On 2007-10-30 20:39, Howard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
>> You could possibly also put "bash -l && exit" in your .shrc, which would
>> exit if bash exited successfully. I haven't tested it, but it should
>> work.
>
> or 'exec bash -l' which will replace the existing
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:39:00PM +, Howard Jones wrote:
> Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
>> You could possibly also put "bash -l && exit" in your .shrc, which would
>> exit if bash exited successfully. I haven't tested it, but it should
>> work.
>>
> or 'exec bash -l' which will replace the exis
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
You could possibly also put "bash -l && exit" in your .shrc, which would
exit if bash exited successfully. I haven't tested it, but it should
work.
or 'exec bash -l' which will replace the existing shell with bash in
memory, rather than run it from it as a subprocess.
