Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-10 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: As per this announcement I updated my source tree to 'date=2003.03.08.10.10.00' picking a date later than the Mar 4th date of FreeBSD-SA-03:04. My question is that I get: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979,

Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-10 Thread doug
Got it and thank you to all who replied. It is my memory that with some builds I have gotten something other than #0. But maybe that was from building something other than RELENG_4. I the sendmail fix was important enough where I felt the need for some reassurance. Thanks again. On Mon, 10 Mar

Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-10 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Got it and thank you to all who replied. It is my memory that with some builds I have gotten something other than #0. But maybe that was from building something other than RELENG_4. I the sendmail fix was important enough where I felt the need for

Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-10 Thread doug
I cleaned /usr/obj/usr/... but not /usr/src which was at some version of 4.7. Also my root partition is a bit small so I played some games with /modules /modules.old and kernel.old. The count is driven off one of those? I did not mess with anything in /usr/src including /sys/../compile/. On Mon,

Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-10 Thread Mike Meyer
[Context lost to top posting] In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I cleaned /usr/obj/usr/... but not /usr/src which was at some version of 4.7. Also my root partition is a bit small so I played some games with /modules /modules.old and kernel.old. The count is driven off one of

Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-09 Thread doug
As per this announcement I updated my source tree to 'date=2003.03.08.10.10.00' picking a date later than the Mar 4th date of FreeBSD-SA-03:04. From the announcement: 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to the RELENG_5_0, RELENG_4_7, or RELENG_4_6 security branch dated after

Re: Upgrading for FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-09 Thread Jim Mock
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 at 00:47:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As per this announcement I updated my source tree to 'date=2003.03.08.10.10.00' picking a date later than the Mar 4th date of FreeBSD-SA-03:04. From the announcement: 1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-03 Thread Oscar Ricardo Silva
Anybody know how we should approach this for older versions of FreeBSD? Is upgrading source and rebuilding the only way? I was wondering if there were binary versions or patches for older versions so we don't have upgrade, rebuild and reboot. At 09:11 AM 3/3/2003 -0800, FreeBSD Security

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:56:40PM -0600, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote: Anybody know how we should approach this for older versions of FreeBSD? Is upgrading source and rebuilding the only way? I was wondering if there were binary versions or patches for older versions so we don't have

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail

2003-03-03 Thread Mike Meyer
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:56:40PM -0600, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote: Anybody know how we should approach this for older versions of FreeBSD? Is upgrading source and rebuilding the only way? I was wondering if there were binary