mkisofs --- for creating iso's
burncd --- for ATAPI CDRW
cdrecord --- for SCSI CDRW, and SCSI emulation of ATAPI CDRW
--
With Best Regards,
Shantanoo Mahajan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Two more questions. 4.8-RELEASE or 4.8_STABLE? I lost my 4.8-stable cd
and need to burn another one. What is the easiest way to burn an iso
file from freebsd?
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:34:38 -0400
"C. Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:51, Bryan Cassidy wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to
> know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is
> better for whatever reasons people use it.
Sho
At 2003-09-29T07:51:57Z, Bryan Cassidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> which is better for whatever reasons people use it.
Define "better" - I'm not being facetious. If by "better" you mean "faster
on common hardware and more stable", then you *probably* want 4.x. If you
mean "has cool new featur
ok,
i am using 5.1 for 2 developemnt servers, 1 programming workstation. i.e: not
production, internal network behind firewall.
so, security and stability are not critical as far as i am concerened.
there is another important reason, my hardware tends to require later versions
of FreeBSD, for exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to
know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is
better for whatever reasons people use it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD
