I have recently upgraded my system to 8.0, and in the
course of doing so, have migrated most filesystems
onto a new drive.
I have noticed, since the upgrade, several instances
where a very long pause occurs during which time one
or more process is in uninterruptible device wait.
This seems to
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:46 AM, A. Wright and...@qemg.org wrote:
I have recently upgraded my system to 8.0, and in the
course of doing so, have migrated most filesystems
onto a new drive.
Did you dd it across? If so, that's kind of a no-no in some situtation as
the boundries won't be
Hi,
Please check ticket 24493915
--
Best Regards
Dennis
Server Engineer
Hosting Services, Inc.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
At 09:46 AM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
While I will run some further tests here, I thought I would
ask:
Is anyone else seeing poor disk I/O scheduling or locking
behaviour in 8.0?
Hi,
On my backup server I am seeing somewhat better
throughput/performance, at least
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 09:46 AM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
Does anyone have any thoughts on how to conclusively
prove that the drive is at fault? I have not seen any
errors logged to dmesg.
Start with smartmontools to ask your disk if it has logged any errors
and check
Hi--
On May 12, 2010, at 12:48 PM, A. Wright wrote:
So I ran the short test, and am now running the long test. After
the short test, I have been examining the output (using smartctl -a),
and there seem to be no errors reports.
Show us the output of smartctl -a...? It can be a bit difficult
At 03:48 PM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
I just noticed, however, the following two interesting lines that
/var/log/messages seems to have acquired:
May 12 15:44:00 qemg kernel: ad8: FAILURE - SMART
status=51READY,DSC,ERROR error=4ABORTED
May 12 16:05:27 qemg kernel: swap_pager:
Sorry to follow myself up . . .
On Wed, 12 May 2010, A. Wright wrote:
I just noticed, however, the following two interesting lines that
/var/log/messages seems to have acquired:
May 12 15:44:00 qemg kernel: ad8: FAILURE - SMART status=51READY,DSC,ERROR
error=4ABORTED
May 12
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On May 12, 2010, at 12:48 PM, A. Wright wrote:
So I ran the short test, and am now running the long test. After
the short test, I have been examining the output (using smartctl -a),
and there seem to be no errors reports.
Show us the output of
At 04:27 PM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: WDC WD15EARS-00S8B1
Serial Number:WD-WCAVY2700359
Isnt that one of those Western Digital Green drives ? I seem to
recall a number of people complaining about similar issues where the
drive
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 04:27 PM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: WDC WD15EARS-00S8B1
Serial Number:WD-WCAVY2700359
Isnt that one of those Western Digital Green drives ? I seem to recall a
Hi--
On May 12, 2010, at 1:27 PM, A. Wright wrote:
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always
- 383
10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0032 100 253 000Old_age Always
- 0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 253 000
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Mike Tancsa
m...@sentex.netmailto:m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 04:27 PM 5/12/2010, A. Wright wrote:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: WDC WD15EARS-00S8B1
Serial Number:WD-WCAVY2700359
Isnt that
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Thanks for real data to work from.
Thanks for the assistance!
There's no signs of surface failure with high reallocated
sectors or anything, but your drive is parking it's heads nearly
100 times an hour. Someone else suggested this was a green
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:21 PM, A. Wright and...@qemg.org wrote:
This is indeed one of the so-called eco drives.
The controller is set to SATA (no mention of ahci, though I will
now look at it as suggested earlier to see if I can control the
problem that way).
In addition to what I
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:21 PM, A. Wright
and...@qemg.orgmailto:and...@qemg.org wrote:
As far as I can tell, it is a standard 512 byte sector. The
general lack of documentation with this drive (shipped in a
plastic coffin -- the only docs
16 matches
Mail list logo
