Hi All,
I have a general question.
We have access to some new AMD64 based Dell Servers with 2 Core Duo
Xeons. We are currently using i386 Dell Servers with a core duo
processor. I recall from my MS Windows days that when there was the
shift from 16-bit to 32-bit processors it did take a
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:58:34AM -0400, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
Hi All,
I have a general question.
We have access to some new AMD64 based Dell Servers with 2 Core Duo
Xeons. We are currently using i386 Dell Servers with a core duo
processor. I recall from my MS Windows days
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:58:34AM -0400, Arend P. van der Veen wrote:
- Will the AMD64 based FreeBSD 6.2 distribution with applications such as
Postgresql, Apache, Python, Tomcat and SBCL be able to take advantage of
the 64-bit quad processor?
Yes, if you compile them natively on AMD64.
this is nothing professional, just my personal experience.
same machine, two sata, one is amd64, the other i386.
while doing portupgrade due to gtk upgrade on amd64, it reboot a few times,
never
finished the job, and i can't say why.
but on i386, portupgrade -fa due to no maintenance for a couple
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
this is nothing professional, just my personal experience.
same machine, two sata, one is amd64, the other i386.
while doing portupgrade due to gtk upgrade on amd64, it reboot a few times,
never
finished the job, and i can't say
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:57:31PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:32:45PM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
this is nothing professional, just my personal experience.
same machine, two sata, one is amd64, the other i386.
while doing portupgrade due to gtk upgrade on amd64,
We've been encountering some difficulty between
OpenLDAP/nss/pam/FreeBSD/samba over the past few months and really since
inception. After countless recompiles of samba, working with samba and
openldap code, we've traced it to being an issue somwhere between
freebsd and openldap using threads,
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been encountering some difficulty between
OpenLDAP/nss/pam/FreeBSD/samba over the past few months and really since
inception. After countless recompiles of samba, working with samba and
openldap code, we've traced it to being an issue
Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
clients sharing data via samba from UFS file systems... a drop-in
replacement
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
clients sharing data via
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64) based computer?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 19:46:48 -0500
Joseph Sniderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64)
based computer?
Yes!
Best of luck,
Andrew Gould
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Joseph Sniderman wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64) based computer?
Yes, but what what libs and programs you may install that are i386
based as opposed to 64-bit. You can seriously 'screw' up your system by
having several programs be unrunnable if
On Saturday 06 August 2005 21:37, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Joseph Sniderman wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64) based
computer?
Yes, but what what libs and programs you may install that are i386
based as opposed to 64-bit. You can seriously 'screw' up
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course.
Quoting David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
You can't run amd64 binaries when
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:29 AM
To: Kenneth Culver
Cc: Michal Pasternak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
David O'Brien
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
So far my athlon 64 3200+ has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:58, Remi wrote:
toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD
working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues?
Works fine here (Dell Inspiron 8600).
- - Modem doesn't work (no
Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they
say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to
be changed) So now I come to a cross
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they
say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to
be changed) So now I come to a cross
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
You can't change the cpu speed while running at the Moment, I don't
see any other iusses at the Moment with my Notebook (IBM T40).
I too have an IBM T40. It gives me much love, daily.
BMS
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:
It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
what the
laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after
already
booting an
: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 AM
To: Remi
Cc: 'Brooks Davis'; 'Michal Pasternak'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'David O'Brien'
Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:
It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
what the
laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no
changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64?
Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with
anything but x86
Yeah, no changes anywhere. I have my machine set
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT.
Which one would you
Quoting Michal Pasternak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]:
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
... but will it outperform it also
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running
processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop,
my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter...
Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power
PROTECTED]
Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one
would you guys recommend to run
Hello,
Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic
laptops.
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would
you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to
run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Remi wrote:
Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic
laptops.
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would
you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to
run,
David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]:
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
... but will it outperform it also by heat dissipation?
--
m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one
would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be
easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the
33 matches
Mail list logo
