Re: Follow-up: Yet Another make release fails on ghostscript-gnu

2002-11-06 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Michael Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Having complete control over the build of my network OS is simply > revolutionary... but I was hoping this revolution would not be so > bloody. You can get *that* with one of the supported update options. "make release" was never intended for anybody

Follow-up: Yet Another make release fails on ghostscript-gnu

2002-11-05 Thread Michael Dexter
Greetings again, Regarding the make release mentioned earlier... After peppering my /usr/ports/distfiles/ tree with very redundant distfiles, i.e. the same files in /usr/ports and /usr/ports/ghostscript and /usr/ports/ghostscript-gnu, things finally worked. (Ending on a vn present failure but