FreeBSD routing problem

2013-10-03 Thread hrkesh sahu
Hi All, I am facing a routing issue for the Interoperability 1.5 topology. Please find the attachment of the exact topology map. As per test setup – Ø Configured REF-Router2 NOT to transmit Router Advertisement on Network1. But REF-Router2 is able to transmit Router Advertisement on

Re: FreeBSD routing problem

2013-10-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
From: hrkesh sahu hrisikeshs...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:09:02 +0530 To: Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com Cc: Polytropon free...@edvax.de, FreeBSD questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hi, No idea why it was To: me. Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-19 Thread Bob Hepple
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:52:22 +1000 Richard Burakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob Hepple wrote: Well, it has to be taught ... eg with a FreeBSD 2.214 I can do this: route delete default route add -net 192.168.254.0 -interface xl0 # !!! route add default 192.168.254.245 cp

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-18 Thread Richard Burakowski
Bob Hepple wrote: Well, it has to be taught ... eg with a FreeBSD 2.214 I can do this: route delete default route add -net 192.168.254.0 -interface xl0 # !!! route add default 192.168.254.245 cp /etc/resolv.conf.home /etc/resolv.conf well, my turn ... from the man page: If the

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-17 Thread Bob Hepple
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:44:07 +1000 Richard Burakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob I'm having a hard time imagining how the packets are finding their way back during your linux testing. How does 2.214 know what to do with the reply when it recieves the echo request from 254.245? Well,

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-16 Thread Richard Burakowski
Bob Hepple wrote: I won't expect that this will work at all, even not with Linux, because the IP 192.168.254.245 and 192.168.2.214 are of different subnets. Either you use 192.168.254.0/24 or 192.168.2.0/24 in the 10baseT net, but not both. I don't know if Linux makes it possible to do this;

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-15 Thread Bob Hepple
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:59:53 +0200 Björn König [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob Hepple wrote: [...] I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my home network 192.168.254.0/24. Under Linux I just do a route add -host 192.168.2.214 eth0 and I can ping

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-15 Thread Andrew P.
On 10/15/05, Bob Hepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I'm new to FreeBSD (5.3) and trying to make the transition from Linux. One thing that has me stumped is a routing question... it must be something really simple because I can do it all the time in Linux. I just want to add an arbitrary

FreeBSD routing

2005-10-14 Thread Bob Hepple
Hello! I'm new to FreeBSD (5.3) and trying to make the transition from Linux. One thing that has me stumped is a routing question... it must be something really simple because I can do it all the time in Linux. I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my home

Re: FreeBSD routing

2005-10-14 Thread Björn König
Bob Hepple wrote: [...] I just want to add an arbitrary machine (eg. with IP 192.168.2.214) to my home network 192.168.254.0/24. Under Linux I just do a route add -host 192.168.2.214 eth0 and I can ping it. On FreeBSD I tried both route add -host 192.168.2.214

Re: FreeBSD routing between 2 interfaces

2003-10-01 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What am I doing wrong? I have 2 networks, 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* FreeBSD 5.1 is connected to both networks via 2 network cards, its ip is 192.168.0.3 and 192.168.1.2. As of now from

FreeBSD routing between 2 interfaces

2003-09-30 Thread freebsd
Dear FreeBSD users, I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What am I doing wrong? I have 2 networks, 192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.* FreeBSD 5.1 is connected to both networks via 2 network cards, its ip is 192.168.0.3 and 192.168.1.2. As of now from the 192.168.1 network I

Re: FreeBSD routing between 2 interfaces

2003-09-30 Thread David Kelly
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear FreeBSD users, I urgenly need to connect 192.168.1.* network to the internet. What am I doing wrong? [...] You forgot natd. Am guessing your DSL or cable modem is doing NAT and assigning an address to your FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD routing between 2 interfaces

2003-09-30 Thread freebsd
You forgot natd. Am guessing your DSL or cable modem is doing NAT and assigning an address to your FreeBSD system. No the modem assigns IP to the 192.168.0.1 router, which in turn acts as gateway for the rest of the network. I only have 1 real IP address. It seems I have NAT already on the

Re: FreeBSD routing between 2 interfaces

2003-09-30 Thread freebsd
Yes I realize about the 10.0... and 192.168 not being routed matter. Previosly I always setup the network but never run out of IP address in the same range(192.168.0.*). It happened this time. Therefore I created the 192.168.1.* network but now it wont route. I can use NAT for that purpose but