Re: A few X questions (small X load for small drive needed)

2004-06-25 Thread Malcolm Kay
On Saturday 26 June 2004 06:51, Joe Schmoe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
> laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
>
> It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
> all.
>
> Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
> and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
> have a simple GUI to run opera and terminal windows
> on, and don't need a big fancy X server or whatever
> ...
>
> What are some options I can add to the standard `make
> install` command for that port to significantly reduce
> the size of X ?
>

After it is installed you can remove all the .../work directories 
in the ports tree. Or just start by installing from packages.

X itself is not all that big -- but beware the fancy(=bloated) 
window-managers/desktops such as kde and gnome. If you want 
something better than twm while remaing compact then blackbox and 
fluxbox are often mentioned -- I use lesser known ctwm.

Malcolm


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: A few X questions (small X load for small drive needed)

2004-06-25 Thread Charles Swiger
On Jun 25, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Joe Schmoe wrote:
What are some options I can add to the standard `make
install` command for that port to significantly reduce
the size of X ?
Any general comments on making a smaller/faster/more
efficient X for an old laptop are greatly appreciated.
X11 doesn't really fit the criteria of small and efficient, I'm afraid. 
 This being said, you can try to install just x11/XFree86-4-libraries 
and the specific X11 client apps you want to run...

--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: A few X questions (small X load for small drive needed)

2004-06-25 Thread Alex de Kruijff
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 02:21:57PM -0700, Joe Schmoe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
> laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
> 
> It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
> all.
> 
> Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
> and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
> have a simple GUI to run opera and terminal windows
> on, and don't need a big fancy X server or whatever
> ...
> 
> What are some options I can add to the standard `make
> install` command for that port to significantly reduce
> the size of X ?
> 
> Any general comments on making a smaller/faster/more
> efficient X for an old laptop are greatly appreciated.

You are better off installing X with precompiled packages instead. You
then don't lose any space to the temp compile files.

-- 
Alex

Articles based on solutions that I use:
http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: A few X questions (small X load for small drive needed)

2004-06-25 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Joe Schmoe wrote:
Hi,
I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
all.
Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
have a simple GUI to run opera and terminal windows
on, and don't need a big fancy X server or whatever
...
What are some options I can add to the standard `make
install` command for that port to significantly reduce
the size of X ?
Did you do a
# make clean
in your /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4 directory after installation? 
This should reduce dik space significntly.

Regards,
Uli.
Any general comments on making a smaller/faster/more
efficient X for an old laptop are greatly appreciated.
thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


A few X questions (small X load for small drive needed)

2004-06-25 Thread Joe Schmoe
Hi,

I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.

It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
all.

Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
have a simple GUI to run opera and terminal windows
on, and don't need a big fancy X server or whatever
...

What are some options I can add to the standard `make
install` command for that port to significantly reduce
the size of X ?

Any general comments on making a smaller/faster/more
efficient X for an old laptop are greatly appreciated.

thanks.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"