1) Given a system running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE, is anything bad gonna
happen if I insert a drive into this thing while the system is running?
Assuming your board supports sata hotswap (too lazy to check) it'll be
just fine. I've done this many times with the machine I'm messing with
zfs
On Sat, 18 May 2013 10:49:13 -0400
Quartz articulated:
You need the sata ports running in straight up pure ahci mode (as
opposed to IDE mode or compatible or something that emulates old
style parallel-ata). Be aware that Windows up through XP doesn't
support ahci, so if you're dual booting
In message 519794e9.6080...@sneakertech.com,
Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote:
3) Assuming that I want to do this stuff, what BIOS options should I
be setting or unsetting on the motherboard?
You need the sata ports running in straight up pure ahci mode (as
opposed to IDE mode
You need the sata ports running in straight up pure ahci mode (as
opposed to IDE mode or compatible or something that emulates old
style parallel-ata).
OK. Thanks Quartz,. I'll make it a point to check for that.
The wording on different bios' can often be confusing. I've seen ahci
mode
Be aware that Windows up through XP doesn't
support ahci,
There is a huge amount of information via a quick Google search that
would seem to contradict your statements regarding WinXP and AHCI.
Sorry, poor choice of wording. I meant earlier versions of Windows don't
support achi
(which may
be ASrock as well), but I don't believe I had to do anything other
hand make sure eSATA was enabled.
I don't there there is any difference between SATA and eSATA above the
physical layer. I'm not sure what that setting would do.
At a guess, it could connect one of the internal SATA
Warren Block writes:
I don't there there is any difference between SATA and eSATA above the
physical layer. I'm not sure what that setting would do.
At a guess, it could connect one of the internal SATA ports to
the eSATA connector.
That's the way mine works; on the other
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
I bought one of these things awhile ago:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004LXJXSW/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8psc=1
I believe I have a similar object, only a) external (eSATA), b)
from a different manufacturer, and c) connected to a -CURRENT
often
works for USB-connected devices which also use CAM, and maybe
SATA and eSATA also support it today?
2) Given a system running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE, is anything bad
gonna happen if I remove a drive from this thing while the system
is running, assuming that I have already properly
), but I don't believe I had to do anything other
hand make sure eSATA was enabled.
I don't there there is any difference between SATA and eSATA above the
physical layer. I'm not sure what that setting would do.
You do need to set the SATA channel to AHCI. Note that this may require
Windows
a similar object, only a) external (eSATA), b)
from a different manufacturer, and c) connected to a -CURRENT
system. I use it as a backup device.
Yea, mine is internal, and real SATA. I wonder if that will make a
difference.
1) Given a system running FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE, is anything bad
gonna
In message 20130514144721.aa321c25.free...@edvax.de,
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
I've been using SCSI hot swap devices for many years, and
they usually required a re-scan of the bus. The same often
works for USB-connected devices which also use CAM, and maybe
SATA and eSATA also support
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
That works for me. I need to re-scan the ata channel using
atacontrol but once that happens it's fine.
Hummm... I tried atacontrol info and I got this:
atacontrol:
ATA_CAM option is enabled in kernel.
Please use camcontrol instead.
So I
-connected devices which also use CAM, and maybe
SATA and eSATA also support it today?
OK, so what command should I use when I plug a drive in? Would that be
camcontrol rescan foo where foo is something like /dev/ada0?
No. You use the typical SCSI-like device notation, bus:unit:lun,
for example 0:1
I bought one of these things awhile ago:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004LXJXSW/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00?ie=UTF8psc=1
So far, it seems to be working just peachy, but I have yet to do anything
the least bit adventurous with it, such as trying to either insert a drive
into it or remove a
On 2013-04-15 07:49, Beeblebrox wrote:
EDIT: I had already placed in /etc/devfs.conf this entry some time ago:
# Allow members of group operator to mount cdrom
own /dev/cd0 root:operator
perm/dev/cd0 0660
Not allowing mount despite all of these adjustments (being
.
Set the CDDA_DEVICE environment variable or use the -D option.
Regards.
-
10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user-tp5803691p5804740.html
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT), Beeblebrox wrote:
The user also needs access to the corresponding pass device which is shown
by camcontrol devlist. He also needs access to /dev/xpt0 I think.
Correct, that matches my settings. :-)
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4165B DL05 at scbus6 target
in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user-tp5803691p5804757.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:41:11AM -0700, Beeblebrox typed:
But the group permissions are --- (none).
D'oh!
Well, that made a difference and I can query the cd0 device with cdda2wav as
my user now.
I still can't mount a data CD however.
What's the output of:
sysctl vfs.usermount
??
--
What's the output of: sysctl vfs.usermount
vfs.usermount: 1
I can mount USB devices...
-
10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 03:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Beeblebrox wrote:
But the group permissions are --- (none).
D'oh!
Well, that made a difference and I can query the cd0 device with cdda2wav as
my user now.
I still can't mount a data CD however.
You need write access to the cd, pass and xpt
group operator
/etc/rc.conf has:
devfs_system_ruleset=localrules
Regards.
-
10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user-tp5803691.html
Sent from
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:11:38 -0700 (PDT), Beeblebrox wrote:
My user is unable to mount cdrom and cannot use qemu for the HDD devices. Why
is access to these devices being refused for my user?
Because there have to be certain permissions in order to allow
a non-root user perform such tasks:
1.
...
Regards.
-
10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user-tp5803691p5803879.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive
is what I am unable to figure out.
-
10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sata-ata-device-permission-for-user-tp5803691p5803900.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there a way to detach and attach a device on a sata channel in
FreeBSD 9
on FreeBSD 8 I used atacontrol detach to detach a sata HD bevor
removing it from a hotswap bay and atacontroll attach to rescan the
channel after inserting a new
Hello,
are there any plans to provide a driver for the supermicro sat2-mv8
(8-port) sata raid card ?
Kind regards,
Dirk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
My configuration is as follows:
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE
Supermicro X8DTi-LN4F (Intel Tylersburg 5520 chipset) motherboard
24 GB system memory
32 x Hitachi Deskstar 5K3000 disks connected to 4 x Intel SASUC8I (LSI 3081E-R)
in IT mode
2 x Crucial M4 64 Gb SATA SSD for FreeBSD OS (zroot)
2 x Intel 320
Looking through the list of SATA Controllers available at Best Buy, I don't
find any of them listed on the 9.0 hardware page. I need a couple cheap ones
(for non-production systems). Does anyone have recommendations?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 07/10/2012 12:00 PM, Bosko Radivojevic wrote:
Hi,
i just forgot to add following output from FreeBSD 8.3:
# atacontrol status ar0
ar0: ATA RAID1 status: READY
subdisks:
0 ad4 ONLINE
1 ad6 ONLINE
Thanks,
Bosko
Hi Bosko,
For FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE see the release notes
# gmirror list
gmirror: Command 'list' not available.
# gmirror status
gmirror: Command 'status' not available.
gmirror load
It is probably soft-RAID, but I prefer to use it though appropriate
driver instead of classical software RAID configured through OS.
i would recommend otherwise.
On 07/10/2012 12:11 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
It is always better to use gmirror instead of hardware RAID. One have
full control over what is going on
mmh not always. Nothing replaces a good hardware RAID card with a BBU
for real reason i used parantheses for word hardware.
That's clear
Hi Bas,
thank you for response. 'geom disk list' gives me list of disks, but
'geom raid load;geom raid list' doesn't give anything. I've tried
'geom load mirror', but 'geom mirror list' is also empty.
What next? :)
Thanks!
___
That's clear to me.
These hardware raid controllers are not very reliable because they are
indeed not real hardware raid controllers, but software based.
Maybe for desktop usage it's ok/ good enough?
precise what is desktop usage is.
i don't see a reason for doing mirroring for home use.
It
'geom raid load;geom raid list' doesn't give anything. I've tried
'geom load mirror', but 'geom mirror list' is also empty.
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 07/10/2012 12:20 PM, Bosko Radivojevic wrote:
Hi Bas,
thank you for response. 'geom disk list' gives me list of disks, but
'geom raid load;geom raid list' doesn't give anything. I've tried
'geom load mirror', but 'geom mirror list' is also empty.
What next? :)
Thanks!
Hi Bosko,
I do not
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
But mirror (raid10) array is created through LSI MegaRAID BIOS. I'm
trying to replicate behaviour from FreeBSD 8.3 (array created through
RAID BIOS, seen
I proceeded with: graid label Intel raid RAID1 ada0 ada1. Hope this
works what I want :)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Bosko Radivojevic
bosko.radivoje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
what other do you expect with
On 07/10/2012 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
That's clear to me.
These hardware raid controllers are not very reliable because they are
indeed not real hardware raid controllers, but software based.
Maybe for desktop usage it's ok/ good enough?
precise what is desktop usage is.
Here at
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Bosko Radivojevic wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
But mirror (raid10) array is created through LSI MegaRAID BIOS. I'm
if it is RAID10 i assume you
Hi Bosko,
I do not have any experience with these kind of controllers, so I could just
guess.
I have a lot ;) but the only thing i always do is to disable RAID in
BIOS just after receiving new machine. whole experience.
___
Hi all!
I have a problem installing FreeBSD 9.0 on Fujitsu Primergy RX200 S5
server with LSI MegaRAID SATA controller (two SATA HDDs in RAID1
array). When booted from a CD, FreeBSD doesn't recognize RAID Array,
it recognizes HDDs only (ad4 ad6). On the same server, FreeBSD 8.3
installation
On 3/31/2012 6:28 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
We would like to build a FreeBSD machine ourselves with many (~15) SATA
drives, but NOT use a RAID controller. We want to be able to remove any
drive and connect it to an ordinary motherboard SATA port and mount the
filesystem using only the OS
We would like to build a FreeBSD machine ourselves with many (~15) SATA
drives, but NOT use a RAID controller. We want to be able to remove any
drive and connect it to an ordinary motherboard SATA port and mount the
filesystem using only the OS provided drivers and tools. I have built many
from my previous message:
Does growisofs work on CDRs or only DVDs?
If 'cdrecord -scanbus' doesn't work at all, how do I get the SCSI device
n:n:n? Use camcontrol?
I see both FreeBSD and NetBSD have makefs (which can make a UFS/FFS or iso
file system, taking the place of mkisofs in
I built and installed sysutils/cdrtools when there was a
thread on burncd and SATA, but cdrecord can't see anything
(running cdrecord -scanbus):
cdrecord: Inappropriate ioctl for device. CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl failed. Cannot
open or use SCSI driver.
cdrecord: For possible targets try
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:23:13 + (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
After I failed to burn a CD in NetBSD (5.1_STABLE) on the
older computer (i386) with cdrecord, I booted into FreeBSD
8.2 RELEASE and was successful with burncd. That drive was
CD-RW, ATAPI, that computer has ATA but no SATA.
Good
What software, base or ports, is used to burn a CD or DVD on a SATA drive,
/dev/cd0 ?
Would burncd be appropriate, or do I need cdrtools? Or cdrkit?
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 amd64.
I built and installed sysutils/cdrtools when there was a thread on burncd and
SATA, but cdrecord can't see
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:32:16 + (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
What software, base or ports, is used to burn a CD or DVD on
a SATA drive, /dev/cd0 ?
Would burncd be appropriate, or do I need cdrtools? Or cdrkit?
This is on FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 amd64.
I can imagine that in 9.0 where acd
Has anyone tried using an SATA SSD card (SATA add-on card that is a SSD
drive) in FreeBSD? I was looking at an OCZ RevoDrive and was wondering
if anyone had tried using one of those specifically, or any SATA SSD
card in general.
Rob
___
freebsd
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Rob li...@midsummerdream.org wrote:
Has anyone tried using an SATA SSD card (SATA add-on card that is a SSD
drive) in FreeBSD? I was looking at an OCZ RevoDrive and was wondering if
anyone had tried using one of those specifically, or any SATA SSD card
--As of May 21, 2011 7:26:22 PM -0700, Jason C. Wells is alleged to have
said:
I am looking to get 2 sata host adapters. The mandatory requirements are
good freebsd support and hot swap capability. I plan to use gmirror. I
have discovered that my onboard chipsets don't support hot swap
I am looking to get 2 sata host adapters. The mandatory requirements
are good freebsd support and hot swap capability. I plan to use
gmirror. I have discovered that my onboard chipsets don't support hot swap.
The highpoint cards are rated highly on newegg. Are these good with
freebsd
servers with them now, but FreeBSD recognizes the disks
attached to them fine (so long as your on = 8.2 and you add
hw.hptrr.attach_generic=0 in /boot/loader.conf). I haven't tried
hot-swapping any drives yet, but I'm assuming since it's SATA it should
work fine. I should probably verify that soon
My hardware: Dell 1950 with dual quad-core X5450 processors, 16GB RAM,
boot drive connected to a SAS 6/iR controller (mpt0), pair of external
ACARD 9010 RAMDisks (da3 da4) connected to an LSI SAS3801E controller
(mpt1). The RAMdisks are configured in a ZFS mirror (Backbone) in hopes of
both high
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:37:11 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
DN If you do a verbose boot, you should get a couple more lines printed:
DN
DN ahci0: Caps: 64bit NCQ SNTF AL CLO 3Gbps PM PMD SSC PSC 32cmd CCC EM 6ports
DN ahci0: Caps2:
DN ahci0: EM Caps: ALHD XMT SMB LED
DN
DN If you see NCQ in your Caps
(62089A2)'
class = mass storage
subclass = SATA
bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x18a0, size 8, enabled
bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1874, size 4, enabled
bar [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1878, size 8, enabled
bar [1c
= SATA
bar [10] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x18a0, size 8, enabled
bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1874, size 4, enabled
bar [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1878, size 8, enabled
bar [1c] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1870, size 4, enabled
bar
Bahman Kahinpour bahman.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is AHCI mode the best mode for SATA controller?
(highest speed, utilizing all fancy features, ...)
In general, probably yes, provided the combination of hardware
and driver actually works properly _all_ the time :)
AHCI is new enough
Hello FreeBSD people all over the world,
There is an onboard Intel SATA controller on Intel DH55HC motherboard.
I have tried FreeBSD version 7.3 and 8.1 on this motherboard, it
recognizes the SATA controller but recognizes the hard disk as IDE
devices. How can this happen?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD
Do you mean that both traditional IDE drives and these new SATA drives
both begin with ad in FreeBSD? I am new to FreeBSD, I have just
migrated from Linux. In Linux, traditional IDE drives used to begin
with hd and these new SATA drives began with sd and recognized as
SCSI devices. I expected
On 01/25/11 00:01, Bahman Kahinpour wrote:
Do you mean that both traditional IDE drives and these new SATA drives
both begin with ad in FreeBSD? I am new to FreeBSD, I have just
migrated from Linux. In Linux, traditional IDE drives used to begin
with hd and these new SATA drives began with sd
-Original Message-
From: Bahman Kahinpour [mailto:bahman.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 January 2011 11:40
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Onboard SATA Controller of Intel DH55HC Motherboard (FreeBSD 7.3
FreeBSD 8.1)
Hello FreeBSD people all over the world,
There is an onboard
Oh man, I really liked your answer, thanks so much. I disabled all
legacy options in the BIOS (SATA controller is in AHCI mode which I do
not know what it is) and added this little ahci_load=YES thing to
/boot/loader.conf and now my hard drives are recognized as: (and
changed fstab and of course
On 10 January 2011 21:46, Carl Chave c...@chave.us wrote:
snip
echo -en \n\nNow run these two commands to make the changes live, and
reboot
zfs set mountpoint=legacy $zpool/be/$nroot
zpool set bootfs=$zpool/be/$nroot $zpool\n\n
Thanks for the input krad. It would be nice to easily
On 11 January 2011 09:09, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2011 21:46, Carl Chave c...@chave.us wrote:
snip
echo -en \n\nNow run these two commands to make the changes live, and
reboot
zfs set mountpoint=legacy $zpool/be/$nroot
zpool set bootfs=$zpool/be/$nroot $zpool\n\n
On 11 January 2011 09:19, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2011 09:09, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2011 21:46, Carl Chave c...@chave.us wrote:
snip
echo -en \n\nNow run these two commands to make the changes live, and
reboot
zfs set mountpoint=legacy
below install the base system with zfs
root on a usb stick and /tmp /usr /var and swap on mirrored sata
drives.
I've tested these steps and everything works but before I press on
with actually configuring and using the server, does anybody have any
input on whether I should or shouldn't do
snip
echo -en \n\nNow run these two commands to make the changes live, and
reboot
zfs set mountpoint=legacy $zpool/be/$nroot
zpool set bootfs=$zpool/be/$nroot $zpool\n\n
Thanks for the input krad. It would be nice to easily switch back and
forth but aren't you still stuck if everything
and swap on mirrored sata
drives.
I've tested these steps and everything works but before I press on
with actually configuring and using the server, does anybody have any
input on whether I should or shouldn't do it this way? ZFS best
practices suggests that having elements of the root filesystem
On 10/11/10 21:22, Alejandro Imass wrote:
1) Would damage to the 2 disks cause damae on the other 2?
Not likely but in your situation it might damage the controller, in
which nothing you do to the drives will help. In the worst case, the
controller then might in turn damage the drives.
. In the worst case, the controller
then might in turn damage the drives.
I was under the impression that SATA was not that sensible to hot
unplugging, in fact I thought that SATA supports hot pluging, so by
yanking the wires out it should not have damaged the disks or the
controller IMO. But you might
the controller, in which
nothing you do to the drives will help. In the worst case, the controller
then might in turn damage the drives.
I was under the impression that SATA was not that sensible to hot
unplugging, in fact I thought that SATA supports hot pluging, so by
yanking the wires out it should
Hello,
I have a 4drive zfs pool with raidz on FBSD 8 and I accidentally
tripped and yanked the sata wires off 2 drives while it was running. I
immediately shutdown the server, fixed the wiring and re-started the
server. Incredibly I ran zpool status and zpool scrub and only 8 files
were damaged
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:22:41 -0400, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
2) Is there a utility in FBSD to check the physical drive itself and
mark any bad sectors as such?
There is smartctl in port smartmontools,
and badsect provided by the system.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:22:41 -0400, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
2) Is there a utility in FBSD to check the physical drive itself and
mark any bad sectors as such?
There is smartctl in port smartmontools,
and badsect
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:13 PM, freebsd-questions
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it
to.
For more information on our business please click on the following link:
Click here for our website
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.comwrote:
Andy Wodfer wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0 release (will upgrade to 8.1 STABLE tonight).
However, I'm having big problems adding a new harddrive to the system. I
want a separate 1TB SATA installed to recover
Hi all,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0 release (will upgrade to 8.1 STABLE tonight).
However, I'm having big problems adding a new harddrive to the system. I
want a separate 1TB SATA installed to recover backup files on, but when I
add it I only get error messages:
dmesg:
ad2: 953869MB WDC WD1000FYPS
Andy Wodfer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.0 release (will upgrade to 8.1 STABLE tonight).
However, I'm having big problems adding a new harddrive to the system. I
want a separate 1TB SATA installed to recover backup files on, but when I
add it I only get error messages:
dmesg
Il 07/16/10 00:24, Dan Nelson ha scritto:
In the last episode (Jul 15), Michael Anderson said:
Or, more clearly: Are SATA tape drives supported? I see they are on some
other BSD flavors, but I haven't found any mention in the FreeBSD hardware
compatibility documents.
I see an atapist device
Or, more clearly: Are SATA tape drives supported? I see they are on
some other BSD flavors, but I haven't found any mention in the FreeBSD
hardware compatibility documents.
Will the OS just see a tape drive on a SATA controller as a
sequential-access SCSI device the way it sees SATA disks
In the last episode (Jul 15), Michael Anderson said:
Or, more clearly: Are SATA tape drives supported? I see they are on some
other BSD flavors, but I haven't found any mention in the FreeBSD hardware
compatibility documents.
I see an atapist device in /sys/conf/NOTES:
device atapist
Hello,
I'm looking to replace a busted tape ATA DAT drive with a Quantum DLT SATA
drive. Is this supported?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Hello,
I'm looking to replace a busted tape drive with a Quantum DLT SATA
drive. Is this supported?
Thanks!
--
Michael Anderson
IT Services Support
elego Software Solutions GmbH
Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25
Building 12.3 (BIG) room 227
13355 Berlin, Germany
phone +49 30 23 45 86 96
know the current state of functionality for the above Marvell
chipsets?
Rob
On 06/30/2010 09:07 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 06/29/10 16:58, Rob wrote:
I've been trying to find a PCI-e SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for
a FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD
SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for
a FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD
8.0 will support them. Ideally I'd like to find one that is not a HW
Raid controller, as I don't need that functionality since I place to
use ZFS and the HW Raid on the card just gets
On 06/29/10 16:58, Rob wrote:
I've been trying to find a PCI-e SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for
a FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD
8.0 will support them. Ideally I'd like to find one that is not a HW
Raid controller, as I don't need that functionality
, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 06/29/10 16:58, Rob wrote:
I've been trying to find a PCI-e SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for
a FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD
8.0 will support them. Ideally I'd like to find one that is not a HW
Raid controller, as I don't need
of functionality for the above Marvell
chipsets?
Rob
On 06/30/2010 09:07 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 06/29/10 16:58, Rob wrote:
I've been trying to find a PCI-e SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for
a FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD
8.0 will support them
I've been trying to find a PCI-e SATA II (300MB/s) controller card for a
FreeBSD 8.0 system, but am having problems determining if FreeBSD 8.0
will support them. Ideally I'd like to find one that is not a HW Raid
controller, as I don't need that functionality since I place to use ZFS
Hello,
I am trying to install a toshiba HD on an appliance, the Toshiba is a MK2565GSX
of 250GB described
here:http://www3.toshiba.co.jp/storage/english/spec/hdd25/65.htm#spec02
The system I am trying to install is pfSense (FBSD 7.2).
I am not a 100% sure about the disk geometry… as It is
Looks like the problem was related to BIOS setting.
I have changed the setting of disk detection from AUTO to LBA and this has
allowed me to boot on the disk.
One more question:
With the disk I am using FBSD seems to have two possibility for the partition
table size (or at least depending
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Bell [mailto:je...@nrdx.com]
Sent: 18 June 2010 06:11
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Need help with SATA disk timing out in 8.1 Beta
I am having all sorts of problems with drives in a new server.
I have a 450G sata drive that hold my root
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jerry Bell je...@nrdx.com wrote:
I am having all sorts of problems with drives in a new server.
I have a 450G sata drive that hold my root partition, works great, no
issues.
I have a second, 1TB drive that has been all sorts of trouble. When
writing
Have you changed the cable?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Yes, twice.
On 6/18/2010 4:52 AM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
Have you changed the cable?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I am having all sorts of problems with drives in a new server.
I have a 450G sata drive that hold my root partition, works great, no
issues.
I have a second, 1TB drive that has been all sorts of trouble. When
writing to this disk, I occasionally see errors like this:
Jun 17 07:40:36 www3
I'd appreciate it if someone could lend some assistance with this issue. The
machine in question is pretty much unusable atm!
Regards,
Casey
- Casey Scott ca...@phantombsd.org wrote:
Since upgrading to 8.0 RELEASE, I continually get these errors:
...
Jun 11 15:24:08 kernel: ad6:
1 - 100 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
