On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:23 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
[...big snip...]
if i've made any sense so far, great! if not,i'm open for
questions. i'm also open for suggestions on how to alter this
network configuration.
thanks for reading this
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 22:10 -0400, Carl Chave wrote:
Hi Gary,
Just a couple of thoughts, as your setup sounds similar to mine (and a
lot of others' I'm sure) - I too recently decided to make a concerted
effort to reduce power consumption. I just re-did my file server with
FreeNAS and even
(But if a dual or a quad sucks up too
many watts, that blows much of the original purpose of cutting my
footprint.
Newer cpu's(multicore vs single) are pretty efficient, here's an article
so you don't have to take my word for it.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 01:47:11AM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
(But if a dual or a quad sucks up too
many watts, that blows much of the original purpose of cutting my
footprint.
Newer cpu's(multicore vs single) are pretty efficient, here's an article
so you don't have to take my word
I'm enclosing most of what I wrote late last night; essentially a request
for how to restrucure my network so that it is easily to maintain and
uses much less energy. --I sent a few emails from a different platform
where I have mutt. Don't know why this did not get out; it was in my
Gary Kline wrote:
[...big snip...]
if i've made any sense so far, great! if not,i'm open for
questions. i'm also open for suggestions on how to alter this
network configuration.
thanks for reading this far.
gary
It might be simplest to replace my
Hi Gary,
Just a couple of thoughts, as your setup sounds similar to mine (and a
lot of others' I'm sure) - I too recently decided to make a concerted
effort to reduce power consumption. I just re-did my file server with
FreeNAS and even though I've got tons of hardware laying around I
decided to
