In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 322, Issue 16, Message: 14
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 17:44:36 +0200 Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:33:30 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
> > This is it I guess. I chose bash shell and the default schell is the csh.
> >
> > There is a file called .logi
On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:10:01 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> Update:
>>
>> I modified the top line to contain :
>> ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure
>> and
>> at the very end added one with
>> ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty autologin" cons25 on
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:10:01 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Update:
>
> I modified the top line to contain :
> ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure
> and
> at the very end added one with
> ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty autologin" cons25 on secure
>
> and sadlyI get
>
> Aug 8 1
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:02:48 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Have changed it, now when I start machine I am logged in as root
>
> grullahighschool#
>
> I wonder what I did
So that's REALLY strange...
> /etc/gettytab
>
> ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty autologin" cons25 on secure
Change "aut
On 8/8/10, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 11:14:12 -0500, Antonio Olivares
>> wrote:
>>> It does not work. When I try to login I see:
>>>
>>> -bash: [ !: command not found
>>>
>>> I switch it to if statement suggested before for .login, but it
>>>
On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 11:14:12 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> It does not work. When I try to login I see:
>>
>> -bash: [ !: command not found
>>
>> I switch it to if statement suggested before for .login, but it
>> returns same error.
>
> Very strange; I've ch
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 11:14:12 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> It does not work. When I try to login I see:
>
> -bash: [ !: command not found
>
> I switch it to if statement suggested before for .login, but it
> returns same error.
Very strange; I've checked that in bash's dialog mode, and it
Polytropon,
> Yes. According to "man bash", section "INVOCATION", mentiones
> other file names: Bash reads and executes ~/.bash_profile,
> ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile (in that order), so you can
> add the line "[ ! -f /tmp/.X0-lock ] && startx" (short form
> is completely okay and valid) at the
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:33:30 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> This is it I guess. I chose bash shell and the default schell is the csh.
>
> There is a file called .login in my home directory
> /home/olivares/.login which has:
>
> $ $FreeBSD: src/share/skel/dot.login,v 1.17.2.1.5.1 2010/06/14
>
Polytropon,
On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:11:23 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> Polytropon,
>>
>> I have it almost working. The pam errors are not there anymore, but
>> the machine stays at the Password:
>>
>> prompt.
>
> That's strange. The user "praxis" in my worki
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:11:23 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Polytropon,
>
> I have it almost working. The pam errors are not there anymore, but
> the machine stays at the Password:
>
> prompt.
That's strange. The user "praxis" in my working example has a
password set, and the user will be as
On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 09:12:51 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> I apologize, but the change to put the code:
>>
>> [! -f /tmp/.X0-lock ] && startx
>
> Oh good, added the missing "!"in the condition. Maybe I should
> have written the code more clearly in the fir
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 09:12:51 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> I apologize, but the change to put the code:
>
> [! -f /tmp/.X0-lock ] && startx
Oh good, added the missing "!"in the condition. Maybe I should
have written the code more clearly in the first place:
if [ ! -f /tmp/.X0-l
On 8/8/10, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:33:58 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> Polytropon,
>>
>> So if I delete the file /etc/rc.local and make a file ~/.login, make
>> it executable (chmod +x ~/.login), and add the line
>>
>>
>>[ -f /tmp/.X0-lock ] && startx
>> in that fi
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:33:58 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Polytropon,
>
> So if I delete the file /etc/rc.local and make a file ~/.login, make
> it executable (chmod +x ~/.login), and add the line
>
>
>[ -f /tmp/.X0-lock ] && startx
> in that file and I will have the same result but
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Polytropon wrote:
> Just an addition: My solution works in the same way (modification
> of /etc/ttys and /etc/gettytab), but I avoid this step:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:49:00 -0500, Antonio Olivares
> wrote:
>> Then created file /etc/rc.local
>> with
>> su - user
Just an addition: My solution works in the same way (modification
of /etc/ttys and /etc/gettytab), but I avoid this step:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 04:49:00 -0500, Antonio Olivares
wrote:
> Then created file /etc/rc.local
> with
> su - user_to_be_logged_in -c startx
In fact, I use the autologin-user's
On 8/7/10, Elias Chrysocheris wrote:
> Dear Antonio,
>
> I thing you've messed things up a little bit. The distribution is for XFCE
> and
> of cource you have to use xdm instead of gdm. Installing gdm in your system
> also installs much of GNOME as you can see by running
>
> cd /usr/ports/x11/gdm
Dear Antonio,
I thing you've messed things up a little bit. The distribution is for XFCE and
of cource you have to use xdm instead of gdm. Installing gdm in your system
also installs much of GNOME as you can see by running
cd /usr/ports/x11/gdm
make all-depends-list
By looking carefully in thi
Rocky,
Thanks, been there and done that ::(
That shows how to use xdm, gut I am trying with xdm. And since the
spin is a custom one, I thought I was just getting XFCE only, but
there is enough of gnome that it will start instead of xfce.
I have messed around trying things, I fix one error and g
On 8/6/2010 10:15 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Thank you Manolis for your work. I installed it and have one
difficulty, that otherwise I would not bother you or other users here
on the list.
I loaded gdm to autologin xfce but I can autologin to gnome. How can
I do it to only load xfce.
T
On 8/2/10, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have just completed the first 8.1-RELEASE based build of the 'Custom
> releases' project hosted here:
>
> http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com
>
> At the moment only the 64bit version is available,
Hi Manolis,
Thank You . Please advise if a GNOME version of 8.1 release will be made
available or is there a different project that you are aware that makes this
available.
thanks.
Mubeesh
2010/8/2 Manolis Kiagias
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have ju
On 05/08/2010 5:02 ?.?., Mubeesh ali wrote:
> Hi Manolis,
>
> Thank You . Please advise if a GNOME version of 8.1 release will be
made available or is there a different project that you are aware that
makes this available.
>
>
> thanks.
> Mubeesh
>
>
GNOME is available on the official DVD. I h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey all,
I have just completed the first 8.1-RELEASE based build of the 'Custom
releases' project hosted here:
http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com
At the moment only the 64bit version is available, while a 32bit
version is in the works and is expected
25 matches
Mail list logo
