>-Original Message-
>From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 7:58 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Scott Hiemstra; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
>Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
>
> > >
> > > >notice this thread is in reference to
> > swapping a MB for another MB and
> > > >coments like yours are not appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Please notice I never said what the box was
> > doing nor did I ask for your
> > > >opinion of what MB/NIC I use in my systems.
> > >
>
>
> > >
> > > >notice this thread is in reference to
> > swapping a MB for another MB and
> > > >coments like yours are not appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Please notice I never said what the box was
> > doing nor did I ask for your
> > > >opinion of what MB/NIC I use in my systems.
> > >
>
On Jun 4, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
The
seemingly tiny different between gigabit and
100Mb/s speeds could be the difference between
the window staying open or the process going to
sleep.
.
Or the fact that they are on 32bit/33mhz pci busses instead of faster
busses.
Chad
---
C
I would guess the gigabit switch vs my cheapo
100Mb/s switch would make that sort of
difference. You have to do the test with the same
hardware, same server, same switches otherwise
you have no relative comparision that's valid.
The server could make a huge difference also. Ftp
servers are kind of
On Jun 4, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Danial Thom wrote:
How is informing someone that they're wasting
their money on a MB a waste of time? I'm sure
you've wasted thousands of your employers dollars
with your ignorant recommendations, Jerry. I can
get hours of entertainment just googling you.
Ok, here's
--- Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > >notice this thread is in reference to
> swapping a MB for another MB and
> > >coments like yours are not appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >Please notice I never said what the box was
> doing nor did I ask for your
> > >opinion of what MB/NIC
>-Original Message-
>From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 3:42 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Scott Hiemstra; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
>Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
>
>>
&
Jerry, old buddy. what up? :)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
>
> >notice this thread is in reference to swapping a MB for another MB and
> >coments like yours are not appreciated.
> >
> >
> >Please notice I never said what the box was doing nor did I ask for your
> >opinion of what MB/NIC I use in my systems.
>
> Makes no difference, he has as much right t
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Hiemstra
>Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 9:20 AM
>To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
>Subject: RE: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
>notice this thread is
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Hiemstra
>Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:14 AM
>To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
>Subject: RE: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
>
>> I run FreeB
--- Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Danial Thom
> > Sent: vrijdag 2 juni 2006 18:28
> > To: Scott Hiemstra; 'FreeBSD-Questions
> Qu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danial Thom
> Sent: vrijdag 2 juni 2006 18:28
> To: Scott Hiemstra; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
> Subject: RE: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
> --
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hiemstra
>
> Sent: vrijdag 2 juni 2006 17:13
> To: 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'
> Subject: RE: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R?
>
> > I run Fr
--- Scott Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Did you say you are running a server? That MB
> is
> > only suitable for desktop use, as it has the
> > slowest ethernet controller known to man on a
> > 32/33Mhz bus. Running this MB as a server is
> like
> > putting cheap, skinny tires on your p
> Did you say you are running a server? That MB is
> only suitable for desktop use, as it has the
> slowest ethernet controller known to man on a
> 32/33Mhz bus. Running this MB as a server is like
> putting cheap, skinny tires on your porsche.
>
> DT
Personaly, I appreciate your dedication to m
--- Scott Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I run FreeBSD 4.11 stable, and I need to
> replace my ASUS K8V Deluxe
> > motherboard. I am thinking about de K8V-X SE.
> However,
> > instead of the 8237
> > chipset, it has the 8237R. Is that supported
> in FreeBSD 4.11 stable as
> > well? Als
> I run FreeBSD 4.11 stable, and I need to replace my ASUS K8V Deluxe
> motherboard. I am thinking about de K8V-X SE. However,
> instead of the 8237
> chipset, it has the 8237R. Is that supported in FreeBSD 4.11 stable as
> well? Also, instead of the Gigabyte LAN, it has a Realtek
> 8201CL D vers
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:49:22PM +, Mark wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I run FreeBSD 4.11 stable, and I need to replace my ASUS K8V Deluxe
> motherboard. I am thinking about de K8V-X SE. However, instead of the 8237
> chipset, it has the 8237R. Is that supported in FreeBSD 4.11 stable as
> well?
A
Hello,
I run FreeBSD 4.11 stable, and I need to replace my ASUS K8V Deluxe
motherboard. I am thinking about de K8V-X SE. However, instead of the 8237
chipset, it has the 8237R. Is that supported in FreeBSD 4.11 stable as
well? Also, instead of the Gigabyte LAN, it has a Realtek 8201CL D version
L
21 matches
Mail list logo
