Eric Schuele wrote:
> Bob Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 8/12/05, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/080805-wafs.html
>>>
>>> It's software-in-a-box to tone down the chattiness of CIFS/SMB and NFS,
>>> so that WAN links aren't so slow.
>>>
>>> I'
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 8/12/05, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/080805-wafs.html
It's software-in-a-box to tone down the chattiness of CIFS/SMB and NFS,
so that WAN links aren't so slow.
I'm working with offices in the US, UK and AU, and file sh
luke wrote:
> you can also put all offices on a vpn and use regular smb or nfs or
> whatever transparently
>
That's what we do now - we have IPSec VPNs between all of our offices.
However, this does not mitigate problem with the number of hops, and the
latency added at each one. It's especially b
you can also put all offices on a vpn and use regular smb or nfs or
whatever transparently
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 8/12/05, Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/080805-wafs.html
>
> It's software-in-a-box to tone down the chattiness of CIFS/SMB and NFS,
> so that WAN links aren't so slow.
>
> I'm working with offices in the US, UK and AU, and file sharing b
Kurt Buff wrote:
All,
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/080805-wafs.html
It's software-in-a-box to tone down the chattiness of CIFS/SMB and NFS,
so that WAN links aren't so slow.
I'm working with offices in the US, UK and AU, and file sharing between
them is horrendous, mostly because of h
All,
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/080805-wafs.html
It's software-in-a-box to tone down the chattiness of CIFS/SMB and NFS,
so that WAN links aren't so slow.
I'm working with offices in the US, UK and AU, and file sharing between
them is horrendous, mostly because of how many hops betwee
