CVSup/Ports Question

I just have a quick question on some of the documentation I have read about FreeBSD and it's ports collection. I read in the handbook that the cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be .. In particular, use only tag=. for the ports-* collections. However, when I was reading the ports(7)

Re: CVSup/Ports Question

At 11:09 PM 4/12/2006, you wrote: question on . ports collection. I read in the handbook that the cvsup tag for the ports-* collection should be .. In particular, use only tag=. for the ports-* collections. As I understand it, there is no most recent version of port that still works

cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

Hi folks, I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag tag=. I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag value to RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE or RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_2 in order to get the ports updating. I followed the instructions of the bsd

Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

On Friday 06 February 2004 10:32 am, jens wrote: Hi folks, I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag tag=. I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag value to RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE or RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_2 in order to get the ports

Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi folks, I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag tag=. I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag value to RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE or RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_2 Quoted from some of the example

Re: cvsup ports question Freebsd 5.2

On Friday 06 February 2004 21:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Ok thanks jens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi folks, I have build the ports tree using the default ports-sup file tag tag=. I want to understand why my ports tree is wiped off when i change the tag value to RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE