Zach Leslie xaque...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/ l
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Also, this particular tool bails out on the unix philosophy, with its
web
gui, ticket tracker etc. Do one thing. Do it well.
I would argue that git bails on that
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:08:13PM -0800, Zach Leslie wrote:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Baptise Daroussin probably could tell us more about fossil pro and cons.
This misses one of of the main points raised in the original
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com wrote:
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:10 AM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com
wrote:
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Baptise Daroussin probably could tell us more about fossil pro and cons.
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
There's a git repository. It's public. You can look at what goes into
the FreeBSD git clone to get your assurance that things aren't being
snuck in. People are using it, right now.
I've always been confused by this. Which source repo is the true source
of truth?
To obtain the FreeBSD source,
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Baptise Daroussin probably could tell us more about fossil pro and cons.
This misses one of of the main points raised in the original post. The
proliferation of git as a revision control system.
Also,
On 19 November 2012 22:04, Zach Leslie xaque...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always been confused by this. Which source repo is the true source
of truth?
This changed a few months ago when ports and doc switched.
As of now:
- SVN is *the* source of truth.
- CVS is exported from svn. It will
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Garrett Wollman woll...@bimajority.org wrote:
the various good uses for nyms.
There are no such uses on the FreeBSD mailing-lists; if you wish for
anyone to pay attention to you, then use a real name. Otherwise,
FOAD.
-GAWollman
It appears you have not
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:59 AM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
joerg_wun...@uriah.heep.sax.de
You don't even have a name
Your domain indicates Germany, please have a chat with CCC.de about
the various good uses for nyms. And consult your library for some
fine historical use cases. If
grarpamp
the various good uses for nyms.
cpgh...@cordula.ws
I hope you realize whom you're trying to lecture here!
Joerg Wunsch is a highly appreciated long-time FreeBSD contributor
Of course. No one here has any question as to anyone's FreeBSD
participation. That would be silly :) I merely
I won't fail to defend general anti-nym opinion or guidance
d-oh, s/defend/defend against/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/11/17/143219/freebsd-project-discloses-security-breach-via-stolen-ssh-key
This is not about this incident, but about why major opensource
projects need to be using a repository that has traceable, verifiable,
joerg_wun...@uriah.heep.sax.de
You don't even have a name
Your domain indicates Germany, please have a chat with CCC.de about
the various good uses for nyms. And consult your library for some
fine historical use cases. If that's counter to your beliefs, you
are free to show us the way and post
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:59:54 -0500, grarpamp wrote:
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
As well summarized by this (your signature) ... sources you can't
verify to the master are, also, sources you can't trust.
Unless. of couse, you are able to use the source
On 18/11/2012 05:21, Robert Simmons wrote:
Yup:
https://github.com/freebsd/
There's also git.freebsd.org.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
18 matches
Mail list logo
