On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
notice if something
On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote:
I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I
checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them
all as masters.
Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people
doing this routinely it would
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones, depending
on what you choose to slave). I
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones,
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether people slave the root zone
or not, and why if not.
Active poster,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
Given their success
