At 01:58 10/6/2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 01:29:19 -0500, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Try /rescue/ls explicitely instead.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands
At 08:47 10/6/2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
The emergency holographic shell was always very
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
At 08:47 10/6/2013, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
The emergency
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:45:58 -0500, W. D. wrote:
Thanks, Polytropon. I couldn't get FrieSBIE to work.
It's a rather old project, and as far as I know, it isn't
being continued anymore. It should still support at least
the CLI mode for most computers... (I have to admit that
I'm still using it,
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
Trying to clone a hard disk that has an number
of bad sectors. Trying to save most of my data.
Want to use recoverdisk
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 01:29:19 -0500, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Try /rescue/ls explicitely instead.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
Only live systems offer more than
On Sun, 6 Oct 2013, W. D. wrote:
Booted with both. Alt-F4 to get to command line.
Very limited commands: ls: not found.
Why? What good are these disks if they don't have
the most basic of commands?
The emergency holographic shell was always very limited. I suspect a
path thing
On 2013-08-19 16:12, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 19 August 2013 09:15, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get:
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB
size to 10
Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get:
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB size to
10 bytes
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get:
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB
size to 10 bytes
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status:
On 19 August 2013 09:15, Rares Aioanei bsdlis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400
Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get:
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB
size to 10 bytes
(cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEADTITLEUntitled Document/TITLE
META content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type
STYLE type=text/css
!--
style2 {font-size: 10px}
style3 {
font-family: Calibri;
font-size: 12px;
color:
echo Testing, testing, testing |/usr/bin/tee -a /var/log/httpd-access.log
|/usr/bin/logger -t base_http_access /var/log/testing.log
This writes to the httpd-access.log but does not write to
/var/log/testing.log. I'm probably reading the man page incorrectly, but I
thought this should work.
logger logs to syslog, so unless you have user.notice logging to
/var/log/testing.log this
will probably not do what you are expecting. Have a look in /var/log/messages
for
something like this.
Jun 27 16:38:03 xxx-hostname base_http_access: /var/log/testing.log
Otherwise, you may want to setup
Fetching 1 metadata files... 70.5%
done.
70.5%
70.5%
74.2%
74.2%
81.7%
81.7%
70.5%
I think this is a result of having -v in my GZIP environment variable.
I always forget about my GZIP and BZIP2 variables. I should've known.
So, never mind about that.
I'm using freebsd-update to upgrade my system to the latest minor release.
At a couple points in the process, I get weird status indicators (percentages)
showing me that something is happening:
Fetching 1 metadata files... 70.5%
done.
70.5%
70.5%
74.2%
74.2%
81.7%
81.7%
70.5%
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
set it up how you want.
a simple
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:08:15 -0500, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
set it up how you want.
a simple quick-together script running on my computer:
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am interested in is at
1.7 version when just 2 weeks ago it was at 2.2. Portsnap is also messed
up showing the 1.7 version.
on it and UPDATING tells you to force upgrade everything
that depends on it. So...
You run a portupgrade -fr foobar and after hours and hours of successful
recursive portupgrading, some package (and everything that depend on it)
fails. You dig down to figure out why it failed (let's say, it was a broken
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:54:59PM -0600, Tom Russo wrote:
Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using
portupgrade and its associated tools?
I use portupgrade and have noticed no failures. I have never used
pkg_glob so I cannot address that. I have used portupgrade as
Joe Altman writes:
Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using
portupgrade and its associated tools?
I use portupgrade and have noticed no failures.
I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
is probably a pkgng replacement, I just
On 27/04/2013 14:43, Robert Huff wrote:
I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
is probably a pkgng replacement, I just haven't bothered to check)
and pkg_sort (for which there is no alternative) which is necessary
for certain scripts.
Well, given that pkgng is a
Matthew Seaman writes:
I use portupgrade for two features: portsclean (for which there
is probably a pkgng replacement, I just haven't bothered to check)
and pkg_sort (for which there is no alternative) which is necessary
for certain scripts.
Well, given that pkgng is a
I used to be able to run pkg_glob to see what packages have been updated
since a given date. For example, if I do a big 'portupgrade -fr somepackage'
and wait overnight, then in the morning find a handful had failed, I often
find it helpful to do something like:
pkg_glob -r somepackage -x '=
OK
But modulo CH3CH2OH
You need to learn the neue pkg system
how it differez
On 26 April 2013 16:54, Tom Russo ru...@bogodyn.org wrote:
I used to be able to run pkg_glob to see what packages have been updated
since a given date. For example, if I do a big 'portupgrade -fr
somepackage'
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
| Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
| The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
| FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
| Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
| The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
| FreeBSD
Od: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Do: vermaden verma...@interia.pl;
Wysłane: 17:11 Sobota 2013-02-23
Temat: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg?
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:14:48 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Od: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Do: vermaden verma...@interia.pl;
Wysłane: 17:11 Sobota 2013-02-23
Temat: Re: Why not simplify Copyright at boot/dmesg?
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
| Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993,
| 1994 The Regents
On 02/23/13 12:32, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
| Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989
On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 02/23/13 12:32, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 17:11:50 +0100
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:47:10 +0100, vermaden wrote:
Why not simplify that:
| Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project
On 02/23/13 15:33, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 2/23/2013 1:10 PM, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
snip
It seems the regents copyright claims end in 1994. Perhaps some
underlying piece of code is still in FreeBSD requiring this notice?
Perhaps the creation of FreeBSD and the release of 4.4BSD? Nothing
Thank You all for explanations, it seems logical now ;)
Regards,
vermaden
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
whatever is left over be removed?
Just a thought, not a concern.
I can't think why anyone would want to, and I expect there's a *lot*
left over, certainly their copyright notice appears in many files
in /usr/src.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
.
It would matter when it was released, not merged. If it was merged in
1996 but the code was released in 1994, the copyright's still 1994.
Not that I find it an issue, but could whatever is left over be removed?
Just a thought, not a concern.
I can't think why anyone would want to, and I
On 23/02/2013 23:17, Joshua Isom wrote:
That also ties in with NIH syndrome. Gnu does that a lot just to make
sure they can change to GPLv4 without problems, while Linux is still
GPLv2. It's also not just Berkeley, but other people and
organizations hold copyrights. From a quick glance,
Hello,
I found fsc (http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fsc/) to be extremely
useful.
Unfortunately, I can't get some services to be monitored, fscadm
enable just failes with Could not monitor service.
I don't know how kqueue interaction is working, so I can't guess why
some services can
interaction is working, so I can't guess why
some services can be monitored fine and others not.
How can I start finding out what goes wrong?
How does the rc-name play into that role?
Sorry for the ugly typo in the topic!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface.
When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why ARP
is going on?
Is any sysctl parameter can fix this problem?
-Jin
Internet
a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why
ARP
is going on?
You've told the interface that it can reach 10.227.148.52 via 10.234.37.80,
which is
the IP ue0
...@mac.com
To: Jin Guojun jguo...@sbcglobal.net
Cc: questions freebsd questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, February 13, 2013 12:55:07 PM
Subject: Re: Why ue0 do ARP on non local address when using static route?
On Feb 13, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Jin Guojun wrote:
When attached a Trendent TU2-ET100 USB Ether
), but it has
problem
to talk to a remote network or host (10.227.148.0/24) via eu0 interface.
When a remote host ping this host or this host ping that remote host, ARP
request is always showing up.
A static route is set and remote host is no part of the local sub net, why
ARP
is going on?
Is any
On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Jin Guojun wrote:
/etc/ethers does not help because there is no way resolve the IP by QFHN in
ethers.
I'm not sure what QFHN is, but setting up an entry in /etc/ethers provides
the IP to MAC address mapping that ARP attempts to provide dynamically.
The correct
).
The question is why ARP occurs?
The subnet (10.227.148.0) is not matching with the local network/netmask
(10.234.37.0/24) unless somewhere in the system is using default 255.0.0.0
netmask for 10.0 A class network by mistake.
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
uses FQHN instead
of
IP (10.237.148.52).
The question is why ARP occurs?
The subnet (10.227.148.0) is not matching with the local network/netmask
(10.234.37.0/24) unless somewhere in the system is using default 255.0.0.0
netmask for 10.0 A class network by mistake.
Your first message
Den 06.02.2013 00:03, skrev Per olof Ljungmark:
Hi,
Upgraded a system from 8.3 to 9-STABLE and did make delete-old-libs
afterwards. System has around thirty ports installed and all except
bacula-client upgraded gracefully.
Why does it want libz.so.5 when libz.so.6 is present? I'm pretty sure
Hi,
Upgraded a system from 8.3 to 9-STABLE and did make delete-old-libs
afterwards. System has around thirty ports installed and all except
bacula-client upgraded gracefully.
Why does it want libz.so.5 when libz.so.6 is present? I'm pretty sure
I'm missing the obvious here...
Linking bacula
Hello,
I have an old Alix appliance on a CompactFlash, usually I keep / mounted
read-only to preserve the flash device as longer as possible.
I have installed some packages today, and now I can't mount / read-only
again, usually it was working.
markand@Ananas ~ $ sudo mount -u -r /
mount:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:32:46 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
It's my understanding that the sequence of numbers one sees output when
shutdown is issued reflect writes of cached items.
Is that correct?
If so, why does:
sync
shutdown -r now
still show cached items being written?
Issuing
kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 0
kern.ipc.shmall: 1310720
kern.ipc.shmseg: 128
kern.ipc.shmmni: 192
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ipc.shmmax: 70
kern.features.sysv_shm: 1
kern.features.posix_shm: 1
There are 17GB free memory as reported by top(1).
Why shmget fails despite kern.ipc.shmmax is being high enough
kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 0
kern.ipc.shmall: 1310720
kern.ipc.shmseg: 128
kern.ipc.shmmni: 192
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ipc.shmmax: 70
kern.features.sysv_shm: 1
kern.features.posix_shm: 1
There are 17GB free memory as reported by top(1).
Why shmget fails despite kern.ipc.shmmax is being high enough
: 1310720
kern.ipc.shmseg: 128
kern.ipc.shmmni: 192
kern.ipc.shmmin: 1
kern.ipc.shmmax: 70
kern.features.sysv_shm: 1
kern.features.posix_shm: 1
There are 17GB free memory as reported by top(1).
Why shmget fails despite kern.ipc.shmmax is being high enough?
Experimentally I found
Le Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:54:45 -0700,
Yuri y...@rawbw.com a écrit :
RELENG_9 is supposed to represent the latest branch of 9.1. De facto,
code says it is PRERELEASE (sys/conf/newvers.sh).
But freebsd.org on its front page says 9.1 is at RC-2.
So how can I get RC-2 through cvsup except through
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC?
This looks strange to me.
Yuri
Yuri yuri at rawbw.com writes:
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC
Le Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:19 -0700,
Yuri y...@rawbw.com a écrit :
RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1
Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as stable 9.X branch, why then
9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than
RC? This looks strange
RELENG_9 is supposed to represent the latest branch of 9.1. De facto,
code says it is PRERELEASE (sys/conf/newvers.sh).
But freebsd.org on its front page says 9.1 is at RC-2.
So how can I get RC-2 through cvsup except through RELENG_9 which gives
PRERELEASE ?
Yuri
[ Gary Aitken wrote on Wed 22.Aug'12 at 23:39:16 -0600 ]
Can anyone shed light on why /etc/namedb is a symlink to
/var/named/etc/namedb?
It seems to me this is general configuration stuff which should be in
/etc/namedb on the root partition, not on /var. I thought /var was used
Can anyone shed light on why /etc/namedb is a symlink to /var/named/etc/namedb?
It seems to me this is general configuration stuff which should be in
/etc/namedb on the root partition, not on /var. I thought /var was used for
things like logs, process ids of running processes, etc.
Gary
El día Wednesday, August 22, 2012 a las 11:39:16PM -0600, Gary Aitken escribió:
Can anyone shed light on why /etc/namedb is a symlink to
/var/named/etc/namedb?
It seems to me this is general configuration stuff which should be in
/etc/namedb on the root partition, not on /var. I thought
On 23/08/2012 06:39, Gary Aitken wrote:
Can anyone shed light on why /etc/namedb is a symlink to
/var/named/etc/namedb?
Because named chroots into /var/named in the default configuration.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http
I think it's likely that it is a 64-bit installation.
Not sure about that. How could the amd64 OS be installed
and run on a i386 machine?
it cannot.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So
I tried both:
you've got into wrong directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
you've got into wrong directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Aug 7 02:44:36 2012
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:41:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I
...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on
your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit
distribution on your
: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu I686_CPU
(I also tried them both lowercase, like i686_cpu)
But all of these fail:
GENERIC:
make LINT
vi LINT
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jason Usher jushe...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
an i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working.
So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, RW wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
an i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working.
So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6555122 Jul 12 23:02 libslatec_p.a
#
profile library or -fpic library?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
non-profiling,
while it contains more symbols. Why?
While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
experiments with the profiling library.
I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
is that the profiling library is smaller:
# ls -al
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:15:45AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6555122 Jul 12 23:02 libslatec_p.a
#
profile library or -fpic library?
I think profile:
=== Building for slatec-4.1
Warning: Object
Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.com writes:
A question I would like to ask, if no one minds.
Whys is Gluster not available in FreeBSD?
It is that Gluster just cant run on FreeBSD, or no one can port it?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GlusterFS
___
While updating my port (math/slatec) to use
the new OPTIONS framework, I did some
experiments with the profiling library.
I don't know much about this, so what surprised me
is that the profiling library is smaller:
# ls -al lib*a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6582354 Jul 12 22:56 libslatec.a
U i1mach_
U sin
U zbesh_
T zbesy_
Why the difference?
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jul 12 17:34:12 2012
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:31:31 +0100
From: Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
while it contains more symbols. Why?
While
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:52:18 +0100
From: Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
Subject: Re: profiling library smaller than non-profiling,
while it contains more symbols. Why?
Also, the library compiled on amd64 has lots more
symbols than if compiled on ia64.
This is _not_
:/usr/home /mnt
[tcp] xx:/usr/home: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
#
On the server, in /var/log/messages I see this:
mountd[29140]: mount request from nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn from unprivileged port
So I infer that the 'unprivileged port' bit is the problem
is on the client (the VM guest) I get this:
# mount xx:/usr/home /mnt
[tcp] xx:/usr/home: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why =
Client credential too weak
#
Hi Walter
Are you root when mounting on the client?
From looking at your prompt # I think you are, but I ask just to make sure.
You can
Everyone
But when I try to mount is on the client (the VM guest) I get this:
# mount xx:/usr/home /mnt [tcp] xx:/usr/home: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC:
Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak #
On the server, in /var/log/messages I see this:
mountd
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:55:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Are you root when mounting on the client?
From looking at your prompt # I think you are, but I ask just to make
sure.
You can also take a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-
nfs.html
in the
On 07/06/2012 07:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:55:27 +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote:
Are you root when mounting on the client?
From looking at your prompt # I think you are, but I ask just to make
sure.
You can also take a look at
have copied a resolv.conf into the
jails for future use, but did not enable NAT from the start.
The issue disappeared when I commented out the nameserver entries and
switched NAT off again, i.e., I could login using ssh in a matter of
seconds, not minutes.
Now to the followup: Why does ssh
and
switched NAT off again, i.e., I could login using ssh in a matter of
seconds, not minutes.
Now to the followup: Why does ssh and emacs! require DNS for entirely local
connections or just to be started?
Anyway, thanks for that hint, cheers,
--
Christopher
TZ: GMT + 2h
signature.asc
Description: PGP
,
logging into the jails or starting emacs became snappy again.
Why? Why does ipnatting jails which should be connected via the same lo0
on 10.0.0.0 have any impact? Don't get me wrong, I am not complaining
and it solved an issue which gave me kind of headaches, but I would like
to understand
Christopher J. Ruwe writes:
On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some
qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on
10.0.0.0.
While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one
pecularity I have failed to pinpoint: When launching
I am not sure, as long as clients would be treated seriously!
I look at large corporate software vendors and see them treating
customers seriously maybe 2% of the time at best. In this case, most of
I assumed FreeBSD team are OK and would fit in this 2% or even those 0.2%
am i wrong?
I would see a problem with that -- not because I don't think FreeBSD is
worth it. I do, and I think it is worth more than that, in fact. The
true.
biggest problem with what you propose, though, is that it would destroy
the social factors in development of the FreeBSD system that make it
On Friday 22 June 2012 07:04:35 Bernt Hansson wrote:
I want to whish all a very mery Midsummer's Eve and Midsummer's Day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midsummer#Sweden
I appreciate the sentiment but it's midwinter here ;)
Jonathan
___
was never again able to boot any OS/2, and I sure tried.
Closed source was one severe drawback, why I certainly prefer either Linux or
FreeBSD.
Actually there is a continuation/successor to OS/2, namely eComStation
(www.ecomstation.com) but no way would I go that way!
Either Linux or FreeBSD
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:31 -0500, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered.
This has not been decided in court yet.
In which court not? Of which
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 21 06:07:49 2012
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.fr
Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kpn...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Why
1 - 100 of 2975 matches
Mail list logo
