Am 29.03.2013 16:19, schrieb David Thurber:
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
RHEL:
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/press-archive/2012/1/red-hat-enterprise-linux-stability-d
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:19:02 -0600
David Thurber wrote:
> I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7.
> So, I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace
> XP/3.
>
if you do not count the service packs and updates, your XP installa
On 29/03/2013 15:19, David Thurber wrote:
> I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
> I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
>
> What I got from your website appears to be a year or two at most on
> freebsd 8.3,
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:19:02 -0600, David Thurber wrote:
> I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
> I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
It's good you're paying attention to the upcoming death
of "Wi
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
What I got from your website appears to be a year or two at most on
freebsd 8.3, and we really don't want to repeat the travails of the
trans
this correct?
>
> Branch Release Type Release Date Estimated EoL
> RELENG_6_1 6.1-RELEASE Normal May 9, 2006 May 31, 2008
Once the web site rebuilds, it will be correctly listed as an Extended release.
Colin Percival
___
Release DateEstimated EoL
RELENG_6_1 6.1-RELEASE Normal May 9, 2006 May 31, 2008
Please advise,
Thank you for your help.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
ate
our path to 6.x adoption. Actually, it'll be nice to wave the EOL
stick to force some action on that. Running EOL server parts is
against policy. =)
--
Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator
South Central Library System (SCLS)
Library Interchange Networ
>>http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31
> >>2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ?
> >
> >Yes.
>
> [blink blink]
>
> I'm not at all opposed to RE@ and security@ making hard decisions
> and do
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:20:21AM +0200, albi wrote:
i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when
security-updates will be available
http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31
2006, but does that also mean no more security-up
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:20:21AM +0200, albi wrote:
>
> i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when
> security-updates will be available
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31
> 2006, but does that also mean no more s
i'm running 5.4 on a few servers, and i wondered till when
security-updates will be available
http://www.freebsd.org/security/ says that the EOL is estimated may 31
2006, but does that also mean no more security-updates for 5.4 ?
i have no problem with doing a reinstall with the brand ne
"duncan brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been using Linux for about 11 years now, and I'm starting to get
> interested in your distro.
>
> The thing is, I can't find anywhere on your site the EOL plan for your
> releases.
Hello,
I've been using Linux for about 11 years now, and I'm starting to get
interested in your distro.
The thing is, I can't find anywhere on your site the EOL plan for your
releases. I run my own server on Fedora Core, but the EOL schedule is
too agressive for me to keep t
14 matches
Mail list logo
