Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error

2003-07-11 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
- Original Message - From: Kris Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error I am upgrading from png port: png-1.2.5 needs updating (port has 1.2.5_2) to png port 1.2.5_2

Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error

2003-07-11 Thread Kris Yates
My analog installation is fine. Some clients prefer Webalizer, so I have multiple stats available. Thanks though... Kris admin wrote: by the way - analog is much better for webstats from my perspective. might wanna check it out. - Noah to png port 1.2.5_2. make seems fine, the

Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error

2003-07-11 Thread Kris Yates
: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error I am upgrading from png port: png-1.2.5 needs updating (port has 1.2.5_2) to png port 1.2.5_2. make seems fine, the following error occurs on the port make install: cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -I. -DPNG_USE_PNGGCCRD -c

Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error

2003-07-11 Thread dick hoogendijk
On 11 Jul Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I often upgrade all of my ports to the latest revision with just portupgrade -ra Is that enough? Shouldn't this be portupgrade -rRa ? -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.8 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody)

Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error

2003-07-11 Thread Joshua Oreman
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 12:31:55AM +0200 or thereabouts, dick hoogendijk wrote: On 11 Jul Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: I often upgrade all of my ports to the latest revision with just portupgrade -ra Is that enough? Shouldn't this be portupgrade -rRa ? IMO, since you already have -a