Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-07 Thread lokada...@gmx.de

On 02.06.2013 22:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and 
memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 
32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for 
hundreds of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



Looks like there is set up to 128 maxcpu (or no limit) since FBSD 9.0.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=13261

Memory i don't know.
With 64Bit it should many ram avaible.

Greeting

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-07 Thread Mark Moellering

On 6/7/2013 7:52 PM, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:

On 02.06.2013 22:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and 
memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 
32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for 
hundreds of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



Looks like there is set up to 128 maxcpu (or no limit) since FBSD 9.0.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=13261

Memory i don't know.
With 64Bit it should many ram avaible.

Greeting

In theory, max RAM would be 18446744073709551616 bits (2^64)  I know it 
is possible to configure a system with 64 cores (4 x 16-core cpus).  
However, I haven't seen definitive tests on scaling that far.  Last I 
saw, somewhere in the 6 to 8 core range, you really hit the point of 
diminishing returns.  If you are doing lots of jails, I would suggest 
splitting up 'sets' of jails and limiting them to run on a group of 
specific cores.  In the above configuration, you could have 8 groups of 
8 cpu-cores, each handling a specific set of jails.


Good luck

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-03 Thread Michael Powell
Al Plant wrote:

 James wrote:
 Several modest servers applied well will take you further than one big
 iron—and for less cost.
 
 James I agree. I have witnessed the benefit of what you say. Putting
 your faith in one big server can be a problem if the box fails,
 especially hardware failure.
 
 Keeping a spare server in a rack that can be switched in to service
 quickly can save you if one dies. Time (waiting for parts), most
 failures are hardware if your running FreeBSD. Even most Linux boxes.
 

There are 2 approaches, and applying both together is what I favor. Scale up 
(vertical) is a horsepower per box kind of thing. Scale out (horizontal) 
adds more of the same kind of box(es) in parallel. The resulting redundancy 
will keep you up and online.

Sizing matters somewhat. Having excess horsepower that sits unused is extra 
money spent on one box that could have been applied to scale out redundancy. 
If you can size one machine to match your current and projected workload, 
then if there are two, or more, of these and one fails the remaining can 
shoulder the load while you get the broken one back up.

Where the balance point is struck will depend on workload. Let's say 
(hypothetical) one box as a web/database server can handle 1,000 
connections/users per second within desired latency and response time. If a 
spike in demand suddenly comes that box will slow to a crawl (or even fall 
over) as it tries to keep up, as it is lacking the extra horsepower overhead 
that would otherwise be sitting idle if it did. Scaling out (horizontally) 
by adding more boxes will distribute this spike across multiple machines and 
remain within the desired processing response/latency time so together they 
can handle 2,000 when the need is present. Need another 1,000? Add another 
box, and so on.

So the trick is to understand your workload. Don't go overboard on just one  
huge high-power machine which sits mostly idle and takes you offline if it 
fails. Spend the money on more moderately sized boxen. Me, I like to have at 
least 3 of everything (if I can) such that they are sized so that 2 of them 
together can easily handle the desired load. The third one is for redundancy 
and the 'what-if' spike in demand.

Another advantage here is you can take one offline for updates, then put it 
back online and test it out for problems. If there is no problem then you 
can take one of the other two down and update it. This way you can do 
updates without your service being offline. But the trick is still to 
understand your specific workload first, then spread the money around 
accordingly.

-Mike


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-03 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 02/06/2013 21:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
 I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and
 memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and
 32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for
 hundreds of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
It'll certainly support it, the biggest server I FreeBSD on at the
moment is:

root@parisnfsen:~ # head -20 /var/run/dmesg.boot
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #4 r249837: Wed Apr 24 13:37:24 CEST 2013
r...@parisnfsen.nottellingyou.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARISNFSEN amd64
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5620  @ 2.40GHz (2394.05-MHz
K8-class CPU)
  Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x206c2  Family = 0x6  Model = 0x2c 
Stepping = 2
 
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
 
Features2=0x29ee3ffSSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AESNI
  AMD Features=0x2c100800SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM
  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
  TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
real memory  = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
avail memory = 33090797568 (31557 MB)
Event timer LAPIC quality 600
ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 16 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 SMT threads

as other people have said though, one big server is often not the best
answer, keep things like disk io and resiliency in mind.
This is a PowerEdge R410 seems to be pretty happy trundling along on
9-STABLE

Vince
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-03 Thread Gezeala M . Bacuño II
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Vincent Hoffman vi...@unsane.co.uk wrote:

 On 02/06/2013 21:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
  I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and
  memory size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and
  32gb of memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for
  hundreds of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
  freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 It'll certainly support it, the biggest server I FreeBSD on at the
 moment is:

 root@parisnfsen:~ # head -20 /var/run/dmesg.boot
 Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
 Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
 FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
 FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #4 r249837: Wed Apr 24 13:37:24 CEST 2013
 r...@parisnfsen.nottellingyou.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PARISNFSEN
 amd64
 gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5620  @ 2.40GHz (2394.05-MHz
 K8-class CPU)
   Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x206c2  Family = 0x6  Model = 0x2c
 Stepping = 2


 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE


 Features2=0x29ee3ffSSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AESNI
   AMD Features=0x2c100800SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM
   AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
   TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
 real memory  = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
 avail memory = 33090797568 (31557 MB)
 Event timer LAPIC quality 600
 ACPI APIC Table: DELL   PE_SC3  
 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 16 CPUs
 FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) x 2 SMT threads

 as other people have said though, one big server is often not the best
 answer, keep things like disk io and resiliency in mind.
 This is a PowerEdge R410 seems to be pretty happy trundling along on
 9-STABLE

 Vince


works fine with this:

Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #3: Tue Dec 27 14:14:29 PST 2011

r...@build9x64.pcbsd.org:/usr/obj/builds/amd64/pcbsd-build90/fbsd-source/9.0/sys/GENERIC
amd64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 8837  @ 2.67GHz (2666.81-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x206f2  Family = 6  Model = 2f  Stepping =
2

Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE

Features2=0x29ee3ffSSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AESNI
  AMD Features=0x2c100800SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM
  AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
  TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
real memory  = 549755813888 (524288 MB)
avail memory = 532166148096 (507513 MB)
Event timer LAPIC quality 600
ACPI APIC Table: ALASKA A M I
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 64 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 8 package(s) x 8 core(s)
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  2
 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  4

 cpu63 (AP): APIC ID: 242
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-02 Thread Fbsd8
I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and memory 
size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 32gb of 
memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for hundreds 
of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-02 Thread Joshua Isom
You mean like a high end rack mount server that's FreeBSD's primary use? 
 One catch about ram, the faster ram comes in smaller sticks.  I have 
four 8Gb sticks for 32Gb, but it's not the fastest ram.  The fastest ram 
tends to be 2Gb sticks.  At the moment, FreeBSD's set to a max of 64 
cores on amd64, that's threads for Intel, but it can be changed if you 
actually need it.  Newegg has a quad socket xeon 4U system that has a 
total of 40 cores/80 threads, and comes with 128GB of ram.  It will set 
you back over $30k.


You'll need to make a compromise about memory and cpu.  A lot of games 
aren't overly multithreaded because most people aren't even quad core 
yet.  The fastest per core processors aren't the fastest overall.  Look 
at cpubenchmark.net's top speed page and compare it to the single 
threaded page.  Which do you think will do a game better and which will 
do 100 jails better?


On 6/2/2013 3:34 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:

I'm a sub second speed freak. What is the max number of cpu's and memory
size that Freebsd can handle? Can it handle 16 4ghz cpu's and 32gb of
memory? I need a gaming server with some really big balls for hundreds
of jails. Money is not a deciding factor here, horse power is.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-02 Thread James
Several modest servers applied well will take you further than one big
iron—and for less cost.

-- 
James.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Max top end computer for Freebsd to run on

2013-06-02 Thread Al Plant

James wrote:

Several modest servers applied well will take you further than one big
iron—and for less cost.


James I agree. I have witnessed the benefit of what you say. Putting 
your faith in one big server can be a problem if the box fails, 
especially hardware failure.


Keeping a spare server in a rack that can be switched in to service 
quickly can save you if one dies. Time (waiting for parts), most 
failures are hardware if your running FreeBSD. Even most Linux boxes.




~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii -  Phone:  808-284-2740
  + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
  + http://aloha50.net   - Supporting - FreeBSD  7.2 - 8.0 - 9* +
   email: n...@hdk5.net 
All that's really worth doing is what we do for others.- Lewis Carrol

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org