Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chip Camden]

On Apr 22 2010 16:08, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
> 
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> > I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow.  Is there
> > a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it?  The Handbook didn't
> > seem to say anything on the subject.
> 
> Try this sequence:
> 
> portsdb -Fu
> pkgdb -aF
> 
> (Additional runs of "pkgdb -F" with manual intervention might be needed if 
> all cannot be auto-repaired.  :-)
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> -Chuck

Thanks much!

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chuck Swiger]

Hi--

On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
> I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow.  Is there
> a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it?  The Handbook didn't
> seem to say anything on the subject.

Try this sequence:

portsdb -Fu
pkgdb -aF

(Additional runs of "pkgdb -F" with manual intervention might be needed if all 
cannot be auto-repaired.  :-)

Regards,
-- 
-Chuck

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chip Camden]

On Apr 22 2010 12:07, Chip Camden wrote:
> On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden
> >  wrote:
> > > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64
> > 
> > With a recently updated ports tree?  What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the 
> > Makefile?
> > 
> > :g
> 
> # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/04/21 19:53:03 pgj Exp $
> 
> Now I'm having another problem.  I was able to do portupgrade for
> everything, but when I try to startx, xmonad complains about not haveing
> limgmp.so.8, which is what the old math/libgmp4 port created.  I've done
> a make clean/deinstall/reinstall of ghc and xmonad, but that didn't help.
> 

I solved this by deinstalling math/gmp, reinstalling math/libgmp4,
copying libgmp.so.8 to another directory, deinstalling math/libgmp4,
reinstalling math/gmp, then copying my saved libgmp.so.8 back to
/usr/local/lib.

I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow.  Is there
a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it?  The Handbook didn't
seem to say anything on the subject.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chip Camden]

On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden
>  wrote:
> > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64
> 
> With a recently updated ports tree?  What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the Makefile?
> 
> :g

# $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/04/21 19:53:03 pgj Exp $

Now I'm having another problem.  I was able to do portupgrade for
everything, but when I try to startx, xmonad complains about not haveing
limgmp.so.8, which is what the old math/libgmp4 port created.  I've done
a make clean/deinstall/reinstall of ghc and xmonad, but that didn't help.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Eitan Adler]

>
> But it's working today.  I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a
> delay in that process?
Yes - there is. I've found it takes a couple of hours to get the
newest updates but once in a while it takes longer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chip Camden]

On Apr 22 2010 10:24, Gabor PALI wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden
>  wrote:
> > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something.
> 
> Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on
> amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms.
> Otherwise it must be okay.
> 
> Cheers,
> g.

I'm on 8.0-RELEASE, amd64. 

But it's working today.  I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a
delay in that process?  Yesterday it didn't get it, today it did.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Gabor PALI]

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden
 wrote:
> lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something.

Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on
amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms.
Otherwise it must be okay.

Cheers,
g.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Chip Camden]

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:46PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:
> 
> > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> > 
> > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
> > lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected
> > in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues.
> 
> A fix has been committed :)
> 
> -- 
> IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
>   "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
> FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:

> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> 
> Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
> lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected
> in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues.

A fix has been committed :)

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300
Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:

> > I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC
> > (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into
> > periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building
> > with NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end
> > build functional issues.   
> 
> Problem is I need an automated solution.
> I'm testing it now on QAT with ccache disabled.

Same error.

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700
Garrett Cooper  wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM,  
> wrote:
> > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> >>
> >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
> >
> > As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
> > fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used
> > to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains
> > to be seen...
> 
> As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use
> on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact
> that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster.

ATM no, the new cluster is in works, not yet used, QAT is running on a
single machine, with ccache.

> I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC
> (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into
> periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with
> NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build
> functional issues. 

Problem is I need an automated solution.
I'm testing it now on QAT with ccache disabled.

> Someone else who knows more about ccache could provide a better
> explanation of what's going on because my ranting about this would
> only be me talking out of my rear :).

Yes, please.

> More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here:
> http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html

Thanks.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM,   wrote:
> On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
>>
>> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.
>
> As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
> fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used
> to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains
> to be seen...

As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use
on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact
that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster.
I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC
(basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into
periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with
NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build
functional issues. Someone else who knows more about ccache could
provide a better explanation of what's going on because my ranting
about this would only be me talking out of my rear :).
More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here:
http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html
Cheers,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[freebsd-ports]

On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.
> 
> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.

As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be
fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used
to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains
to be seen...

M
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed.

Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly
lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in
our -exp run because of being masked by other issues.

It will take a few days to fix  lang/ghc.

I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44.


As a workaround, keep your old gmp library
in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg; both portmaster and portupdate have an
option for this.


X11 is still in work, the other are waiting for it.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Leslie Jensen]

Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28:

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen  wrote:



It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?


http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg

In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating
packages -- porters have hit some snags with updating graphics/png,
zlib in base and lang/php5, mostly -- there's still xorg, gnome, and
kde to go...).

Honestly, apart from the zlib and png upgrades, there's been little
churn though for me (XFCE4 user), and I still update without much
issue on a periodic basis every week.

HTH,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Ok! Thank you. I'll keep on waiting then. I'm also using XFCE and it's 
running fine. After having been through a lot of rebuilding of ports and 
the problems that might turn up, I feel it's safer to wait until someone 
gives the go ahead :-)


/Leslie

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:25:06 +0200
Leslie Jensen  wrote:

> 
> 
> It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?

As written in my previous two or three mails on the subject, for now
yes.

Xorg is in the second phase of testing, and the rest are waitgin for
it. I can't give a firm ETA yet.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen  wrote:
>
>
> It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?

http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg

In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating
packages -- porters have hit some snags with updating graphics/png,
zlib in base and lang/php5, mostly -- there's still xorg, gnome, and
kde to go...).

Honestly, apart from the zlib and png upgrades, there's been little
churn though for me (XFCE4 user), and I still update without much
issue on a periodic basis every week.

HTH,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Leslie Jensen]

It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now?

Thanks

/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:03:22 -0700
Ted Faber  wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands
> > ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA
> > is 6-7 April. 
> 
> I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check.  Are ports still
> unstable?

ATM no, as it's apparent from the message bellow.

Update to that message:
- Gnome and KDE are ready
- Xorg is believed to be ready, an -exp run on pointy is beginning
  today.


On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700
Charlie Kester  wrote:

> On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:  
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands
> >ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is
> >6-7 April.
> >
> >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared
> >lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.
> >
> >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done,
> >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing /
> >fixing.
> >
> >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and
> >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built
> >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even
> >fixed. We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the
> >problems.
> >
> >
> >Thank you,
> >
> >With hat:portmgr@  
> 
> 
> Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the
> original ETA can we get a current status report?  Is the portstree
> considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA?  


From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu 
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu 
Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ]  Ports unstable for the next 10 days
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:31:33 +0300

Just a status update:

PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed.

Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is
working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems.

>>>> still work to do  

I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow
morning.

>>> Gnome -exp done, there's a showstopper on amd64 that we weren't aware
>>> of. about 40 fixesso far. An other -exp needed.  
>>>> KDE in progress.  


Packages status:
- i386: 
  - 6 after png and curl
  - 7 after png and curl
  - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished
>>>>finished  
  - 9 pacakges are from middle March
>>> from 9 Apr.  
- amd64:
  - 6 packages are post png and curl
  - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow
  - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we
won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of
resources).
>>> in progress, with ports from yesterday  
  - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib
problem).
>>>> nope, still old packages.  

In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome
and KDE now it's a good moment.


>>> So no clear ETA yet, a few days more.  


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ted Faber]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports
> are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7
> April. 

I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check.  Are ports still unstable?

-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber   PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG


pgp3xtbXIGKg8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Jeremy Chadwick]

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500
> > Antonio Olivares  wrote:
> >
> >  [ .. ]
> >
> >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod
> >>         ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
> >>         ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set
> >> SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src
> >>
> >>         ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the
> >>                IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again.
> >>
> >> ===>>> Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed
> >> ===>>> Aborting update
> >
> >  [ .. ]
> >> What should I do in this case?
> >
> > First, please don't top post.
> >
> > Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that
> > port, being a kernel module, needs them.
> > See:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html
> >
> > --
> > IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
> >  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
> > FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
> >
> 
> Dear Ion-Mihai,
> 
> I have installed cvsup, but I don't really understand the page that I
> was refered to
> 
> ===> SECURITY REPORT:
>   This port has installed the following files which may act as network
>   servers and may therefore pose a remote security risk to the system.
> /usr/local/sbin/cvsupd
> /usr/local/bin/cvsup
> /usr/local/bin/cvpasswd
> 
>   If there are vulnerabilities in these programs there may be a security
>   risk to the system. FreeBSD makes no guarantee about the security of
>   ports included in the Ports Collection. Please type 'make deinstall'
>   to deinstall the port if this is a concern.
> 
>   For more information, and contact details about the security
>   status of this software, see the following webpage:
> http://www.cvsup.org/
> ===>  Cleaning for ezm3-1.1_2
> ===>  Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4
> 
> I have installed it using ports system, but still get same error as
> above.  I try to use cvsup the file, I get nothing, I try to go to the
> port that refuses to update and make install clean and it says source
> not available or refused?
> 
> I have used ports before and had no problems, I don't know what to do.
> 
> Thank you and others who have provided help.
> 
> *Sorry for top posting

You didn't need to install cvsup from ports.  csup in the base system
will work just fine; it's the official replacement for cvsup.  itetcu@
was pointing you to the documentation describing the procedure for using
cvsup/csup.

Based on the thread so far, my understanding is that you need to
download the FreeBSD source repository (kernel, base system, etc.),
because the port you're trying to build (which is a kernel module)
requires it.

There are two cvsup files associated with the source repo:

/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile

Which you should use depends on if you're running -RELEASE or -STABLE.
The most important part in those files is the "*default release=cvs
tag=XXX".  Specifically the "tag=XXX" part.

8.0-RELEASE's tag is RELENG_8_0, while 8.0-STABLE's tag is RELENG_8.
So which tag you use should be based on what version you wish to run.

So at this point, you should:

1) pkg_delete ezm3-1.1_2
2) pkg_delete cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4
3) csup -h  -L 2 /usr/share/example/cvsup/stable-supfile
   or
   csup -h  -L 2 /usr/share/example/cvsup/standard-supfile

This will populate /usr/src on your system.  From there, you should be
able to build ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod as normal without any problem.

Does this help explain things better?

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick   j...@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Antonio Olivares]

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500
> Antonio Olivares  wrote:
>
>  [ .. ]
>
>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod
>>         ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
>>         ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set
>> SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src
>>
>>         ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the
>>                IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again.
>>
>> ===>>> Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed
>> ===>>> Aborting update
>
>  [ .. ]
>> What should I do in this case?
>
> First, please don't top post.
>
> Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that
> port, being a kernel module, needs them.
> See:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html
>
> --
> IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
>  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
> FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
>

Dear Ion-Mihai,

I have installed cvsup, but I don't really understand the page that I
was refered to

===> SECURITY REPORT:
  This port has installed the following files which may act as network
  servers and may therefore pose a remote security risk to the system.
/usr/local/sbin/cvsupd
/usr/local/bin/cvsup
/usr/local/bin/cvpasswd

  If there are vulnerabilities in these programs there may be a security
  risk to the system. FreeBSD makes no guarantee about the security of
  ports included in the Ports Collection. Please type 'make deinstall'
  to deinstall the port if this is a concern.

  For more information, and contact details about the security
  status of this software, see the following webpage:
http://www.cvsup.org/
===>  Cleaning for ezm3-1.1_2
===>  Cleaning for cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4

I have installed it using ports system, but still get same error as
above.  I try to use cvsup the file, I get nothing, I try to go to the
port that refuses to update and make install clean and it says source
not available or refused?

I have used ports before and had no problems, I don't know what to do.

Thank you and others who have provided help.

*Sorry for top posting


Regards,

Antonio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500
Antonio Olivares  wrote:

 [ .. ]

> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod
> ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
> ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set  
> SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src
> 
> ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the  
>IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again.
> 
> ===>>> Update for sysutils/fusefs-kmod failed
> ===>>> Aborting update  

 [ .. ]  
> What should I do in this case?

First, please don't top post.

Second, you don't seem to have the base sources installed and that
port, being a kernel module, needs them.
See:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Antonio Olivares]

Garret,

I have tried the command out, but it apparently does not do the job:

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for graphics/graphviz
===>>> Launching child to update libgnomeui-2.24.1_1
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/libgnomeui
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for x11-toolkits/libgnomeui in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for x11-toolkits/libgnomeui from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Launching child to update gvfs-1.2.3_2
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/gvfs
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for devel/gvfs in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/gvfs from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Launching child to update libsoup-2.26.3_2
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libsoup
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for devel/libsoup in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/libsoup from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Launching child to update sqlite3-3.6.14.2 to sqlite3-3.6.19
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> sqlite3-3.6.14.2

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/databases/sqlite3
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for databases/sqlite3 in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for databases/sqlite3 from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Recursive 'make config' check complete for databases/sqlite3
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> sqlite3-3.6.14.2

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/libsoup
===>>> Launching child to update gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/security/gnome-keyring
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for security/gnome-keyring in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for security/gnome-keyring from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Launching child to update libgcrypt-1.4.4 to libgcrypt-1.4.5
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 >>
libgcrypt-1.4.4

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/security/libgcrypt
===>>> Gathering dependency list for security/libgcrypt from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/libgcrypt
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 >>
libgcrypt-1.4.4

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for security/gnome-keyring
===>>> Launching child to update libtasn1-2.3 to libtasn1-2.4
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 >>
libtasn1-2.3

===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/security/libtasn1
===>>> Gathering dependency list for security/libtasn1 from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/libtasn1
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1 >>
libtasn1-2.3

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for security/gnome-keyring
===>>> Recursive 'make config' check complete for security/gnome-keyring
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2 >> gnome-keyring-2.26.3_1

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/libsoup
===>>> Recursive 'make config' check complete for devel/libsoup
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> libsoup-2.26.3_2

===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for devel/gvfs
===>>> Launching child to update sysutils/fusefs-kmod
jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >>
devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >> libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 >>
gvfs-1.2.3_2 >> sysutils/fu

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Antonio Olivares
 wrote:
> Ion-Mihai,
>
> Does this fix the following issue?
>
> I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2
>
>  I try to use konqueror and I get
>
>  There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror.
>  The diagnostics is:
>  Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so:
>  (Shared object "libjpeg.so.10" not found, required by "libkhtml.so.7")
>
> Other programs like kile and k3b don't work because of the same
> message or others.  I did not know about this, otherwise I would not
> have tried to install these programs in the first place, till the
> coast was clear :(
>
> Thanks though, I saw the message a little bit late :(

Nope. You need to update all of jpeg. See UPDATING for more
details (but substitute this for the portmaster directions: "
portmaster -r 'jpeg-*' ".
HTH,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Antonio Olivares]

Ion-Mihai,

Does this fix the following issue?

I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2

 I try to use konqueror and I get

 There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror.
 The diagnostics is:
 Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so:
 (Shared object "libjpeg.so.10" not found, required by "libkhtml.so.7")

Other programs like kile and k3b don't work because of the same
message or others.  I did not know about this, otherwise I would not
have tried to install these programs in the first place, till the
coast was clear :(

Thanks though, I saw the message a little bit late :(

Regards,

Antonio




On 4/5/10, Ion-Mihai Tetcu  wrote:
> Just a status update:
>
> PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed.
>
> Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is
> working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems.
>
> I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow
> morning.
>
>
> Packages status:
> - i386:
>   - 6 after png and curl
>   - 7 after png and curl
>   - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished
>   - 9 pacakges are from middle March
> - amd64:
>   - 6 packages are post png and curl
>   - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow
>   - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we
> won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of
> resources).
>   - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib
> problem).
>
>
> In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome
> and KDE now it's a good moment.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> --
> IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
>   "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
> FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

Just a status update:

PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed.

Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is
working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems.

I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow
morning.


Packages status:
- i386: 
  - 6 after png and curl
  - 7 after png and curl
  - an 8 incremental build is in progress and should be shortly finished
  - 9 pacakges are from middle March
- amd64:
  - 6 packages are post png and curl
  - 7 build is in progress and will be finished tomorrow
  - 8 last build was done in the middle of the png update/fixes; we
won't run an other before Xorg, KDE and Gnome go in (for lack of
resources).
  - 9 build in progress (with sources that are believed to fix the zlib
problem).


In other words, if you wish to update without waiting for Xorg, Gnome
and KDE now it's a good moment.


HTH,

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Doug Barton]

On 03/29/10 12:21, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton  > wrote:
> 
> Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip
> it internally in any case.
> 
> 
> Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked
> for me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated.

I'm sorry to repeat myself, but what you're describing is a result of
the fact that in the past the glob code for the -r option was broken. As
of version 2.20 it is no longer broken, and the * is not necessary
(although it won't hurt anything).


hope this helps,

Doug

-- 

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Adam Vande More]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton  wrote:

> Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip
> it internally in any case.
>

Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked for
me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated.


> pkg_info |grep png
linux-f10-png-1.2.37 RPM of the PNG lib (Linux Fedora 10)
png-1.2.42  Library for manipulating PNG images
scr2png-1.2_3   Converts the output of "vidcontrol -p" to PNG
> portmaster -r png-
===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
===>>> Try portmaster --help
> portmaster -r 'png-*'
===>>> Currently installed version: png-1.2.42
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/graphics/png
===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports
===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for graphics/png in background
===>>> Gathering dependency list for graphics/png from ports
===>>> No dependencies for graphics/png
===>>> Checking ports that depend on png-1.2.42
===>>> Launching child to update akonadi-1.2.1_1
^C
===>>> Build/Install for graphics/png exiting due to signal


-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Doug Barton]

On 03/29/10 02:53, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A
> glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions,

I wasn't going for a rigorous definition here. :)  However, "simplified"
is the correct idea.

> The previous method I described works, and works well:
> 
> portmaster -r 'png-*'

Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip
it internally in any case.

> Not sure why graphics/png doesn't work though; hrrm...

The -r option is only relevant to an installed port.


Doug

-- 

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Doug Barton]

On 03/29/10 02:27, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
   portmaster -r graphics/png
>> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port
>> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of
>> that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just
>> committed.
> 
> I'm confused. The manual actually says:
> 
>  [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg
> 
> 
> When I try your suggestion I get this:
> 
> # portmaster -r png-
> 
> ===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
> ===>>> Try portmaster --help

Are you using portmaster version 2.20?



-- 

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Rene Ladan]

2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper :
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> portmaster -r png-
>>
>> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just
>> have missed it in the docs).
>>
>> I would have used
>>
>>  portmaster -r graphics/png
>
>    And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be:
>
> portmaster -r 'png-*'
>
>    Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg
> instructions, those ones are wrong as well.

Given that the PORTREVISION of all dependent ports are bumped, a simple
'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' should suffice. Or am I missing something?

Rene
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Doug Barton]

On 03/28/10 19:34, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> portmaster -r png-
>>
>> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just
>> have missed it in the docs).
>>
>> I would have used
>>
>>  portmaster -r graphics/png

That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port
directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of
that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just
committed.

> And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be:
> 
> portmaster -r 'png-*'

The * at the end of that is not necessary. In fact, portmaster strips it
off before creating the actual pattern to feed to find. The current
version of the instructions are correct. The - at the end of png is not
strictly necessary, but it will serve to disambiguate the port name if
there exists a pngfoo-1.23.


hth,

Doug

-- 

... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Rene Ladan  wrote:
> 2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper :
>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>>> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:

 portmaster -r png-
>>>
>>> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just
>>> have missed it in the docs).
>>>
>>> I would have used
>>>
>>>  portmaster -r graphics/png
>>
>>    And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be:
>>
>> portmaster -r 'png-*'
>>
>>    Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg
>> instructions, those ones are wrong as well.
>
> Given that the PORTREVISION of all dependent ports are bumped, a simple
> 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' should suffice. Or am I missing something?

You're absolutely correct, but I think that these directions were
written with the intent that they would be simple one-off directions
for upgrading just graphics/png dependent libs.
HTH,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
> On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

  portmaster -r graphics/png
>>
>> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port
>> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of
>> that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just
>> committed.
>
> I'm confused. The manual actually says:
>
>  [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg
>
>
> When I try your suggestion I get this:
>
> # portmaster -r png-
>
> ===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
> ===>>> Try portmaster --help
>
>
> And this doesn't work either:
>
> # portmaster -r graphics/png
>
> ===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
> ===>>> Try portmaster --help
>
>
> So, as you say the pkg pattern is broken, but also 'port directory' doesn't
> work either unlike your suggestions above. It would be nice for both pkg and
> directory patterns to be more consistently available, but in the meantime
> readers of UPDATING are going to be confused.

Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A
glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions, made available
via fnmatch(3) and glob(3) ... The previous method I described works,
and works well:

portmaster -r 'png-*'

Not sure why graphics/png doesn't work though; hrrm...
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:

  portmaster -r graphics/png

That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port
directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of
that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just
committed.


I'm confused. The manual actually says:

 [-R] -r name/glob of port in /var/db/pkg


When I try your suggestion I get this:

# portmaster -r png-

===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
===>>> Try portmaster --help


And this doesn't work either:

# portmaster -r graphics/png

===>>> No valid installed port, or port directory given
===>>> Try portmaster --help


So, as you say the pkg pattern is broken, but also 'port directory' doesn't 
work either unlike your suggestions above. It would be nice for both pkg and 
directory patterns to be more consistently available, but in the meantime 
readers of UPDATING are going to be confused.


Ari Maniatis





--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
> On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>
>> The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib
>> version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.
>
> The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong
> text, wrong instructions for portmaster.
>
>
>
> 20090328:
>  AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
>  AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
>
>  The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1.  Please rebuild all
>  ports that depend on it.
>
>  If you use portmaster:
>
>        portmaster -r jpeg-
>
>  If you use portupgrade:
>
>        portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg

The text has been updated:

20100328:
  AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
  AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org

  The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1.  Please rebuild all
  ports that depend on it.

  If you use portmaster:

portmaster -r png-

  If you use portupgrade:

portupgrade -fr graphics/png

Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Garrett Cooper]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> portmaster -r png-
>
> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just
> have missed it in the docs).
>
> I would have used
>
>  portmaster -r graphics/png

And yes, the directions are still wrong; it should be:

portmaster -r 'png-*'

Similarly since this was just a copy-paste of the jpeg
instructions, those ones are wrong as well.
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:

portmaster -r png-


Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just 
have missed it in the docs).

I would have used

  portmaster -r graphics/png

Ari

--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:

The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib
version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.


The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, 
wrong instructions for portmaster.



20090328:
  AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
  AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org

  The png library has been updated to version 1.4.1.  Please rebuild all
  ports that depend on it.

  If you use portmaster:

portmaster -r jpeg-

  If you use portupgrade:

portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg





--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Michael Powell]

Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports
> are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7
> April.
> 
> The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib
> version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.
> 
> We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done,
> and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing.
> 
> Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and
> http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built
> to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed.
> We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> With hat: portmgr@
> 

Thank you very much for this notification. It surely is nice to know this.

-Mike


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

Hi,


As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports
are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7
April. 

The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib
version bump), with about 5000 ports affected.

We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done,
and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing.

Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and
http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built
to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed.
We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems.


Thank you,

With hat:   portmgr@

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> ite...@freebsd.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature