On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:10 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
Okay. Maybe we'll see a convergence of the two in the medium/long
term. Right now, interested parties need to look at the available
hardware, and then talk to the vendors about whether they would be
willing to support a
On 18.08.2010 18:20, C. Bergström wrote:
Hi Oliver,
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do
not know were to start.
Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it
and taking small steps in the right direction.
First, and this hasn't
Svein Skogen (Listmail account) wrote:
On 18.08.2010 18:20, C. Bergström wrote:
Hi Oliver,
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do
not know were to start.
Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it
and taking small steps
On 21.08.2010 11:01, C. Bergström wrote:
*snip*
(Hope I don't come across negative... I'm just trying to give real
feedback based on our experience)
No coming-across-as-negative interpreted. ;)
As I said, my two 5970s sit in a windows box...
//Svein
--
Sorry for the dalay:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:26:16 +0700
C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote:
No, PathScale has a full NVIDIA replacement. From front-end
programming model to kernel driver. (I'm happy to give more
information, but don't want to spam the list)
Oks,
FreeBSD has
...
MPI is typically dependent on the network not OpenMP. OpenMP 3.0 can
be made more scalable if there's tasks built-into the kernel that can
be cleanly exposed to userland. (Like OpenSolaris + libtask from
Moinak is a good example)
If you have a specific set of modifications in mind,
Hi b. f.
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:16 +
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
MPI is typically dependent on the network not OpenMP. OpenMP 3.0
can be made more scalable if there's tasks built-into the kernel
http://www.bsdcan.org/2010/schedule/events/169.en.html
, and
On 8/20/10, Eduardo emor...@xroff.net wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:24:16 +
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
Reading documentation, thanks b. f. I'm already on freebsd-hackers
list. Is that the correct list for this topic?
If you have a specific technical question about FreeBSD
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
Hi Oliver,
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do not
know were to start.
Yeah it's a pretty big problem, but I can say others are looking at it and
taking small steps in the right direction.
First, and this
hasn't changed since the last 15 years, FreeBSD lack in
Hi Christopher,
C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com escribió:
PathScale and CAPS recently announced HMPP as a new manycore GPGPU
open standard and there's a chance you'll see it ported to FBSD. In
addition to this you could see other open standards working well on
FBSD, but that
emor...@xroff.net wrote:
Hi Christopher,
C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com escribió:
PathScale and CAPS recently announced HMPP as a new manycore GPGPU
open standard and there's a chance you'll see it ported to FBSD. In
addition to this you could see other open standards working well on
Pieter de Goeje pie...@degoeje.nl escribió:
The amd64 driver was an illustration of something where raising awareness or
whatever you might call it actually helped IMHO.
Unfortunately this is a chicken-and-egg problem. No HPC users means no demand
means no incentive to do something about it
There are some other problems (please note that i don't follow the
-current nor -kernel lists)
a) Who knows how to implement Kernel Mode Settings for this?
b) Are KMS drivers desirable in FreeBSD?
c) Is it in the roadmap for FreeBSD9 or 8.x?
d) Anyone wants to do the work?
probably the
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:53:10AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
First, and this
hasn't changed since the last 15 years, FreeBSD lack in support of
professional Compiler vendors.
I feel your pain.
I'd say that at present FBSD cannot be used as HPC platform.
Even if some things are possible to
В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de пишет:
I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#vectors
and a few links on the topic ...
Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net escribió:
В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de пишет:
I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#vectors
Yes,
On Monday 16 August 2010 15:47:13 emor...@xroff.net wrote:
Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net escribió:
В Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:53:10 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de пишет:
I think that OpenCL can be activated in FreeBSD, if you add the
necessary extensions for clang/llvm ...
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA supported.
http://nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=152742
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA supported.
how is this different from
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
that they very much would
On 08/16/10 16:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for HPC and
that they very much would like to see OpenCL/CUDA
On 08/16/10 21:13, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
To raise awareness that there are people using FreeBSD for
On Monday 16 August 2010 23:00:52 Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/16/10 21:13, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:50:01 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:33:33PM +0300, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I think it might be worthwhile to contact nVidia directly about this.
Hello.
The problem behind the subject is a little bit frustrating, so I do not
know were to start.
I use FreeBSD at my lab and private for scientific stuff. In most cases,
FreeBSD performed sufficiently for tasks we/I had to do. But this
picture has changed.
Modelling atsrodynamical problems
25 matches
Mail list logo
