Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
There is one more point to check : >From your mount information , in the server , directories are on DIFFERENT drives . Assume one of the drives is very "INTELLIGENT" to save power . During local reading , due to reading speed , it may not go to "SLEEP" , but during network access , it may go t

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 03/16/2013 10:15 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Tim Daneliuk mailto:tun...@tundraware.com>> wrote: On 03/16/2013 05:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Michael W. Lucas in Absolute FeeBSD , 2nd Edition , ( ISBN : 978-1-59327-151-0 ) ,

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 03/16/2013 05:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> >> > Michael W. Lucas in Absolute FeeBSD , 2nd Edition , ( ISBN : >> 978-1-59327-151-0 ) , >> is suggesting the following ( p. 248 ) : >> >> In client ( mount , or , fstab ) , use o

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 03/16/2013 05:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Michael W. Lucas in Absolute FeeBSD , 2nd Edition , ( ISBN : 978-1-59327-151-0 ) , is suggesting the following ( p. 248 ) : In client ( mount , or , fstab ) , use options ( -o tcp , intr , soft , -w=32768 , -r=32768 ) tcp option will

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread iamatt
just slap an netapp 8.x with an avere flash box in front if you want NFS performance... or isilon. On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>>

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> >> >> > >> With respect to your mount points : /usr1 is spanning TWO different >> partitions : >> >> /dev/ad4s1f390G127G231G35%/usr1 >> /dev/ad6s1d902G710G

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: With respect to your mount points : /usr1 is spanning TWO different partitions : /dev/ad4s1f390G127G231G35%/usr1 /dev/ad6s1d902G710G120G86%/usr1/BKU because /usr1/BKU is a sub-directory of /usr1

Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > This is really weird. A FreeBSD 9.1 system mounts the following: > > /dev/ad4s1a989M625M285M69%/ > devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev > /dev/ad4s1d7.8G 1G6.1G14%/var > /dev/ad4s1e

NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder

2013-03-16 Thread Tim Daneliuk
This is really weird. A FreeBSD 9.1 system mounts the following: /dev/ad4s1a989M625M285M69%/ devfs 1.0k1.0k 0B 100%/dev /dev/ad4s1d7.8G 1G6.1G14%/var /dev/ad4s1e 48G9.4G 35G21%/usr /dev/ad4s1f390G127G