On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 ... nvidia-kmod are the minimal ones I need]) the
> main reason for asking is PAE seems to be broken now
The last I heard the nvidia driver wasn't c
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:13:36 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 12/16/12 07:08, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > And if you're using Firefox, there are plugins available that
> > allow you to download video content instead of dealing with the
> > "Flash" player the site wants you to use.
>
> and the recommen
On 12/16/12 04:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
> on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
> apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/coo
On 12/16/12 11:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook, dev
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:48:40 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Specific requirements _could_ be wine and nVidia's proprietary GPU
> driver, as far as I know." - Polytropon (Btw. thank you Polytropon :)
I'm using amd64 on an Atom/ION box here, the Nvidia binary drivers
work fine for both openGL
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
"If you do not h
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:05:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > flash
>
> For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
> there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
> should use the Linux vers
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version, than Flash in the near future either way
won't work any more. I
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
"If you do not have a _specific_ requirement for 32 bit, use
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
> switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
> on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
> apache22, flash, cups,
On 12/16/12 05:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook, dev
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook, devel/fhist,
virtualbox-ose, nvidia-kmod are t
Oliver Iberien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 31 December 2006 11:05, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:40:37AM -0800, Oliver Iberien wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What actually needs to be done when switching machine architectures? I am
> > > facing a motherboard/CPU upg
On Sunday 31 December 2006 11:05, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:40:37AM -0800, Oliver Iberien wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What actually needs to be done when switching machine architectures? I am
> > facing a motherboard/CPU upgrade following the demise of an Athlon+
> > setup. (I am
Thank you very much!
On Sunday 31 December 2006 11:05, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:40:37AM -0800, Oliver Iberien wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What actually needs to be done when switching machine architectures? I am
> > facing a motherboard/CPU upgrade following the demise of an At
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:40:37AM -0800, Oliver Iberien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What actually needs to be done when switching machine architectures? I am
> facing a motherboard/CPU upgrade following the demise of an Athlon+ setup. (I
> am running my FreeBSD drive in a P3 while trying to figure this ou
Hi,
What actually needs to be done when switching machine architectures? I am
facing a motherboard/CPU upgrade following the demise of an Athlon+ setup. (I
am running my FreeBSD drive in a P3 while trying to figure this out.)
Replacing it with an oldish P4 would be easiest but they are rapidly
17 matches
Mail list logo
