>-Original Message-
>From: Erik Trulsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 22 June 2005 10:11
>To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD
>Cc: Chuck Swiger; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld...
[snip]
>> Most of the apps I'
ns@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld...
>
> [snip]
>
> > Normally, you don't use the profiled versions of libraries
> > unless you are
> > running a binary which links against them. If you are
> > running a binary which
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2005 19:25
> To: Roland Smith
> Cc: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld...
[snip]
> Normally, you don't
> -Original Message-
> From: Roland Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2005 19:07
> To: Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: -DNOPROFILE with make buildworld...
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:49:06P
Roland Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:49:06PM +0100, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
I've cvsup'ed my source tree, and stepping through the instructions in
the handbook I note that it recommends running make buildworld with
-DNOPROFILE (or specifying it in make.conf
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:49:06PM +0100, Harrison Peter CSA BIRKENHEAD wrote:
> I've cvsup'ed my source tree, and stepping through the instructions in
> the handbook I note that it recommends running make buildworld with
> -DNOPROFILE (or specifying it in make.conf). I&#
ning make buildworld with -DNOPROFILE (or
specifying it in make.conf). I'm not clear what the impact of running profiled
libraries is against non-profiled libraries. I've done a quick search via
google and through the list archives without success.
Could anyone explain the difference for
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
What exactly does this make.conf-flag do:
NOPROFILE= true# Avoid compiling profiled libraries
What are "profiled" libraries?
GH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
Ok, thank you very much for enlightening me! :-)
GH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
y from gprof(1), profiled libraries are
> for measuring how much CPU time is spent in each suboutine? And, as a
> regular user (not a developer or benchmarker), I don't need this and can
> use -DNOPROFILE for not building profiled libraries?
Yes, that's the whole point of NOPRO
aries
> >
> > What are "profiled" libraries?
>
> /usr/lib/lib*_p.{a,so}
>
> See gprof(1)
So, if I understand it correctly from gprof(1), profiled libraries are
for measuring how much CPU time is spent in each suboutine? And, as a
regular user (not a developer
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:52:32PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what this make.conf-flag is for:
>
> NOPROFILE= true# Avoid compiling profiled libraries
>
> What are "profiled" libraries?
/usr/lib/lib*_p.{a,so}
See gprof(1)
> GH
--
Cordula's Web. http://
Hi,
I was wondering what this make.conf-flag is for:
NOPROFILE= true# Avoid compiling profiled libraries
What are "profiled" libraries?
GH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To un
What exactly does this make.conf-flag do:
NOPROFILE= true# Avoid compiling profiled libraries
What are "profiled" libraries?
GH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, se
14 matches
Mail list logo
