On 18 February 2010 11:24, Christian Baer christian.b...@uni-dortmund.dewrote:
krad schrieb:
On another point make sure your p4 has plenty of ram preferably 4gb, but
at
least 2
Exactly what good will that much RAM do for a 32Bit-CPU?
Regards,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/02/2010 00:28, Ghirai wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:21:48 -0500
mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote:
UFS on the other hand will work just fine on 32bit systems and
smaller and older machines. (The limitation with UFS is a maximum
2TB
krad schrieb:
On another point make sure your p4 has plenty of ram preferably 4gb, but at
least 2
Exactly what good will that much RAM do for a 32Bit-CPU?
Regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/02/2010 00:11, mailinglist wrote:
I've got an old P4 desktop computer running in the basement with a 1
TB external USB drive connected to that I use as a file server. That
PC is running XP. It has recently become infected with some sort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does your old P4 support 64-bit operation? Does it have 2GB RAM or more? If
not, then you might want to reconsider using ZFS. It's not that it won't or
can't be made to work given those limitations, but you'll find it hard work to
get it
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:21:48 -0500
mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote:
UFS on the other hand will work just fine on 32bit systems and
smaller and older machines. (The limitation with UFS is a maximum
2TB filesystem size, but I suspect this will not cause you any
practical
I've got an old P4 desktop computer running in the basement with a 1 TB
external USB drive connected to that I use as a file server. That PC is
running XP. It has recently become infected with some sort of virus. I'd like
to replace it with FreeBSD running ZFS + Samba (I need to access
On 18 February 2010 00:11, mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote:
I've got an old P4 desktop computer running in the basement with a 1 TB
external USB drive connected to that I use as a file server. That PC is
running XP. It has recently become infected with some sort of virus. I'd
like
Hi Roland,
many thanks for the response!!! :-)
I waited until I had a test server setup and at least now I do..
In fact I think from my usage perspective FreeBSD is not that difficult
to understand!!!
I now have a test machine setup which I built nano and Bind 9.6.1 from
the ports
Just to give a quick overview of what is being used currently:
test# du -sch etc
1.7Metc
1.7Mtotal
test# du -sch var
1.0Mvar
1.0Mtotal
test# du -sch tmp
10Ktmp
10Ktotal
test# du -sch usr
1.0Gusr
1.0Gtotal
I think I could get away with 500MB for /var and /tmp and
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 11:41:04PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi Roland,
many thanks for the response!!! :-)
You're welcome!
I waited until I had a test server setup and at least now I do..
In fact I think from my usage perspective FreeBSD is not that difficult
to understand!!!
If
.
I am looking to setup a small file server which I will use as DNS and
NTP server also. The reason for selecting FreeBSD is that the system I
about to install onto doesn't have much memory (not sure how much but
probably in the region of 300-500MB perhaps) and although Linux would
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 04:20:10PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@optiplex-networks.com
Running with no xorg.conf is fine, but you need to make sure dbus and hal
are started at boot. Follow the handbook for best results.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
Also if something goes wrong with the filesystem what are the tools to
check the drive and repair errors as in Linux I use e2fsck followed by
device ID.
Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
Also if something goes wrong with the filesystem what are the tools to
check the drive and repair errors as in Linux I use
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:19:54PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
Many thanks guys for all the advice :-)
It is really appreciated!
Sorry haven't snipped more stuff into this mail but things are a bit
hectic here but what I will say is this; in a few hours once the BSD 8
DVD ISO comes
[...]
What is not unusual is to symlink /home e.g:
# ln -s /usr/home /home
ditto for /tmp. i.e you remove all the stuff that uses up space from
the root partition.
So the only slices you need are /, /usr, /var and swap.
How I'd slice up the disk:
2GB for /
2GB for swap
2GB for /var
34GB
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Kaya Saman wrote:
How I'd slice up the disk:
2GB for /
2GB for swap
2GB for /var
34GB for /usr
Ah so BSD is slightly different from Linux in the fact that it needs to have
/var and /usr filesystems separate??
It's not required, it's just nice to do if the disk space
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
[...]
What is not unusual is to symlink /home e.g:
# ln -s /usr/home /home
ditto for /tmp. i.e you remove all the stuff that uses up space from
the root partition.
So the only slices you need are /, /usr, /var and swap.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:19:54PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
Many thanks guys for all the advice :-)
It is really appreciated!
...
I reckon the proposed disk usage spec from the FreeBSD hand book should
suffice
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
[...]
What is not unusual is to symlink /home e.g:
# ln -s /usr/home /home
ditto for /tmp. i.e you remove all the stuff that uses up space from
the root partition.
So the only slices you need are /, /usr, /var and
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:37:25PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
[...]
What is not unusual is to symlink /home e.g:
# ln -s /usr/home /home
ditto for /tmp. i.e you remove all the stuff that uses up space from
the root partition.
So the only slices you need are /, /usr, /var and swap.
Many thanks again for all suggestions! :-)
[...]
For my desktop, with around 450 ports installed, I have the following lay-out;
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad4s1a484M 93M353M21%/
/dev/ad4s1g.eli373G168G175G49%
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:25:48PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:27:11PM +, Frank Shute wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:19:54PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
Many thanks guys for all the advice :-)
It is really appreciated!
...
I reckon
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 09:06:09PM +0200, Kaya Saman wrote:
lot's of different pieces of advice rolling in now!
I guess what I will do as I have a small hard disk for what I want to do
which is to get rid of my music and few movies which are stored on my
laptop currently, is create
Roland:
If you can afford it, and if your laptop has a USB port, buy one of those
external harddisks. Plenty of room for music and movies... Also great for
backups!
Can't afford :-( I have many disks like that where I bought really cool
enclosures and the drives separately but currently
idea of what maybe so when the time comes
I can investigate further!
The second and main question that I wish to ask is more to do with
peoples opinions or experienced BSD users advice:
I am looking to setup a small file server which I will use as DNS and
NTP server also. The reason
://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-config.html
The second and main question that I wish to ask is more to do with peoples
opinions or experienced BSD users advice:
I am looking to setup a small file server which I will use as DNS and NTP
server also. The reason for selecting FreeBSD
Running with no xorg.conf is fine, but you need to make sure dbus and
hal are started at boot. Follow the handbook for best results.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-config.html
I'm sure I started them as this doc is exactly what I followed.. I
think if I recall
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
I know how strong UFS v.1 is as I use it with Solaris 9, but how about UFS
v.2 which is what FreeBSD runs?? When compared with ext3 from a
performance/reliability perspective which one comes on top?
I would say ufs2
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 14:42, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
Running with no xorg.conf is fine, but you need to make sure dbus and hal
are started at boot. Follow the handbook for best results.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/x-config.html
I'm sure I started them
I would say ufs2 easily wins, but remember this is the
freebsd-questions list ;) There are some differences though, ufs2
uses softupdates, not journaling(journaling is available and easy to
implement via gjournal). Softupdates I believe are a little faster
than journaling, but it's
of it - just give me a couple of days to get the file server I am
on about up and running then will transfer the stuff clogging my
notebooks HD over there and install a VM through Vbox and really have a
go at understanding the GUI.
I did play around with FreeBSIE which is FreeBSD with the GUI
of what maybe so when the time comes
I can investigate further!
The second and main question that I wish to ask is more to do with
peoples opinions or experienced BSD users advice:
I am looking to setup a small file server which I will use as DNS and
NTP server also. The reason for selecting
to doing things from scratch but soon I will get the hang
of it - just give me a couple of days to get the file server I am on about
up and running then will transfer the stuff clogging my notebooks HD over
there and install a VM through Vbox and really have a go at understanding
the GUI.
I'm
The most common cause is that either hald (sysutils/hal) or dbus (devel/dbus)
isn't running. Xorg needs them both to detect mouse and keyboard. Add
dbus_enable=YES and hald_enable=YES to rc.conf to get them to start
automatically.
We'll see what the issue actually is - as I mentioned I
Kurt Buff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 15:29, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
I see I didn't completely read your original message. Indulge me a
moment while I ramble here, and probably expose my ignorance...
Xorg/X11 Gnome
Gnome runs on Xorg: Xorg/Xfree runs X11
Xfree
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Kaya Saman kayasa...@optiplex-networks.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I attempted an install of 7.2 stable on my laptop and subsequently
installed X11also. Now I didn't have any Xorg.conf file but each time I
tried to start X from the CLI using
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 16:23, Kaya Saman samank...@netscape.net wrote:
snip
So, given what you've written below, you probably know more about this
stuff than I do. Cool. I will echo the advice already given, however:
add
dbus_enable=YES
hald_enable=YES
to your /etc/rc.conf. That will most
[...]
add
dbus_enable=YES
hald_enable=YES
to your /etc/rc.conf. That will most likely clear your problem.
[...]
I will give this a go soon :-)
That's what I do with mine under FreeBSD, for both servers and workstations.
Having both servers and workstations is cool as both of
Hi Guys,
I just wanted to mention that George's changes should be incorporated
into the official FreeNAS build of 0.7 (it's RC1 right now) when it
comes out, so using our custom image should only be a temporary thing
should you choose to go the A2000 route.
Regards,
David Davis
Software
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about once per quarter and brought offsite.
What kind of
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup? Would
a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
Or should I just buy a barebones headless desktop PC (Dell has them
cheap now for $241)
On 7/19/09, Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup?
Would a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
Or should I just buy a
Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about once per quarter and
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
I would like to setup a home fileserver running FreeNAS (which itself runs
on FreeBSD 7.2). Can someone recommend hardware for this?
I know I'd have to get 3 harddrives. Two will be at home running RAID1, and
the third will be mirrored about
Tim Judd writes:
On 7/19/09, Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav
alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
What kind of RAID chassis, computer system should I get for this setup?
Would a soekris be sufficient, or is that overkill?
I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous board
was an ASUS P3 1.1GHz, which now hosts my backup server. Both ran
the onboard SATA sockets so I could increase our available disk space
(4x500GB in RAID5 for data).
However, a nice benefit is that the Core2 will compile world in 1/4
the time, and user don't notice the server is 'busy'.
Core2 is actually only a bit faster per clock cycle than PIII, but you
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, DA Forsyth d.fors...@ru.ac.za wrote:
I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:06 AM, DA Forsyth d.fors...@ru.ac.za wrote:
I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
Nice, esp when you compile world. Last year I upgraded our server
to a Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, Intel DG965 board. 2GB RAM. Previous
On 8 Jun 2009 , freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org entreated about
freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 262, Issue 2:
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:18:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
SO, to the original question, yes that motherboard will work just
If you want to use gmirror + gjournal on the root filesystem (/), be
sure to use FreeBSD 7.2. A bug prevented the system to boot on unclean
shutdown because the replay of the journal took too much time and
FreeBSD wanted to mount non-existant (yet) devices. It caused me a lot
of trouble when I
2009/6/6 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of
that
even when under load.
In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw
Hello community,
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using samba.
What i mainly try
Valentin Bud wrote:
Hello community,
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using samba
as a File Server
and Print Server using samba.
What i mainly try to achieve, talking in storage space, is 2 HDD of
1TB in mirroring using gmirror(8) and 1 separate HDD of 500Gb.
So do you think the system I've mentioned would handle the load? The
server will be used by 4 people for storage
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
this is not old - very powerfull machine.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using samba
2009/6/5 Valentin Bud valentin@gmail.com:
Hello community,
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server
power than needed. disks speed is the only limit
I have a P-II at 400 MHz running as a file server. See about 5 MB/sec on
most file transfers. Has one of the original 15GB IBM Deskstar drives,
and a much slower 6 GB WD drive. Both on ATA16 interfaces.
I suspect network speed will determine the limits
10 times more power than needed. disks speed is the only limit
I have a P-II at 400 MHz running as a file server. See about 5 MB/sec on
it depends from both sides ability, but pentium 100 with SDRAM memory can
saturate 100Mbit/s network running FreeBSD 6.2
Valentin Bud wrote:
Hello community,
I have an old computer (ASRock P4Dual-915GL) with Intel P4
CPU at 3.0Ghz and 2Gb of RAM.
I am asking the list maybe is somebody out there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using
This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you performance
on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't touch.
is really pentium 4 downlevel hardware? sound like a joke to me.
i made all-need server for small office (8 people) using PIII/500 and 384
MB RAM. i
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you
performance
on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't touch.
is really pentium 4 downlevel hardware? sound like a joke to me.
Not really. But considering how everyone is buying Core
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
This is one place where FreeBSD is very good. It will give you
performance on slightly downlevel hardware that Windows Server just can't
touch.
is really pentium 4 downlevel hardware? sound like a joke to me.
Sorry - it wasn't really intended that way. Please note
Sorry - it wasn't really intended that way. Please note that slightly
downlevel... was meant to refer to a combination of older Netburst
architecture and consumer retail motherboard.
The Core Xeons that replaced the old Netburst processors are much better
performers. In a true datacenter server
is really pentium 4 downlevel hardware? sound like a joke to me.
Not really. But considering how everyone is buying Core Duos and quads
these days, you can get decent P4s for free.
could you please tell me where i can get P4 machine for free? :)
there with a similar
configuration
and running FreeBSD on such a system as a File Server and Print Server
using samba.
What i mainly try to achieve, talking in storage space, is 2 HDD of 1TB in
mirroring using gmirror(8) and 1 separate HDD of 500Gb.
So do you think the system I've mentioned
2009/6/5 Gabriel Lavoie glav...@gmail.com:
I think my file/print/mail server is a bit overkill:
http://w3.mutehq.net:8008/sysinfo/
What a waste... How much power does that chug??
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W of power when idle with EIST enabled. This power draw
on Intel 45nm CPUs
On 6/5/09, Gabriel Lavoie glav...@gmail.com wrote:
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W of power when
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W of power when idle with EIST enabled. This power draw
unless CPU are
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 12:43:23AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Much less than a Pentium 4! Exactly I don't know. This server is a
normal PC with a 380W PSU (still too much for the hardware). The funny
thing is that the CPU in it (Pentium Dual Core E5200 45nm) is supposed
to draw under 4W
Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that
even when under load.
In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw less than
100W for the whole system. It is not even
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 01:31:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if
the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that
even when under load.
In fact a typical modern desktop computer will,
Hi
we plan a FreeBSD server which can host
at least 20 Terabyte of data.
The system will be shipped with FreeBSD 7 or 8 and will be based
on a NexSAN SAS Beast.
We would like to know if anybody has tried FreeBSD with NexSAN products
and particularly if he has a suggestion about a solid HBA.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm planning to build a new home file server for myself, starting with
about 2TB of RAID6 space, but with room to grow in the future. Most of
that will be on SATA drives, but I may throw in two SAS drives
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
Greetings,
I'm planning to build a new home file server for myself, starting with
about 2TB of RAID6 space, but with room to grow in the future. Most of
that will be on SATA drives, but I may throw in two SAS drives in
RAID1 for the base OS, hence the SAS raid
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@verizon.net wrote:
I'm not really answering the direct question, per se, but there is a data
point you may wish to know a little more about. There exists a difference in
hard drives, ala Enterprise vs Desktop. The difference is in the
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@verizon.net
wrote:
I'm not really answering the direct question, per se, but there is a data
point you may wish to know a little more about. There exists a
Greetings,
I'm planning to build a new home file server for myself, starting with
about 2TB of RAID6 space, but with room to grow in the future. Most of
that will be on SATA drives, but I may throw in two SAS drives in
RAID1 for the base OS, hence the SAS raid controller and enclosure
@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unstable File Server
At 10:59 AM 6/25/2008, Marcel Grandemange wrote:
The raid card is an Adaptec 2420sa, however devices on that controller
never
have shown troubles.
To give a breakdown:
Mount points:
/dev/ad0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ad0s1f
, 2008 4:44 PM
To: 'Derek Ragona'; 'Marcel Grandemange'
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unstable File Server
I have had those exact problems with my removable tray.
Try eliminating the tray for a while and see...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Good day!
I hope someone might be able to assist me over here!
I have a multipurpose FreeBSD server, and one of the roles is being a file
server.
This role however seems to continuously bring the machine to it's knees.
I have tried seeking help elsewhere namely
http
Good day!
I hope someone might be able to assist me over here!
I have a multipurpose FreeBSD server, and one of the roles is being a file
server.
This role however seems to continuously bring the machine to it's knees.
I have tried seeking help elsewhere namely
http
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
Good day!
I hope someone might be able to assist me over here!
I have a multipurpose FreeBSD server, and one of the roles is being a file
server.
This role however seems to continuously bring the machine to it's knees.
I have tried seeking help elsewhere
Daneliuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:19 PM
To: Marcel Grandemange
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unstable File Server
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
Good day!
I hope someone might be able to assist me over here!
I have a multipurpose FreeBSD server
4:19 PM
To: Marcel Grandemange
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Unstable File Server
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
Good day!
I hope someone might be able to assist me over here!
I have a multipurpose FreeBSD server, and one of the roles is being a file
server.
This role however
Grandemange; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unstable File Server
At 09:37 AM 6/25/2008, Marcel Grandemange wrote:
If you see in forum I had replaced all cables with brand new ones, upgraded
the PSU three times, and even tried multiple PCI controllers. The only
replace the RAID card since you already
tried new cables.
-Derek
From: Derek Ragona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:08 PM
To: Marcel Grandemange; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unstable File Server
At 09:37 AM 6/25/2008
To: Marcel Grandemange
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Unstable File Server
At 10:59 AM 6/25/2008, Marcel Grandemange wrote:
The raid card is an Adaptec 2420sa, however devices on that controller never
have shown troubles.
To give a breakdown:
Mount points:
/dev
I found it.
I'll try it out, and see what we get.
Interesting thing is, that i went again to verify the finds that i
wrote in my letter, and it is not the ping itself that increases
performance, but the fact of multiple connections - while pinging from
console (ping -f), the behaviour
server, he was getting
the varying speed of 5-13 MBps, from his machine to file server -
which is unacceptably low for any kind of transfer speed.
Interestingly enough, when he tried to copy _TWO_ files to file
server, the transfer speed vould jump to the 25-27 MB/sec and keep
permanent
to upload the single file to file server, he was getting
the varying speed of 5-13 MBps, from his machine to file server -
which is unacceptably low for any kind of transfer speed.
Interestingly enough, when he tried to copy _TWO_ files to file
server, the transfer speed vould jump to the 25-27 MB/sec
of the wedding videos.
When trying to upload the single file to file server, he was getting
the varying speed of 5-13 MBps, from his machine to file server -
which is unacceptably low for any kind of transfer speed.
Interestingly enough, when he tried to copy _TWO_ files to file
server
server, he was getting
the varying speed of 5-13 MBps, from his machine to file server -
which is unacceptably low for any kind of transfer speed.
Interestingly enough, when he tried to copy _TWO_ files to file
server, the transfer speed vould jump to the 25-27 MB/sec and keep
permanent
server, he was getting
the varying speed of 5-13 MBps, from his machine to file server -
which is unacceptably low for any kind of transfer speed.
Interestingly enough, when he tried to copy _TWO_ files to file
server, the transfer speed vould jump to the 25-27 MB/sec and keep
permanent
address from the fileserver, i get performance increase in the transfer speed
- the bigger the traffic i generate, the better the results, which max out at
25-27 MB/sec with flood ping.
Has anyone else experienced any similar behaviour?
yes. there was (but at 100Mbit/s) autonegotiation
Hello,
I have Freebsd 6.2 installed with file quota on. Today I have installed
samba and enbaled network share for Windows machines. Now I would like to
set quota for this share. I am not sure if I should do this from the swat
panel or set the quota via command line in freebsd?
All hints gladly
man tuning?
Cheers,
Lars.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Carey
Posted At: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:28 PM
Posted To: FreeBSD-Questions
Conversation: Kernel Options fo a File Server
Subject: Kernel Options fo a File Server
Hello
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
