Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Ian Moore writes: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:50, Matt Rechkemmer wrote: > > Final question :-), is there anyway to determine if a base package is out > > of date? Or is just wise to leave the base alone and upgrade when a new > > release comes along. > > You should at least update your system when

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-11 Thread Ian Moore
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:50, Matt Rechkemmer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > These are probably RTFM questions, but I didn't seem to find a mention of > the base system packages in the UPGRADING document. So how would one > update a base package, check it o

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-10 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Um, no, as the original poster pointed out, ssh is part of the base > system, and normally you don't need the port. > > Upgrading the base system *is* the best approach. It *doesn't* > normally require updating to the latest r

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How would I upgrade just one package part of the core like that? Or multiple > > ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have > > to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11). > > I'd say, given that ssh is par

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread Lowell Gilbert
-- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mai

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread Olivier Nicole
> How would I upgrade just one package part of the core like that? Or multiple > ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have > to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11). I'd say, given that ssh is part of the ports (/usr/ports/security/ssh), you could us

Re: Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread gabriel
a patch would be issued for the source. On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:57:48 -0700, Matt Rechkemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is somewhat of a dumb question, but I'm a bit confused about the > differences between ports, packages and what is currently on the system. > Let's [hypothetically] say I h

Dumb question about ports/packages

2005-02-08 Thread Matt Rechkemmer
This is somewhat of a dumb question, but I'm a bit confused about the differences between ports, packages and what is currently on the system. Let's [hypothetically] say I have a FreeBSD 5.3 system. I use the ports system on things I want to compile and packages when I'm lazy :-). I keep track of