[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
up with such a
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think it's a big joke?
The new logo already looks dated,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
up with such a terrible logo. It seems people think
accountable for
their collective actions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM
To: Kep Woof
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05
Hi,
thanks for the pointer..
On 5/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This happened ages ago and was announced in the news section of the
website
See - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/
However, where were the other designs? I think a contest was
potentially a good
On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +
Kep Woof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that
has
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:48 AM
To: Kep Woof
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take
fbsd wrote:
Thank you for making my point.
This should have been announced on all lists.
Just not the announcement list.
Changing the logo is really a big thing.
Yes. But the point of having a announce list is so that important
announcements are not jumbled in with lots of where can I
Hi,
On 5/10/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're exactly right. Somebody other than you should take care of this.
I'm trying to understand what has happened and why. I'm trying to
take care of this, and you, with your accusations and vitriol are'nt
helping. I want to understand
Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and unelegent logo that
has nothing to do with anythin, save for a pair of post-modern ice
cream cones
-
From: Nick Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:13:24 -0400
fbsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
announcement
Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
that I like for a screensaver?
I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve
Ballmer responded to a complaint that his shiny
Hi,
However, where were the other designs?
I was wondering about that myself...
Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done.
Netbsd logo is very nice indeed.
The simple fact is, when you look at the new logo it only makes sense
if you previously understand what it
At 17:42 10.05.2006, Jeff Rollin wrote:
Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
that I like for a screensaver?
I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last time Steve
Ballmer
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:49:20PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
What are the key values of FreeBSD? I'd guess
something like Freedom, Stability, Robustness, quality.
The current logo looks like a FAT bloated Beastie that swallowed
up too much code... [recently compiled 4.11 and 6.1, and it shows...]
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
yourself.
What is the procedure to fix a logo?
use send-pr(1), of course!
Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window
open for a new try? I humbly suggest
On 10/5/06 13:13, fbsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a long time reader of this list I did not see any
announcement of it here. Only after selection of the
new logo was made was it talked about on this list
People were very up set with it them and the ground
swell over this has only gotten
On 10/5/06 15:25, fbsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your negtave comments are foundless.
A public vote is not an logistical near-impossibility.
Hell just creating a special list to submit an email
to as your yes or not vote is a simple solution and other
solutions could be found one way or the
On 10/5/06 16:42, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone else think its a logo get over it? When was the last time an
IT admin went I installed Win 2k3 becuase it has that cool logo thing
that I like for a screensaver?
I think it's a bigger problem than that. When was the last
On 10/5/06 18:24, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
yourself.
What is the procedure to fix a logo?
use send-pr(1), of course!
Since we're talking about logos: when will the
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Many professional logo design people never even knew about
the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted
to the questions list where everyone reads.
Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On 10/5/06 18:24, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
yourself.
What is the procedure to fix a logo?
use
I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all.
That's no reason to tell lies.
There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any
evidence, either.
Can't wait till you get caught out.
Jeff.
___
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:51:10PM +, cpghost wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On 10/5/06 18:24, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:44:03PM +, Kep Woof wrote:
This is free software man, if you don't like it, fix it
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:00:49PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote:
I for one do not see an need to change the logo at all.
That's no reason to tell lies.
There's no reason to accuse people of telling lies without having any
evidence, either.
Statements were made which are provably untrue.
Since we're talking about logos: when will the next time window
open for a new try? I humbly suggest using 'FreeBSD' (the text,
Good idea. The word FreeBSD as it stood at the top of the
freebsd.orgmainpage the day before the release of
6.1-RELEASE was nice.
There were tens of
cpghost wrote:
Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-(
Yes, it explains that some people are too busy to read hundreds of
messages on this list, and would rather do something else like coding.
___
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:47:44PM +, cpghost wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
Many professional logo design people never even knew about
the contest to redesign the logo because it was not posted
to the questions list where everyone reads.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:33:14PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Not everyone reads the questions list. Heck, not even all the
developers do, due to the low signal/noise ratio here.
Uh-oh! A mindset like this would explain a lot of things. :-(
Fortunately, there *are* developers here who do
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:04:31PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
On 9/5/06 11:56, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually
customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting
up a transparent proxy just to
Ceri Davies wrote:
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use since the announcement of
FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At
Me Too. At first I thought
On 10/5/06 23:37, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use since the announcement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 11:42:17:
hi,
On 5/9/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
I don't want a chat, I want to know where I can find out how we ended
up with such a terrible logo.
Ceri Davies wrote:
On 10/5/06 23:37, martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font
Bill Moran wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 13:49:20 +
Kep Woof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Take a look at the netbsd logo if you want to see how it's done. It
means something. It's neat. It represents the project. What we (the
users) seem to have ended up with is a fussy and
Hi,
I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and
saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that
I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper,
and not becomming to the enterprise os we know and love. Maybe it was
the best from
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kep Woof
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
Hi,
I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and
saw the new logo. I
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:37:25AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and
saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that
I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper,
That's what it is,
Kep Woof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Interested to hear what people think,
Then take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just flame bait here.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09-May-2006 11:59
Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org
To: cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so is the
font they've started to use since
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use since the announcement of
FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At
Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint.
But if you're trying to sell FreeBSD to a boss or
On 2006-05-09 10:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap,
and so is the font they've started to use since the
announcement of FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At
Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint.
On 9/5/06 11:56, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Semi-seriously, www@: how about offering people a chance to individually
customize that logo away? It's not really THAT important, but setting
up a transparent proxy just to filter that banner out is kind of silly
waste of time.
Specify
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use since the announcement of
FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At
Me Too. At first I thought it was just a
On 9/5/06 10:52, Kep Woof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I guess this is the wrong list, but I just looked at freebsd.org and
saw the new logo. I really think it looks terrible. Everyone that
I've spoken to agrees. It looks like some kind of sextoy/spacehopper,
and not becomming to the
On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've started to use since the announcement of
FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE.
On 5/9/06, michael johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/06 15:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote:
I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so
is the font they've
Hi michael,
Tuesday, May 9, 2006, 10:20:42 PM, you wrote about:
On 5/9/06, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about font overflows but I get the following
http://people.freebsd.org/~ahze/bad-new-icon.png
reload your css files.
Michael
--
Regards,
Daniel Gerzo
48 matches
Mail list logo
