Hi ;
A general question pls excuse me
can any body suggest a backup mechanism for a server machine , which has a
web portal , email server ,PgSQL database 4GB size , DNS server, Mailman ,
and a mediawiki applications running in a single machine .
Can you suggest good solutions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
dhaneshk k sat at his 'pewter and typed on 09/21/07 13:55:
Hi ;
A general question pls excuse me
can any body suggest a backup mechanism for a server machine , which has
a web portal , email server ,PgSQL database 4GB size , DNS
dhaneshk k wrote:
Hi ;
A general question pls excuse me
can any body suggest a backup mechanism for a server machine , which
has a web portal , email server ,PgSQL database 4GB size , DNS server,
Mailman , and a mediawiki applications running in a single machine .
Can you suggest good
a clarification
The backup should be the uptodate one , so in case of a disk crash
(permanent crash) I need the backup upto the last moment , so is ther
any cheap tools , to do it , so i can save the backups to another
desktop pc synchronously (I mean any mechanism for backup through
online ie
A general question pls excuse me
can any body suggest a backup mechanism for a server machine , which has a
web portal , email server ,PgSQL database 4GB size , DNS server, Mailman ,
and a mediawiki applications running in a single machine .
Can you suggest good solutions , for the server
Hello DharneshK,
You can try to create a Mirror using RAID. You can either create a
software or a hardware (recommended) managed Mirror. In case of a disk
both are software. while the software one you talking about is gmirror -
very portable and easy to use contrary to BIOS-based hardware
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:14:25 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can try to create a Mirror using RAID. You can either create a
software or a hardware (recommended) managed Mirror. In case of a disk
both are software. while the software one you talking about is
, and use cp -lpR to make multiple
generations on backup server every day. i delete the oldest when there are
out of space.
but gmirror+ggated/c is a good idea for those having more than 1 server
and gigabit interfaces - do mirrorring spanning different machines (like
mirror of first on second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wojciech Puchar a écrit :
of course, that's why i use rsync, and use cp -lpR to make multiple
generations on backup server every day. i delete the oldest when
there are out of space.
but gmirror+ggated/c is a good idea for those having more than
Hi ;
A general question pls excuse me
can any body suggest a backup mechanism for a server machine , which has a
web portal , email server ,PgSQL database 4GB size , DNS server, Mailman ,
and a mediawiki applications running in a single machine .
Sounds like a fairly small server
you made before
upgrading, as outlined in /usr/src/UPDATING. Downgrades are especially hard.
But which configuration files are
the ones I need to backup the most? I know rc.conf and loader.conf,
but what else would be needed to easily restore the setup of the
system? Would I just somehow
I'm about to downgrade from -CURRENT to 6-STABLE, and since I can't
seem do it in place without screwing around with a lot of stuff, I
might need to reinstall completely. But which configuration files are
the ones I need to backup the most? I know rc.conf and loader.conf,
but what else would
Joshua Isom writes:
I'm about to downgrade from -CURRENT to 6-STABLE, and since I
can't seem do it in place without screwing around with a lot of
stuff, I might need to reinstall completely. But which
configuration files are the ones I need to backup the most?
My gut reaction
Hi,
Please kindly advise us can the FreeBSD 6.1 being backup via Veritas
Backup Exec 11d Server for Windows with the Linux Client agent ? Thank for
the help.
Thanks Regards
Kenny Lee
Pre-Sales Support Department
Technology Management Consulting Division
Hi,
Please kindly advise us can the FreeBSD 6.1 being backup via Veritas
Backup Exec 11d Server for Windows with the Linux Client agent ? Thank for
the help.
~~
Hi,
On our side, we didn't manage to make this happen using the regular linux
agent that veritas (now Symantec
Hi there,
If I created an encrypted partition using geli, is it possible back it
up to another machine and still keep in encrypted? I want to use geli
for my subversion repository and then back it up to an offsite host
(hopefully using something like rsync).
Thanks!
Neil Gruending
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:02:53 -0700
Neil Gruending [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
If I created an encrypted partition using geli, is it possible back it
up to another machine and still keep in encrypted? I want to use geli
for my subversion repository and then back it up to an offsite
Thanks for filling in the blanks, Roland!
--- Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 06:42:20PM -0700, L Goodwin
wrote:
I have a Samba share on a software RAID 1 array
(using
gmirror) that I need to backup. I want to create a
shell script that does a level 0
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 06:42:20PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote:
I have a Samba share on a software RAID 1 array (using
gmirror) that I need to backup. I want to create a
shell script that does a level 0 backup every time to
(alternately) one of two USB drives. I plan to have
only ONE USB drive
I have a Samba share on a software RAID 1 array (using
gmirror) that I need to backup. I want to create a
shell script that does a level 0 backup every time to
(alternately) one of two USB drives. I plan to have
only ONE USB drive connected at a time.
I want the script to mount the drive
On 24-May-07, at 12:33 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 23, 2007, at 19:03, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Excellent point.
Perhaps I'm asking
2 x system space would be enough for a full dump plus plenty of
increments, I'd say. No? Is there a rule of thumb? 3x? 4x?
That depends how much your file system change. If every ficle change
befor the incremental run, dump 1 will be equal to dump 2, and 2x will
be enough for just dump0
to dump 2, and 2x will
be enough for just dump0 and dump 1.
There is no rule.
How would one go about gauging their system for the number of file
system changes to determine a suitable amount of backup space?
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions
On 24-May-07, at 3:43 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
Rsync will leave you with a duplicate of the drive. You could
pretty much boot off it and run. You would need to configure the
drive and install a boot loader though.
The boot off and run is more in-line with what I want to do, so I
will go
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
So I feel a need to start backing up my servers. To that end, I've
decided that it's easier for me to grab an external USB drive instead
of a tape. It would seem dump/restore are the tools of choice. My
backup strategy
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:03:40PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Excellent point.
Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question, so let me try
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:10:43AM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 24-May-07, at 12:33 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
On May 23, 2007, at 19:03, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology
. If every ficle change
befor the incremental run, dump 1 will be equal to dump 2, and 2x will
be enough for just dump0 and dump 1.
There is no rule.
How would one go about gauging their system for the number of file
system changes to determine a suitable amount of backup space?
To some
are the tools of choice. My backup strategy is
pretty much I don't want to be screwed if my RAID goes away. That said I
have a few questions along those lines:
- Most articles I've read suggest a full backup, followed by incremental
backups. Is there any real reason to adopt that format
So I feel a need to start backing up my servers. To that end, I've
decided that it's easier for me to grab an external USB drive instead
of a tape. It would seem dump/restore are the tools of choice. My
backup strategy is pretty much I don't want to be screwed if my RAID
goes away
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
- Other folks dumping to a hard drive at night? Care to share any of
your experiences/rationale?
Not with dump/restore. After using amanda and a tape drive for eons I'm
now happy with a bacula solution to backup 2 freebsds and a windows
machine. It does incrementals
On 24/05/07, Howard Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
- Other folks dumping to a hard drive at night? Care to share any of
your experiences/rationale?
Not with dump/restore. After using amanda and a tape drive for eons I'm
now happy with a bacula solution to backup 2
On May 23, 2007, at 16:27, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
So I feel a need to start backing up my servers. To that end, I've
decided that it's easier for me to grab an external USB drive
instead of a tape. It would seem dump/restore are the tools of
choice. My backup strategy is pretty much I
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Excellent point.
Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question, so let me try it this way
instead:
I'm looking for a backup solution that I can
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 21:03:40 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Excellent point.
Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question, so let me try it this way
you are backuping. Dump is OS
specific. Ifwhat really, really matters is the data, notthe OS, not
the software, tar may be more generic and could even be recovered on a
Windows machine.
My
backup strategy is pretty much I don't want to be screwed if my RAID
goes away. That said I have
On May 23, 2007, at 19:03, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On 23-May-07, at 9:23 PM, Doug Hardie wrote:
The criteria for selecting a backup approach is not the backup
methodology but the restore methodology.
Excellent point.
Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question, so let me try it this way
Also, dump/restore allows you to use snapshots on a live filesystem (I would
test it properly on a large FS with heavy activity).
But it's worth pointing out that this is fully possibly with any backup
tool - just run mksnap_ffs and backup a mounted snapshot. I do this with
rdiff-backup
--On Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:30:00 +0200 Peter Schuller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, dump/restore allows you to use snapshots on a live filesystem (I
would test it properly on a large FS with heavy activity).
But it's worth pointing out that this is fully possibly with any backup
tool
I'm presently backing up two servers in a remote location to a usb drive
located elsewhere by using rsync over ssh (all three are FreeBSD boxes.)
After the recent discussion about dump, I'm wondering if I would gain
anything by using dump rather than rsync. Has anyone used both? Any
thoughts
and had to replace the disk (or undo
an inappropriate rm -rf *).
Either would be about the same effort restoring a single or handful
of files from backup.
jerry
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http
thoughts as to which is better and why?
The rsync command I use is:
rsync -avz ${LOCALDIR} -e ssh -i ${KEY} ${REMOTEHOST}:${REMOTEDIR}
Personally I never find dump/restore practical since I seldom want to
backup entire filesystems for performance/diskspace reasons.
I have not found any truly perfect
changes are lost. If you rsync to a different
directory every time to keep different versions, you might as well use
tar, because rsync won't save a lot of space/time in that case. And dump
will backup all ufs2 features such as flags and acls. I'm not sure if
rsync can manage that. It's also easy
. If you rsync a
directory, all previous changes are lost. If you rsync to a different
directory every time to keep different versions, you might as well use
tar, because rsync won't save a lot of space/time in that case. And dump
will backup all ufs2 features such as flags and acls. I'm not sure if
rsync
of space/time in that case. And dump
will backup all ufs2 features such as flags and acls. I'm not sure if
rsync can manage that. It's also easy to compress dumps, which can save
a lot of space.
Tar is expensive time-wise anyhow after a while if you use compression.
Also, rsync does diffs on files
it is easier to keep different ones around. If you rsync a
directory, all previous changes are lost. If you rsync to a different
directory every time to keep different versions, you might as well use
tar, because rsync won't save a lot of space/time in that case. And dump
will backup all ufs2 features
by using dump rather than rsync. Has anyone used both? Any
thoughts as to which is better and why?
The rsync command I use is:
rsync -avz ${LOCALDIR} -e ssh -i ${KEY} ${REMOTEHOST}:${REMOTEDIR}
Personally I never find dump/restore practical since I seldom want to
backup entire
(in particular, -h )
having said that, each tool has its advantages i use rdiff-backup for my
laptop, but dump/restore on servers .
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it 'code'.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents
--- Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
L Goodwin writes:
The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb
drives are not
considered a good long-term storage solution, but
for daily
backups, I could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB
drives (until data
grows too large).
And if
. This has so far cost less than $200, with an
incremental cost of $50 per week of backup.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote:
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file
server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1
Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows
Vista Home Premium users
It's true, but amanda allows for a holding disk that the backups get
sent to, so the dumps themselves don't take so long. So, the other
machines that are being backed up, and do the real work in house, don't
take any longer then when I had a tape drive on the backup host. From
the holding disk
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM -0700, L Goodwin wrote:
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file server
I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex
that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium users
Thanks, Olivier. The lack of a Recycle Bin for Samba shares had not occured to
me. I guess I should have each Windows client backup of all files modified that
day to a space on the local drive...
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to implement an automated
backup facility
experience, ideas and suggestions!
Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:01:17PM
-0700, L Goodwin wrote:
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file
server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1
Mirror/Duplex that is made
a couple of 2GB+ USB drives (until data grows too large).
I would get one with a real harddisk instead of a thumbdrive. More
capacity and probably a longer life.
Using USB drives, there might be a way to completely automate
backups. Using devd(8) it should be possible to detect that one of your
backup
L Goodwin writes:
The USB drive option is interesting. I know thumb drives are not
considered a good long-term storage solution, but for daily
backups, I could rotate a couple of 2GB+ USB drives (until data
grows too large).
And if you've been retiring undersize IDE drives to a
On 23/04/07, Wood, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2007 8:21 AM
To: L Goodwin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backup media choices
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file server I'm
setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1 Mirror/Duplex that is
made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium users as a
Samba share. I also plan to create system recovery disks
On 4/24/07, L Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file
server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1
Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista
Home Premium users as a Samba share. I
At 07:01 PM 4/23/2007, L Goodwin wrote:
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file
server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1
Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista
Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Marsh
Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2007 8:21 AM
To: L Goodwin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backup media choices for FreeBSD servers
On 4/24/07, L Goodwin [EMAIL
I need to implement an automated backup facility on the FreeBSD file
server I'm setting up for a client. It will have a software RAID 1
Mirror/Duplex that is made available to Windows XP SP2 and Windows
Vista Home Premium users as a Samba share. I also plan to create
system recovery disks
L Goodwin writes:
1) Cost is a primary concern. Budget does not allow for a
multi-drive solution. Best if client does not handle backups
(change discs/tapes), so a solution that permits storing several
backups to same disc/tape preferred.
2) I only want to back up user data (not the
My decade old Loader Express with ten 40 GB tapes finally died a couple
of months ago. So, I just switched over to a different style. I don't
know how applicable it is to your situation. I have used amanda for
years to manage tape drives. In the latest version they support backup
to hard disk
Since tapes get expensive and disks are relatively cheap I went out and
bought a 300 GB USB disk drive for about $90.00. Right now I have amanda
configured to back things up onto 6 virtual tapes each of about 40GB,
USB is a nice and cheap solution, as long as you don't have too much
data to
After a recent disk failure, I left myself a note to add the DNS/DHCP
info to my backup.
I have a small, over-engineered for my education, network of 10
computers in my house. I run BIND with dynamic zones on my FreeBSD
server, I also use the DNS service on my Win2k-AD server. They both
After a recent disk failure, I left myself a note to add the
DNS/DHCP info to my backup.
I have a small, over-engineered for my education, network of
10 computers in my house. I run BIND with dynamic zones on
my FreeBSD server, I also use the DNS service on my Win2k-AD
server
I am looking to automate the process of backing up my Cisco routers and
switches config files and have come across RANCID. Is this what I
should use on my FreeBSD server or is there something better?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hello:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:19 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List
Subject: Best Open Source software to backup Cisco switches and
routers
I am looking
anything about RANCID, but I recently used expect and a
shell-script wrapper to do the backups on 3 Cisco routers. I just
setup a TFTP server on our backup machine and punched the correct
holes in the firewall. There's a command you can run on the router
itself to send the config off to a remote
Robert Huff wrote:
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file
server. I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share
it with a couple of servers). I'd also like to be able to move
backups to an off-site storage, so external HDD won't probably
work for me. My
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:06:44PM -0700, Vlad Skvortsov wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file
server. I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share
it with a couple of servers). I'd also like to be able to move
backups
use geli(8). This encrypts the raw disk
with AES. I'm using it with my USB backup disk.
Yes, I'm aware of that. I guess my question was: why did you refer to
this particular enclosure? Or you just happen to have this one and this
is the reason?
--
Vlad Skvortsov, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://vss
Robert Huff wrote:
Check out Addonics, particularly the Saturn system.
I have one of these:
http://www.addonics.com/products/Saturn/aeschd.asp
I recommend against buying anything from a company which
(a) uses DES,
(b) describes it as bullet proof protection, or
(c) doesn't
John Levine wrote:
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file server.
I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share it with a couple
of servers). I'd also like to be able to move backups to an off-site
storage, so external HDD won't probably work for me. My
Vlad Skvortsov writes:
http://www.addonics.com/products/Saturn/aeschd.asp
Yes, I'm aware of that. I guess my question was: why did you refer to
this particular enclosure? Or you just happen to have this one and this
is the reason?
I happen to have this one; it's possible,
Garrett Cooper writes:
Have you also considered tape backup as well as standard disks?
Tapes are a bit more expensive, but overall a more static backup
/ archiving solution than disks. Besides, they're cheaper in the
long run from what remember.
The problem is: tapes are slow
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:12:11AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Garrett Cooper writes:
Have you also considered tape backup as well as standard disks?
Tapes are a bit more expensive, but overall a more static backup
/ archiving solution than disks. Besides, they're cheaper
Get a couple of 150G USB disks. They work great, you can use
dump/restore or just pax -r -w to copy stuff to the disks.
Have you also considered tape backup as well as standard disks?
I used to use DLT tapes, and I looked at AIT before I decided on
disks. The disks have a couple
[please CC: me, I'm not on the list]
Hi!
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file server.
I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share it with a couple
of servers). I'd also like to be able to move backups to an off-site
storage, so external HDD won't
Vlad Skvortsov writes:
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file
server. I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share
it with a couple of servers). I'd also like to be able to move
backups to an off-site storage, so external HDD won't probably
work
I'm looking for an external backup solution for my FreeBSD file server.
I want it to be pluggable via USB interface (I'd share it with a couple
of servers). I'd also like to be able to move backups to an off-site
storage, so external HDD won't probably work for me. My data size is
currently
I currently backup important files to DVD weekly. These files are 2G
in size total, so I waste ~2.7G on each DVD (these are DVD-Rs, so I
can't wipe/re-use them).
How can I use this wasted space to do a complete backup? Example:
first week, backup the first 2.7G of my HD; second week, backup
Im trying to write a small backup script which I have put in
/etc/periodic/weekly. The script is as follows..
#!/bin/sh
#
#weekly backup of chosen files
#
if
then
tar -cf /dev/sa0 /var/ftp /home /etc /usr/local
echo backing up the disks
else
echo
Robert Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Mar 03, 2007 (09:06 +) wrote:
Im trying to write a small backup script which I have put in
/etc/periodic/weekly. The script is as follows..
#!/bin/sh
#
#weekly backup of chosen files
#
if
then
tar -cf /dev/sa0 /var/ftp /home
HI All,
I need to automatically once a day backup some files on my Win 2003
serve to my remote FreeBSD box running v6.
What i need specifically is to compress the win files as small as they
can be then either set my FreeBSD box to go a get the file or tell win
to send it to my FreeBSD box
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:46:07 +
Dave Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI All,
I need to automatically once a day backup some files on my Win 2003
serve to my remote FreeBSD box running v6.
What i need specifically is to compress the win files as small as
they can be then either set
On 01/03/07, Nick Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:46:07 +
Dave Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI All,
I need to automatically once a day backup some files on my Win 2003
serve to my remote FreeBSD box running v6.
What i need specifically is to compress
the FreeBSD side to rotate the
backups. There is a very good starting point for this at
http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots/ .
Good luck!
Dave Carrera skrev:
HI All,
I need to automatically once a day backup some files on my Win 2003
serve to my remote FreeBSD box running v6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know. However FreeSBIE mounts its bootable CD as root directory
(/) and then creates few RAM drives for /etc /usr etc. But I need the
CD-ROM drive to read the CDs with backup files...
Frenzy (http://www.frenzy.org.ua/en/) can free CD drive
data + different hdd for photos)?
I want to be sure that the restored system is exactly the same as on backup,
that is to preferrably use -r option.
For that case, I would follow the same advice from Oliver Fromme,
except that instead of booting to a minimal installation on the hard
disk, booting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The restore method will then require to boot from a bootable CD. The
rescue CD system should load itself into RAM drive, so that I can dismount
it and replace it with the CD/DVDs with the backup files.
The rescue CD should provide basic commands
On Monday 19 February 2007 10:29, Oliver Fromme wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The restore method will then require to boot from a bootable CD. The
rescue CD system should load itself into RAM drive, so that I can
dismount it and replace it with the CD/DVDs with the backup
Hi,
Yesterday, I backed up my MySQL jail with tar jcpf (and used tar
jxpvf to extract).
Now, when I try to run it as I used to (jail -U mysql /jail/mysqld/
mysqld.domaine.com 192.168.1.6 /usr/local/libexec/mysqld ), it fails
giving me a Permission Denied error.
If I try to run it with chroot -u
Hi,
I've reinstalled MySQL in the jail to be sure, and it's still not working.
I also forgot to tell that the previous jail ran under a 6.1 upgraded to 6.2.
Now, I'm running a fresh 6.2-RELEASE.
The error message is the same :
jail: execv: /usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Permission denied
Thank
I tried to use truss inside the jail : I copied the truss binary and
ran ldd to copy the libraries needed by truss. I admit that I forgot
to mount a /proc filesystem in the jail (truss needs it).
But truss can't be executed (so /proc isn't a problem yet), the error
is the same :
jail: execv:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:26:28AM -0800, Dino Vliet wrote:
I'm busy preparing my via c3 system to utilize it as a
backup file server.
On the motherboard I have two IDE channels and
currenntly they have installed a IDE hard disk and a
dvd-rom. However, I have bought an extra IDE cable
Hi list!
I plan to use a full backup of my working desktop FreeBSD 6.2 STABLE
with:
dump -0LuB 10 -f backup.0,backup.1,backup.2 /
(before I will check the number of files needed with dump -S /)
Then gzip the backup.* files separately and burn them to CDs or DVDs.
The restore method
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list!
I plan to use a full backup of my working desktop FreeBSD 6.2 STABLE
with:
dump -0LuB 10 -f backup.0,backup.1,backup.2 /
snip
It would be possible to use some linux distro, but support for UFS2 is
required (I recall that MoviX has worked like
401 - 500 of 1134 matches
Mail list logo
