> Now, this is another question I've had:
>
> what's the advantage of the ipfilter package over natd/ipfw?
>
> James
>
>
Well, it's mostly personal prefrence from what I can tell... I like it
because it's rules are easier to read, and it has a lot of nice
monitoring tools that allow you to monitor
Now, this is another question I've had:
what's the advantage of the ipfilter package over natd/ipfw?
James
>From: Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: James West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
> You could run two natd daemons on the gateway machine, one for the win
> machine and one for the macs. Just start another natd listening on
> another port, and add a ipfw divert rule to send the traffic from the
> macs through this new natd.
Or you could use ipfilter+ipnat, and just add two red
James West wrote:
> I'm fairly new to FreeBSD coming from a linux background.
>
> My problem is probably simple, but I'm having a hard time with it. I
> have four boxes, one FreeBSD that acts as a gateway/NAT router/Firewall,
> a Windows2k workstation, and two old Mac workstations.
>
> Being u
I'm fairly new to FreeBSD coming from a linux background.
My problem is probably simple, but I'm having a hard time with it. I have
four boxes, one FreeBSD that acts as a gateway/NAT router/Firewall, a
Windows2k workstation, and two old Mac workstations.
Being unable to afford a 10/100 hub rig
