Hiya,
Since freebsd-ipfw is dead and mostly for spammers, let me try my luck
here once more ;)
I am trying to prove a point to a customer - that he can save the cost
of expensive routing hardware by just having a FreeBSD box on their LAN.
Unfortunately, this also means that I need to spend days
In response to Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
The scenario:
I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
interfaces at the moment, external interface connected to the hostile
Internet and internal interface connected to a switch for the LAN.
The
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I need to control bandwidth on the external interface only, not on the
LAN (internal interfaces).
Is this rightful thinking or sheer imagination which is not practical?
If you're happy with IPFilter and need to ensure minimum bandwidth for
some network segment,
* On 20/09/06 11:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| [snip]
|
| The scenario:
|
| I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
| interfaces at the moment, external interface connected to the hostile
| Internet and
* On 20/09/06 17:16 +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
| Odhiambo Washington wrote:
|
| I need to control bandwidth on the external interface only, not on the
| LAN (internal interfaces).
|
| Is this rightful thinking or sheer imagination which is not practical?
|
| If you're happy with IPFilter and
In response to Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* On 20/09/06 11:16 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
| In response to Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| [snip]
|
| The scenario:
|
| I am running a FreeBSD 5.x box with IPFilter/IPNAT. The box has two
| interfaces at the
