I like this idea. It's not fun when you try to update your system, then
have to spend time fixing things.
On 3/15/06, Jason C. Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote:
Is there a stable ports tree?
No.
However you
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote:
Is there a stable ports tree?
No.
However you can sup the ports tree for a specific release. I run ports
using tag=RELEASE_6_0_0. The reason I do this is that I find it to be
much less work.
I am a much
Is there a stable ports tree?
I think I read somewhere that RELEASE/STABLE/SECURITY/CURRENT is for the
core OS, and that the ports tree is always CURRENT. Is this true?
I would like to be able to update my ports with the best chance of not
hitting any snags, so I was curious.
thx
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Xn Nooby wrote:
Is there a stable ports tree?
No.
Kris
pgpzOUQtJc2ZP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
