>-Original Message-
>From: Gilbert Fernandes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:30 AM
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Mach kernel and Unix over 68k : well before OS X (Was: Status
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:55:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 28. [OT] Re: Mach kernel and Unix over 68k : well before OS X
> (Roland Smith)
>
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:47:13 +0100
> From: Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [OT] Re: Mach kern
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:47 AM, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:29:41PM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
But "Unix" has been available for MacOS users for a long time,
far before MacOS X went out and using a Mach kernel.
It has been since 1996, over a Mach kernel.
Apple had its
Additionally, Apple had AU/X running on Macs before even machten.
Natively.
Chad
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
Consider that when MacOS moved to UNIX that all the UNIX software
vendors could now easily port their applications to Macintosh.
Excuse me, sir.
Your di
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:29:41PM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> But "Unix" has been available for MacOS users for a long time,
> far before MacOS X went out and using a Mach kernel.
>
> It has been since 1996, over a Mach kernel.
Apple had its own UNIX running on 68k hardware since 1998: A/
> Consider that when MacOS moved to UNIX that all the UNIX software
> vendors could now easily port their applications to Macintosh.
Excuse me, sir.
Your discussion is pretty impressive and I have been reading it
with care. Honestly, I am far from having a distant enough picture
of the whole say
