On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 04:36:23PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD
web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also
and in particular as a
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hi,
so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that
allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content)
and do the OS maintenance (OS package updates, firewall configuration)
On 09/05/2011 08:31 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hi,
so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that
allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content)
and do the OS maintenance (OS package
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:18:21 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
On 09/05/2011 08:31 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hi,
so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that
allows to configure services (I guess HTTP,
I just took a look at PBDir and the choice of PBIs for server-related
softwares seems to be rather limited. They have a PBI for Apache, but I
could not even find one for PHP... To me it seems that if not all the
required softwares are available through PBI, it would be better to drop
the whole
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:59:23 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I just took a look at PBDir and the choice of PBIs for server-related
softwares seems to be rather limited.
Okay, that's understandable, as servers are not their
main target. In fact, what do you need a GUI for on a
server? - This is
How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD
web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also
and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)? I noticed that in
the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring
more
If you really want. GUI based server, go for a Windows one. It will cost you
but security has improved. I would never do it though but I manage my server
with shell tools. I love the easiness of textbased config files ;)
___
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:20:22 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
How well does it work to use binary packages only to maintain a FreeBSD
web server in general (I am thinking of package availability, but also
and in particular as a quasi-automated updating tool)?
Quite well - as long as you're
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:50:19 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
I noticed that in
the past few years, updating softwares through ports has been requiring
more user intervention, due to the way some dependencies are being
updated from one version to the next. Would using binary packages
FreeBSD
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:03 -0400, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
Hi,
so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that
allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content)
and do
Hi,
so I have a friend who is looking for the best OS for a web server, that
allows to configure services (I guess HTTP, PHP, MySQL and web content)
and do the OS maintenance (OS package updates, firewall configuration)
without having to touch a shell. I was wondering if something like
12 matches
Mail list logo
