On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Scott Long wrote:
With FreeBSD, it's a bit of a toss-up. There is no strong affinity
set or enforced between process memory and where the process is
running. Having some notion of affinity (i.e. NUMA support) would be
a good thing. Oh, and the 4+2 configurations are
In a message dated 2/4/05 11:29:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
D'oh. One other thing. In the benchmarks I've seen, Opterons Play
Nicer with SMP because of the Hypertransport setup in some
applications. (IE, they don't fight over memory the way Xeons do).
Look for a
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
related to FreeBSD?
We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual
opteron @ 2 GHz, both with 4 GB RAM and running the
amd64-port. My impression is that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
related to FreeBSD?
We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual
opteron @ 2 GHz, both with 4 GB RAM and running the
amd64-port. My
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:37:08 +0100 (CET), Claus Guttesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
related to FreeBSD?
We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual
opteron
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:38:43 -0800, Astrodog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:37:08 +0100 (CET), Claus Guttesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
Astrodog wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:37:08 +0100 (CET), Claus Guttesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
related to FreeBSD?
We have a dual xeon (nocona) @ 3.2 GHz and a dual
Astrodog wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:38:43 -0800, Astrodog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:37:08 +0100 (CET), Claus Guttesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost
as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically
Hey all,
Just looking for general opinions and/or advice regarding use of one over
the other.
Cost wise, AMD Opteron 246 is roughly the same cost as a 3.0Ghz Xeon ... But
how do they compare performance wise; specifically related to FreeBSD?
(Not subscribed to both lists I sent this to, please
I think this would depend on your application, but I have hear allot
of good things about AMD 64.
--Nick
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:04:21 -0500, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Just looking for general opinions and/or advice regarding use of one over
the other.
Cost wise,
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:41:43 -0700, Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this would depend on your application, but I have hear allot
of good things about AMD 64.
--Nick
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:04:21 -0500, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Just looking for
11 matches
Mail list logo