Re: net/netatalk afpd causes abort on amd64?

2011-08-09 Thread Koichiro Iwao
Avahi was the problem, and wasn't working on my system. After I started avahi relevant daemons, afpd is working fine now. I still have another problem using TimeMachine with OS X Lion. Current portversion of netatalk supports AFP 3.3, right? Anyway, thank you for your instructions. I'll try

net/netatalk afpd causes abort on amd64?

2011-08-08 Thread Kouichiro Iwao
Hi. After upgraded to current portversion of netatalk, I cannot start netatalk. I do rc.d/netatalk start then afpd fails SIGABRT. On i386 freebsd, netatalk/afpd works fine. Any solutions to use netatalk on amd64? pid 19160 (afpd), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) pid 19175 (afpd), uid 0

Re: net/netatalk afpd causes abort on amd64?

2011-08-08 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On 8/8/11 7:46 AM, Kouichiro Iwao wrote: Hi. After upgraded to current portversion of netatalk, I cannot start netatalk. I do rc.d/netatalk start then afpd fails SIGABRT. On i386 freebsd, netatalk/afpd works fine. Any solutions to use netatalk on amd64? pid 19160 (afpd), uid 0: exited

Re: net/netatalk afpd causes abort on amd64?

2011-08-08 Thread FBSD UG
Beekman On 8 aug 2011, at 13:46, Kouichiro Iwao wrote: Hi. After upgraded to current portversion of netatalk, I cannot start netatalk. I do rc.d/netatalk start then afpd fails SIGABRT. On i386 freebsd, netatalk/afpd works fine. Any solutions to use netatalk on amd64? pid 19160 (afpd), uid 0

Re: Fwd: [Netatalk-devel] Fwd: unable to install netatalk

2010-06-09 Thread Thiago Esteves
Thank you very much, Joe. After update my ports tree again I got the patch and the issue was resolved. Regards, Thiago On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Thiago Esteves thgeste...@gmail.com wrote: It seems that there isn't any patch for dsi.h on netatalk/files directory: Prescott:files root$ ls

unable to install netatalk

2010-06-04 Thread Thiago Esteves
Hello all, I am getting errors while trying to install netatalk from ports collection. I am running release 6.3 p15 (I know it has already passed its end-of-life date, I will update it as soon as possible). My ports tree is updated. Any help is welcome. Here is the output: *libtool: link: (cd

Re: MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-24 Thread Vincent Zee
On 23 August 2009, at 10:56, andrew clarke wrote: On Sun 2009-08-23 10:24:53 UTC+0200, Vincent Zee (zen...@xs4all.nl) wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for netatalk-2.0.4,1 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum

MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-23 Thread Vincent Zee
Hi, I'm trying to update the netatalk port to its newest version. uname -a FreeBSD piggie.int.daemon.net 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I use portmaster -a to update the ports but when it reaches

Re: MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-23 Thread andrew clarke
On Sun 2009-08-23 10:24:53 UTC+0200, Vincent Zee (zen...@xs4all.nl) wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for netatalk-2.0.4,1 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. I'm getting

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-24 Thread Gabriel Dragffy
print servers only speak AFP AFP handles the split resource/data fork properly, Samba does not. You will see this in a number of minor ways. To get it running: define NETATALK in kernel and recompile cd /usr/ports/net/netatalk make WITH_SRVLOC=yes install add the following in /etc/rc.conf

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-24 Thread Andrea Venturoli
work around, but for filenames encoding I could not find a solution. netatalk, on the other side, works flawlessly. I'm still trying to educate my users to avoid exotic characters in file names, but I cannot ask them to rename thousands of files they already have. (Just my two cents

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Martin Hepworth
Why you need netatalk - you still got some old MacOS 8/9 machines about? -- martin On 9/22/07, Gabriel Dragffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been following several different tutorials on the net for getting netatalk working. I've compiled in the neccessary option to the kernel, installed

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Gabriel Dragffy
On 23 Sep 2007, at 16:13, Martin Hepworth wrote: Why you need netatalk - you still got some old MacOS 8/9 machines about? -- no, they are all os x macbook pros. However we sometimes access over the internet using AFP, and this uses encrypted passwords which is safer. Also, afp

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Martin Hepworth
2007, at 16:13, Martin Hepworth wrote: Why you need netatalk - you still got some old MacOS 8/9 machines about? -- no, they are all os x macbook pros. However we sometimes access over the internet using AFP, and this uses encrypted passwords which is safer. Also, afp integrates very

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Gabriel Dragffy
On 23 Sep 2007, at 19:14, Martin Hepworth wrote: Beg to differ on the AFP vs samb issues from what we use at work using a mixed environment (*nix, windoze and Mac's). the filetyping goes alot better using smb than appletalk with MacOS X, and smb will use encrypted passwds (however poorly

Re: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Albert Shih
Le 23/09/2007 à 19:55:37+0100, Gabriel Dragffy a écrit On 23 Sep 2007, at 19:14, Martin Hepworth wrote: Beg to differ on the AFP vs samb issues from what we use at work using a mixed environment (*nix, windoze and Mac's). the filetyping goes alot better using smb than appletalk with

RE: Netatalk

2007-09-23 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
resource/data fork properly, Samba does not. You will see this in a number of minor ways. To get it running: define NETATALK in kernel and recompile cd /usr/ports/net/netatalk make WITH_SRVLOC=yes install add the following in /etc/rc.conf: slpd_enable=YES netatalk_enable=YES atalkd_enable=YES

Netatalk

2007-09-22 Thread Gabriel Dragffy
I've been following several different tutorials on the net for getting netatalk working. I've compiled in the neccessary option to the kernel, installed the port. Added various things to rc.conf, run / usr/local/etc/rc.d/netatalk start and... nothing :( I think the problem is that all

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-11 Thread Bob Hall
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 02:37:23PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: To my knowledge, the effects in /etc/hosts.allow are immediate as soon as you save the modified file. And I have been using it that way for many years. No need to killall -HUP inetd, no need to reboot. If after a change the

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-11 Thread Bob Hall
to this in the archives. Searching the archives, Googling, and experimentation still haven't turned up an answer to the two below. How do I compile netatalk without CUPS? I don't see any obvious switches, but there has to be something that tells Make to use CUPS, because it gives a message saying

Re: netatalk, NFS, OS X and backup

2005-01-10 Thread Martin Hepworth
, 7 Jan 2005 11:29:59 -0500, Alan Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need some advice about integrating my FreeBSD server with some Macs running OS X. I have a server running FreeBSD 5.3 with NFS and netatalk enabled, a Powerbook G4 running OS X 10.3.7 and they are connected through a wireless

Re: netatalk, NFS, OS X and backup

2005-01-10 Thread Shane Ambler
X. I have a server running FreeBSD 5.3 with NFS and netatalk enabled, a Powerbook G4 running OS X 10.3.7 and they are connected through a wireless network. I used the Powerbook to administer the server using ssh, which works well. I would also like to use the server to backup files

Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-10 Thread Bob Hall
Three questions: How do I cause changes in the hosts.allow file to take effect without rebooting? Everything I've seen says to restart inetd, but I'm not using inetd. How do I compile netatalk without CUPS? I don't see any obvious switches, but there has to be something that tells Make to use

Re: Hosts.allow and netatalk/cups

2005-01-10 Thread Olivier Nicole
To my knowledge, the effects in /etc/hosts.allow are immediate as soon as you save the modified file. And I have been using it that way for many years. No need to killall -HUP inetd, no need to reboot. If after a change the service is still not available: - you did not allow the right thing -

netatalk, NFS, OS X and backup

2005-01-07 Thread Alan Curtis
I need some advice about integrating my FreeBSD server with some Macs running OS X. I have a server running FreeBSD 5.3 with NFS and netatalk enabled, a Powerbook G4 running OS X 10.3.7 and they are connected through a wireless network. I used the Powerbook to administer the server using ssh

Problem connecting with Netatalk 2.0

2004-12-16 Thread frank6055-groups
This is what helped in my case: If you used an earlier version of Netatalk before (like 1.6) then there are hidden Mac files in the Linux home directories (e.g. .AppleDB). This happens because typically all home directories are shared by the standard version of the AppleVolumes.default. Those

starting netatalk

2004-12-03 Thread Alan Curtis
I am trying to use netatalk-2.0.1 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE. I can start afpd manually by /usr/local/sbin/afpd -s /usr/local/etc/AppleVolumes.system -f /usr/local/etc/AppleVolumes.default and can access the share from my Mac OS X machine. There is a script /usr/local/etc/rc.d/netatalk.sh

Re: starting netatalk

2004-12-03 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:01:54PM -0500, Alan Curtis wrote: I am trying to use netatalk-2.0.1 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE. I can start afpd manually by /usr/local/sbin/afpd -s /usr/local/etc/AppleVolumes.system -f /usr/local/etc/AppleVolumes.default and can access the share from my Mac OS

Re: starting netatalk

2004-12-03 Thread Michael L. Squires
Do you have options NETATALK in your kernel? It's not in the GENERIC kernel, and you'll need to compile a new kernel (or at least I did, the last time I installed netatalk). Mike Squires ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Problem connecting with Netatalk 2.0

2004-10-20 Thread Jim Arnold
I upgraded netatalk from 1.5 to 2.0 and now cannot connect to my FreeBSD box. I've altered the netatalk.sh file to this: netatalk_enable=${netatalk_enable-YES} atalkd_enable=${atalkd_enable-YES} papd_enable=${papd_enable-NO} cnid_metad_enable=${cnid_metad_enable-NO} afpd_enable=${afpd_enable-YES

How to start netatalk?

2004-10-18 Thread Choy Kho Yee
Hi, I want to share files between FreeBSD 5.3 and Mac OS X. I have compiled my kernel with the NETATALK option, and installed netatalk 2.0 from the port. What should I do now? --- Choy Kho Yee url: http://dotkoyi.infoseek.ne.jp/ blog: http://dotkoyi.blogspot.com/ There are only 10 types of people

Re: How to start netatalk?

2004-10-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 07:37:30PM +0900, Choy Kho Yee wrote: Hi, I want to share files between FreeBSD 5.3 and Mac OS X. I have compiled my kernel with the NETATALK option, and installed netatalk 2.0 from the port. What should I do now? Forget all about netatalk -- that's a hold over from

Re: How to start netatalk?

2004-10-18 Thread Choy Kho Yee
On 2004/10/18, at 20:33, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 07:37:30PM +0900, Choy Kho Yee wrote: Hi, I want to share files between FreeBSD 5.3 and Mac OS X. I have compiled my kernel with the NETATALK option, and installed netatalk 2.0 from the port. What should I do now? Forget all

help with Netatalk

2004-07-15 Thread alvaro rosales
Hi guys I gwould like to configure netatalkd to downcase all the name files whe they are created. Is it passible?. I am running freebsd 5.1. Greetings and thanks in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free

Netatalk with 5.0?

2003-06-05 Thread David Kelly
Having upgraded a non-critical system to 5.1-BETA from 4.8 by wiping the drives and starting from scratch, just how does one add NETATALK to the new kernel config? I don't see it in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES and we no longer have LINT... I do see netatalk at /usr/src/sys/netatalk/ but nothing

Problems with Netatalk 1.6

2003-01-22 Thread repairshop
I want to have netatalk 1.6 to run on it. But after ./configure comes only: error Berkeley DB3 not found What can I do? Helmut -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging more http://www.gmx.net +++ NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Problems with Netatalk 1.6

2003-01-22 Thread Paul Everlund
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to have netatalk 1.6 to run on it. But after ./configure comes only: error Berkeley DB3 not found What can I do? Helmut Are you installing it from the ports-system? Did you go to /usr/ports/net/netatalk and run make? If you want

Re: Problems with Netatalk 1.6

2003-01-22 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 10:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to have netatalk 1.6 to run on it. But after ./configure comes only: error Berkeley DB3 not found What can I do? Build Netatalk from ports: # cd /usr/ports/net/netatalk # make install clean Else, you can patch the default

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-12 Thread Jim Arnold
This is baffling. I have a OS X 10.2.3 machine that can connect just fine (as do you). The sniffer traces are more or less identical. Since it looks like the OS X client is initiating the disconnect, can you bring up the OS X console under Applications-Utilities-Console, and see if any

Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Jim Arnold
I am running netatalk-1.6.0_1,1 from the FreeBSD ports systems on two boxes and connecting from Mac OS X 10.2.3. Now when I connect from one box I get the following error on the mac: Connection failed An AppleShare system error occurred. I can connect to the other box without any problems

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 18:00, Jim Arnold wrote: I am running netatalk-1.6.0_1,1 from the FreeBSD ports systems on two boxes and connecting from Mac OS X 10.2.3. Now when I connect from one box I get the following error on the mac: Connection failed An AppleShare system error occurred

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 19:12, Jim Arnold wrote: The log isn't too helpful, but a sniffer trace might be. Can you capture the client connection to the bad server with tcpdump, and send me the raw capture file. I recommend the following command line: tcpdump -s 1518 -w /tmp/outfile host

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Jim Arnold
Do you have a custom volume icon on this server? If so, try deleting it, then reconnection. Nope. Nothing fancy. Just a straight install of Netatalk and I didn't change any of the icons. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 20:40, Jim Arnold wrote: Do you have a custom volume icon on this server? If so, try deleting it, then reconnection. Nope. Nothing fancy. Just a straight install of Netatalk and I didn't change any of the icons. When exactly do you see the message? Right after

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Jim Arnold
as well as your afpd.conf files? Everything in this file is commented out. In the file this is noted: The simplest case is to not have an afpd.conf I've always run Netatalk without anything in this file without any problems. Does the user you're logging in as have a valid shell? Yes

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
the ~ (tilde) at the end so the home directory will get mounted as well as your afpd.conf files? Everything in this file is commented out. In the file this is noted: The simplest case is to not have an afpd.conf I've always run Netatalk without anything in this file without any problems. Does

Re: Netatalk - Mac OS X connection problem

2003-01-11 Thread Jim Arnold
This is baffling. I have a OS X 10.2.3 machine that can connect just fine (as do you). The sniffer traces are more or less identical. Since it looks like the OS X client is initiating the disconnect, can you bring up the OS X console under Applications-Utilities-Console, and see if any

netatalk port and remote printing

2002-10-27 Thread mh
* not right (though not obvious to me). I have installed the netatalk port, and am having problems identifying the printer to the add_netatalk_printer program. Does anyone know: 1) is this the correct way to configure a printer so the Mac can use it? 2) is there any good documentation anywhere