Re: Installing multiple ports quietly and efficiently
On Oct 6, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Mel wrote: On Monday 06 October 2008 21:28:25 Kelly Jones wrote: Here's one way to install multiple FreeBSD ports "unattended" on a machine: cd /usr/port/foo/prog1; make install; cd/usr/ports/foo/prog2; make install and so on (perhaps even in a shell script). Two problems: % It's ugly. I'd prefer "cd /usr/ports; make foo/prog1 foo/prog2 ..." % "make install" often pops up windows asking me to choose configuration options, and hangs until I do so. As others said, BATCH turns off config target. But don't clutter /etc/make.conf with stuff like that, cause you will forget you put it there. make -DBATCH is short enough to type. It is however useful to inspect pkg-install files and set variables in either /etc/make.conf or /etc/(profile|login.conf). For example POSTFIX_DEFAULT_MTA will replace /etc/mail/mailer.conf when -DBATCH is set. Over time you'll pick up quite a few of these that save you doing the same thing all over. Either one of: # cd /usr/ports/foo/bar; env BATCH=yes make install clean of # cd /usr/ports/foo/bar; make -DBATCH install clean will work. Both are cleaner than sticking "BATCH = yes" into /etc/ make.conf. You should watch out for three things here. 1. This writes files into the ports database (/var/db/ something...) that sets the configuration of the port the knobs so to speak. So building for example postfix this way will get you a postfix that doesn't have SASL or LDAP or whatever you may actually want. Effectively this sets all the ports "knobs" to the defaults. To chose the knobs on a particular port visit the directory and run make config: # cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix; make config Once you've got the port configured correctly you can run make clean; make deinstall; make install to build and reinstall it to your specs. 2. You may not get exactly want you want. In fact the process my stall in the middle because of conflicts. In the nicest case you will end up with multiple ports that do the same thing. Building postfix with LDAP support for example is likely to result in two copies of the Berkeley Database port being installed. This is okay if they don't conflict. The build will fail if they do. I've seen this a lot on things that need LDAP. Some ports want version 2.3 and others want version 2.4 To get past this you need to figure out which WITH__VER/WANT__VER variables you need to tweak and for that you will need to add to /etc/make.conf 3. You may not get all the pieces that you need. Note carefully that some ports are split into client and server pieces. This largely affects databases (MySQL / PostgreSQL). -- Chris Chris Hilton e: chris|at|vindaloo| dot|com "The pattern juggler lifts his hand; The orchestra begin. As slowly turns the grinding wheel in the court of the crimson king." -- Ian McDonald / Peter Sinfield ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing multiple ports quietly and efficiently
On Monday 06 October 2008 21:28:25 Kelly Jones wrote: > Here's one way to install multiple FreeBSD ports "unattended" on a > machine: > > cd /usr/port/foo/prog1; make install; cd/usr/ports/foo/prog2; make install > > and so on (perhaps even in a shell script). Two problems: > > % It's ugly. I'd prefer "cd /usr/ports; make foo/prog1 foo/prog2 ..." > > % "make install" often pops up windows asking me to choose > configuration options, and hangs until I do so. As others said, BATCH turns off config target. But don't clutter /etc/make.conf with stuff like that, cause you will forget you put it there. make -DBATCH is short enough to type. It is however useful to inspect pkg-install files and set variables in either /etc/make.conf or /etc/(profile|login.conf). For example POSTFIX_DEFAULT_MTA will replace /etc/mail/mailer.conf when -DBATCH is set. Over time you'll pick up quite a few of these that save you doing the same thing all over. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing multiple ports quietly and efficiently
Vincent Hoffman writes: > > I want to install 50 apps on a new server, but not have to watch it > > constantly. I want to tell ports: "just use the default options for > > now: if I'm unhappy w/ them, I'll come back, do a 'make rmconfig' and > > rebuild". > > > > How can I do this? > > add > BATCH=yes > to /etc/make.conf Only if you remember to take it out (or comment it out) again when you're done. Personally, I'd run a new shell, set the variable, do the builds, then kill the shell. Next: edit make.conf and put it in comented out and with additional comments. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing multiple ports quietly and efficiently
Kelly Jones wrote: > Here's one way to install multiple FreeBSD ports "unattended" on a > machine: > > cd /usr/port/foo/prog1; make install; cd/usr/ports/foo/prog2; make install > > and so on (perhaps even in a shell script). Two problems: > > % It's ugly. I'd prefer "cd /usr/ports; make foo/prog1 foo/prog2 ..." > I'd suggest using portupgrade then just portinstall prog1 prog2 prog3 > % "make install" often pops up windows asking me to choose > configuration options, and hangs until I do so. > > > I want to install 50 apps on a new server, but not have to watch it > constantly. I want to tell ports: "just use the default options for > now: if I'm unhappy w/ them, I'll come back, do a 'make rmconfig' and > rebuild". > > How can I do this? > > add BATCH=yes to /etc/make.conf Vince ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Installing multiple ports quietly and efficiently
Here's one way to install multiple FreeBSD ports "unattended" on a machine: cd /usr/port/foo/prog1; make install; cd/usr/ports/foo/prog2; make install and so on (perhaps even in a shell script). Two problems: % It's ugly. I'd prefer "cd /usr/ports; make foo/prog1 foo/prog2 ..." % "make install" often pops up windows asking me to choose configuration options, and hangs until I do so. I want to install 50 apps on a new server, but not have to watch it constantly. I want to tell ports: "just use the default options for now: if I'm unhappy w/ them, I'll come back, do a 'make rmconfig' and rebuild". How can I do this? -- We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that resistance to new ideas and technology is unwise and ultimately futile. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"