=1',
}
frase
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with: make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla: To build OOo, you should have a lot of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB). If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver = mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice.org2. = Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.7.5/source/. mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz 0% of 36 MB 108 kBps^C fetch: transfer interrupted How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this? The portupgrade(1) is your best friend. ;-) # man portupgrade Cheers, Mezz TIA -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
* AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-13-2008]: How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this? Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf. -- Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade will honour it (without -P/-PP options, of
course).
As far as I know, portupgrade won't honour this setting vim is
upgraded as a dependency of some other port. (Please correct me if
I'm wrong. I haven't tried this; its just something I read).
At least with portupgrade-devel, that doesn't seem true. I read it
too, and the source was an unofficial blog. For example, I have:
MAKE_ARGS = {
[...]
'print/apsfilter' = 'PAPERSIZE=a4',
'print/ghostscript-gpl' = 'A4=yes',
[...]
}
ghostscript-gpl is a dependency of apsfilter. Now, ghostscript-gpl
needed update. I removed apsfilter for this testing purpose and:
# portupgrade -NR apsfilter
[...]
--- Installing 'apsfilter-7.2.8_3' from a port (print/apsfilter)
--- Building '/usr/ports/print/apsfilter' with make flags: PAPERSIZE=a4
[...]
--- Upgrading 'ghostscript-gpl-8.57' to 'ghostscript-gpl-8.57_1'
(print/ghostscript-gpl)
--- Building '/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gpl' with make flags: A4=yes
A4=yes
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear in the
Handbook.
I just like to keep all ports/packages upgrading options at the same
place (USE_PKGS, MAKE_ARGS, USE_PKGS_ONLY...).
BTW, as far as I can recollect, as a global-honouring tool for ports
configuration, the most frequently quoted one along these lists was
ports-mgmt/portconf.
Nikola Lečić
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
Nikola Lecic wrote: So the /etc/make.conf option is better. It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear in the Handbook. I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to _everything_ that uses the standard make infrastructure. That includes today's port, where WITH_MUMBLEFROTZ is essential. It also includes the equally critical port you're trying to install in nine months, long after you forgot you put WITH_MUMBLEFROTZ in make.conf, and whose resultant misbehavior will be difficult to diagnose. (Misspell something, and you might even affect compiling the OS. No thanks.) I use portupgrade and pkgtools.conf. Perhaps not the fastest, but generally reliable and has few unintended consequences. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade will honour it (without -P/-PP options, of
course).
As far as I know, portupgrade won't honour this setting vim is
upgraded as a dependency of some other port. (Please correct me if
I'm wrong. I haven't tried this; its just something I read).
At least with portupgrade-devel, that doesn't seem true. I read it
too, and the source was an unofficial blog. For example, I have:
MAKE_ARGS = {
[...]
'print/apsfilter' = 'PAPERSIZE=a4',
'print/ghostscript-gpl' = 'A4=yes',
[...]
}
ghostscript-gpl is a dependency of apsfilter. Now, ghostscript-gpl
needed update. I removed apsfilter for this testing purpose and:
# portupgrade -NR apsfilter
[...]
--- Installing 'apsfilter-7.2.8_3' from a port (print/apsfilter)
--- Building '/usr/ports/print/apsfilter' with make flags: PAPERSIZE=a4
[...]
--- Upgrading 'ghostscript-gpl-8.57' to 'ghostscript-gpl-8.57_1'
(print/ghostscript-gpl)
--- Building '/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gpl' with make flags: A4=yes
A4=yes
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear in the
Handbook.
I just like to keep all ports/packages upgrading options at the same
place (USE_PKGS, MAKE_ARGS, USE_PKGS_ONLY...).
BTW, as far as I can recollect, as a global-honouring tool for ports
configuration, the most frequently quoted one along these lists was
ports-mgmt/portconf.
Nikola Lečić
Thanks Nikola, Roland, Rakhesh,
I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt dependencies.
I would prefer to use pkgtools.conf for several reasons:
1) It keeps all the ports related configuration together
2) MAKE_ARGS get echoed when things are being built, whereas arguments
in make.conf don't seem to
3) If I run 'make install clean', I'd rather it built things as default,
rather than just being an alternative to 'portupgrade -N'
Regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikola Lecic wrote: So the /etc/make.conf option is better. It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear in the Handbook. I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to _everything_ that uses the standard make infrastructure. Not if you define them conditionally as Roland suggested - portsconf is equivalent to this. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100 Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt dependencies. Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that case. According to /usr/ports/UPDATING recommendations (20070519): # portupgrade -f -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade # ... (etc., do the rest in order to rebuild /var/db/ bits and to build or fetch the new INDEX.) If dependencies bug ever really existed (I can't remember that anyone confirmed that offering an example), it was related to non-devel version. I would prefer to use pkgtools.conf for several reasons: [...] 2) MAKE_ARGS get echoed when things are being built, whereas arguments in make.conf don't seem to Agree here, this is sometimes the only 100% sure method to know how the binary in question was really built. Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally been
installed without X11:
# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim
# NO_GUI=1 make install clean
Now, this option appears to have been lost as I've ended up with a
full X11 installation. Is this the expected behaviour, or did I do
something wrong?
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade will honour it (without -P/-PP options, of
course).
Nikola Lečić
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally been
installed without X11:
# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim
# NO_GUI=1 make install clean
Now, this option appears to have been lost as I've ended up with a
full X11 installation. Is this the expected behaviour, or did I do
something wrong?
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
Alternatively, you can put the defines in /etc/make.conf. That way it
will be used whatever build/upgrade tool you use;
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/editors/vim*}
NO_GUI=yes
.endif
Note the * after vim, so it will work for all versions.
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
pgp8aPVQEhoTK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade question
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade will honour it (without -P/-PP options, of
course).
As far as I know, portupgrade won't honour this setting vim is upgraded as
a dependency of some other port. (Please correct me if I'm wrong. I
haven't tried this; its just something I read). So the /etc/make.conf
option is better.
Thanks,
Rakhesh
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700 Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''. -Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a Make sense. I've been using these instructions for awhile now: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html After all this time, go figure. Cheers, Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700 Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''. -Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote: ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a central repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used across most/all of them). in situations where new packages are built from ports (ie, when the package in /usr/ports/packages/All is no longer the most current), the -p is going back and repackaging lots of packages that already exist. is there a way to tell portupgrade not to repackage things that are not new versions? thanks, Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''. Force upgrade of all ports, their dependants and dependencies (recursively), build a package of the the newly compiled port, and do it verbosely. Or just use ``-arRPv'' if you do not want to rebuild or reinstall current ports (while still building packages). -Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: Hi people, I just did the portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* to upgrade the apps, but i think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is the cause to all the rest. To fix this, should I apply the same command or can i use portupgrade -fr glib-2\* ? thanks!! I experienced the same problem. I simply ran: portmanager -u -l -y and everything got built correctly. -- Gerard Friends come and go but enemies accumulate. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On 7/20/06, Nagy László [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After running portupgrade -aP I get this: ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error) * x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4) * x11/linux-XFree86-libs (linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7) --- Packages processed: 0 done, 136 ignored, 2 skipped and 1 failed ** Could not clean up temporary directory: Directory not empty - /var/tmp/portupgradeibUXCdq2 It ignored 136 packages. Is this safe? How can I know what it ignored and why? Packages are usually ignored if they need no update ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question (solved)
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works just fine on the same machine. Thanks a lot. On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote: wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having problems fetching files from FTP sites. No idea what the problem is. Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This is set in the default login class, but perhaps you have modified it. Kris On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :) Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question (solved)
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote: I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works just fine on the same machine. Different defaults. Thanks a lot. np. Kris pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade question (solved)
I solved thid problem after export to the environment the variable FETCH_CMD=fetch -p. -- Rafael Mentz Aquino BSDServer Ltda. 51 - 9847 8825 -- Original Message --- From: Michael S [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400 Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved) I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works just fine on the same machine. Thanks a lot. On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote: wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having problems fetching files from FTP sites. No idea what the problem is. Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This is set in the default login class, but perhaps you have modified it. Kris On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :) Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- End of Original Message --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought
that portupgrade ignored its configuration file, however once or twice
I misstyped something and it did catch it.
Any hints?
echo 'FETCH_CMD=/etc/fetch_wget' /etc/make.conf
,[ fetch_wget ]
| #!/bin/sh
| eval url=\${$#}
| echo invoked as fetch_cmd $*
| wget -c some you proxy options $url
`
--
Regards,
Andrey.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought
that portupgrade ignored its configuration file, however once or twice
I misstyped something and it did catch it.
Any hints?
echo 'FETCH_CMD=/etc/fetch_wget' /etc/make.conf
,[ fetch_wget ]
| #!/bin/sh
| eval url=\${$#}
| echo invoked as fetch_cmd $*
| wget -c some you proxy options $url
`
--
Regards,
Andrey.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :) Kris pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade question
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote: I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought that portupgrade ignored its configuration file, however once or twice I misstyped something and it did catch it. did your set HTTP_PROXY and FTP_PROXY in your shell environment? see fetch(3). hth, toni -- If you understand what you're doing, you're | toni at stderror dot at not learning anything. | Toni Schmidbauer -- Anonymous| ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget doesn't have a problem with that. More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine. On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote: I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought that portupgrade ignored its configuration file, however once or twice I misstyped something and it did catch it. did your set HTTP_PROXY and FTP_PROXY in your shell environment? see fetch(3). hth, toni -- If you understand what you're doing, you're | toni at stderror dot at not learning anything. | Toni Schmidbauer -- Anonymous| ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having problems fetching files from FTP sites. No idea what the problem is. On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :) Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought that portupgrade ignored its configuration file, however once or twice I misstyped something and it did catch it. Any hints? P.S. I am running 5.5 if it makes any difference, although I think it shouldn't. Hi Michael, I don't think that portupgrade actually downloads source code from the internet. Rather, portupgrade is a bit of a wrapper around the normal FreeBSD ports code. According to the handbook, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html The ports system uses fetch(1) in order to download any files. I thought that there was a way to convince the ports to use a different file retreiver, but I don't see anything in the handbook. Have you tried setting the ftp_proxy and http_proxy environment variables, so that fetch can work with your proxy? HTH, -Andy Reitz. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade question
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote: wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having problems fetching files from FTP sites. No idea what the problem is. Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This is set in the default login class, but perhaps you have modified it. Kris On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote: Good day everyone! I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch doesn't appear to cope with it very well. What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :) Kris pgpzcb5qHUwRC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade question
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote: I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following error and exchange came up: server# pkgdb -F --- Checking the package registry database Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 - openssl-0.9.7d (security/openssl): New dependency? (? to help): ? [Enter] to skip, [Ctrl]+[D] to delete, [.][Enter] to abort, [Tab] to complete New dependency? (? to help): portupgrade-20040325_1 Fixed. (- portupgrade-20040325_1) Cyclic dependencies: portupgrade-20040325_1 - (portupgrade-20040325_1) Unlink portupgrade-20040325_1 - portupgrade-20040325_1 ? [yes] Command failed [exit code 1]: grep -v \^portupgrade-20040325_1\\\$\ /var/db/pkg/portupgrade-20040325_1/+REQUIRED_BY /tmp/+REQUIRED_BY82988.0 server# What should I have chosen? pkgdb -F doesn't find any problems now, and no errors that I *see* are coming up, but should I deinstall and reinstall portupgrade or have I done something wrong to the database? How can I fix it? It was complaining because you didn have openssl installed, so you need to install openssl-0.9.7d and link portupgrade to it. It is probably faster to just portupgrade portupgrade again but things can go wrong :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
