On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:46:24 -0400 Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 11:49 AM, David Allen wrote:
On 4/2/10, Jon Radelj...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
[much stuff deleted --SB]
Interesting reading. Thanks for elaborating.
So the IDENT protocol
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk writes:
Ident queries like this will cause a delay if the other side
doesn't respond respond to the ident query ...
I consider it polite for firewalls to actively refuse to open
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 01:51:27, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to sendmail
from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail
On 4/1/10, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/04/2010 01:51:27, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to sendmail
from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail delays five seconds
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
If he had local DNS configured, there would
On April 2, 2010, Jon Radel wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
On 4/2/10, Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT query.
On 4/2/10 11:49 AM, David Allen wrote:
On 4/2/10, Jon Radelj...@radel.com wrote:
On 4/2/10 8:33 AM, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 15:12:33, Jon Radel wrote:
This is why there's a school of thought that even if your default for
firewall configuration is to quietly drop unwanted packets, IDENT is a
protocol that you should actively reject. It makes things move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2010 13:33:09, David Allen wrote:
Secondly, it seems the cause of the OP's problem was a delay associated
with an IDENT query. Specificially
confTO_IDENT Timeout.ident [5s] The timeout waiting for a
response to an IDENT
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk writes:
Ident queries like this will cause a delay if the other side doesn't
respond respond to the ident query. That's typical behaviour for most
machines that run firewalls nowadays. Given that ident is broken as
designed (see rant in other
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to sendmail from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail delays five seconds before sending
the greeting. I would like it to respond immediately.
A quick
A delay of that long can be cause by the system attempting to do name
resolution on your IP. Try entering the IP of the testing system into
/etc/hosts and see if the delay goes away. If it does, then you know.
Bruce
On 04/01/2010 05:51 PM, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on
On April 1, 2010, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
A delay of that long can be cause by the system attempting to do name
resolution on your IP. Try entering the IP of the testing system into
/etc/hosts and see if the delay goes away. If it does, then you know.
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately it
At 08:51 PM 4/1/2010, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to
sendmail from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail delays five seconds before sending
the greeting. I would
On April 1, 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:51 PM 4/1/2010, Norbert Papke wrote:
When I connect to sendmail on a local interface, sendmail responds to the
connection with its 220 greeting immediately. If I connect to
sendmail from
another machine on my (home) LAN, sendmail delays five seconds
16 matches
Mail list logo
