On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:10:49 +0100 (BST)
Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, a little typo on my part there. compat4x did
> solve my problem, BitDefender is up and running and
> working just great.
Good,
You could also use /etc/libmap.conf to solve libm.so.2 dependency. For
example, add
Sorry, a little typo on my part there. compat4x did
solve my problem, BitDefender is up and running and
working just great.
Thanks again,
smiity
--- Adi Pircalabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:43:04 +0100 (BST)
> Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Adi, that
Thanks Adi, that sorted my problem, BitDefender is not up and running :)
smiity
Adi Pircalabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:40:39 +0100 (BST)
Ian Smith wrote:
> # ldd /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so
> /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so:
> libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x281b3000)
> libs
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:40:39 +0100 (BST)
Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ldd /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so
> /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so:
>libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x281b3000)
>libstdc++.so.4 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x281d4000)
>libc.so.5 => /lib/
Adi,
Thanks for the response. The output from "ldd /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so" is as
follows:
# ldd /usr/local/bdc/libfn.so
/usr/local/bdc/libfn.so:
libc_r.so.5 => /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 (0x281b3000)
libstdc++.so.4 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.4 (0x281d4000)
libc.so.5 =
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:00:35 +0100 (BST)
Ian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a bit of trouble getting BitDefender working, I've tried
> installing it through the ports and by using the fetch command. Each
> time BitDefender installs without any hassle and will update fine
> when I ru
I'm having a bit of trouble getting BitDefender working, I've tried installing
it through the ports and by using the fetch command. Each time BitDefender
installs without any hassle and will update fine when I run "bdc --update" but
whenever I try "bdc --info" or "bdc --vlist" it does the follow
