Re: Fragments of kernel log text in security run message

2003-08-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:50:19AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:

  I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why.  Often it causes
  syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
  with the truncated message).
 
 I think this happens after the kernel's message buffer starts rolling
 over.  The very first line in the dmesg output sometimes gets cut in
 half, so diff prints it as a change block, and the security script
 prints the add portion.  Maybe the check_diff function should remove
 the first line of the dmesg output before doing the diff?

I guess I'm talking about a different problem, actually (syslogd),
although I see the truncated security script mail as well.

Kris


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Fragments of kernel log text in security run message

2003-08-18 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-08-17 23:01:54 -0700:
 On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:50:19AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
 
   I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why.  Often it causes
   syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
   with the truncated message).
  
  I think this happens after the kernel's message buffer starts rolling
  over.  The very first line in the dmesg output sometimes gets cut in
  half, so diff prints it as a change block, and the security script
  prints the add portion.  Maybe the check_diff function should remove
  the first line of the dmesg output before doing the diff?
 
 I guess I'm talking about a different problem, actually (syslogd),
 although I see the truncated security script mail as well.

The oldest security run mail I found this artifact in is dated
Fri,  6 Sep 2002 03:01:14 + (GMT):

ishtar.bellavista.cz kernel log messages:
 tfix/local[3952]: fatal: open database /etc/aliases.db: No such file or directory

Next day's security run shows I updated the box to 4.7-PRERELEASE on
Sep 7, but I don't know what version it was running till then.

Hope this is of *some* help.

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fragments of kernel log text in security run message

2003-08-17 Thread Ralph Dratman
Until recently, my security run messages from Release-4.7 have been 
reasonably comprehensible. Certain events and changes have been 
reported, such as login failures and setuid changes, but I could 
always figure out roughly what was being reported.

Recently, though, I've been seeing small fragments of text in the 
kernel log portion of that report. This happens almost every day 
now. Following are a few examples. There is just one fragment per 
report.
-
kq9.net kernel log messages:
copeid 0x4
kq9.net kernel log messages:
8.
kq9.net kernel log messages:
nal_number pid ...
kq9.net kernel log messages:
rved.
kq9.net kernel log messages:
0/16/63] at ata0-slave WDMA2
kq9.net kernel log messages:
d to support NFS
kq9.net kernel log messages:
/ad0s1a:
kq9.net kernel log messages:
, 4950 blocks, 2.0% fragmentation)
kq9.net kernel log messages:
TEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS
-

Each of these messages looks like a valid fragment of a bootup 
message, but I don't see why I should suddenly be getting these in 
the security report.

Does anyone know where this stuff might be coming from?

Thank you very much.

Ralph
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Fragments of kernel log text in security run message

2003-08-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:39:49PM -0400, Ralph Dratman wrote:

 Recently, though, I've been seeing small fragments of text in the 
 kernel log portion of that report. This happens almost every day 
 now. Following are a few examples. There is just one fragment per 
 report.
 -
 kq9.net kernel log messages:
 copeid 0x4
 
 kq9.net kernel log messages:
 8.

I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why.  Often it causes
syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
with the truncated message).

Kris


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Fragments of kernel log text in security run message

2003-08-17 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 17), Kris Kennaway said:
 On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:39:49PM -0400, Ralph Dratman wrote:
 
  Recently, though, I've been seeing small fragments of text in the 
  kernel log portion of that report. This happens almost every day 
  now. Following are a few examples. There is just one fragment per 
  report.
  -
  kq9.net kernel log messages:
  copeid 0x4
  
  kq9.net kernel log messages:
  8.
 
 I get this as well on RELENG_4...I wish I knew why.  Often it causes
 syslogd to log it at LOG_EMERG priority (=spams every logged in user
 with the truncated message).

I think this happens after the kernel's message buffer starts rolling
over.  The very first line in the dmesg output sometimes gets cut in
half, so diff prints it as a change block, and the security script
prints the add portion.  Maybe the check_diff function should remove
the first line of the dmesg output before doing the diff?

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]