Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-26 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:32:18PM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote: Whereas I intend to run this server as a Postfix server w/ Courier IMAP, authentication through PAM/LDAP it would seem that I should stay at 4.10 then. Is this correct or not? Correct. 4.x doesn't support nsswitch.conf, so

4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Curtis Vaughan
Ok, it looks as though cvsup from 4.8 to 4.10 has been successful. Now, first off I want to say that I want this server to be a second Postfix / Courier IMAP server (our other is on a RedHat server, but that's irrelevant). I feel that I should go ahead and first upgrade to 5.x and then install

Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, it looks as though cvsup from 4.8 to 4.10 has been successful. Now, first off I want to say that I want this server to be a second Postfix / Courier IMAP server (our other is on a RedHat server, but that's irrelevant). I feel that I should go ahead and first upgrade to

Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Curtis Vaughan
On 25 Aug, 2004, at 12:11, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, it looks as though cvsup from 4.8 to 4.10 has been successful. Now, first off I want to say that I want this server to be a second Postfix / Courier IMAP server (our other is on a RedHat server, but that's

Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Bill Moran
Curtis Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 25 Aug, 2004, at 12:11, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, it looks as though cvsup from 4.8 to 4.10 has been successful. Now, first off I want to say that I want this server to be a second Postfix / Courier

Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Steven Friedrich
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 02:52 pm, Curtis Vaughan wrote: Ok, it looks as though cvsup from 4.8 to 4.10 has been successful. Now, first off I want to say that I want this server to be a second Postfix / Courier IMAP server (our other is on a RedHat server, but that's irrelevant). I feel

Re: 4.8 4.10 successful. Now 5.x?

2004-08-25 Thread Curtis Vaughan
4.x is really a great unix. Very stable and plenty capable. If the software you're hoping to run REQUIRES features in 5.x, I recommend installing it directly. Meantime, I'd use mobile racks and install 4.x on one so I could learn more about maintaining FreeBSD, installing ports/packages, etc.