Re: Perl Upgrade And Mailscanner Woes

2011-12-21 Thread Robert Huff
Tim Daneliuk writes: > > Are you sure you are using perl-after-upgrade correctly? You do > > understand that just running: > > > > # perl-after-upgrade > > > > doesn't actually modify anything on disk: instead it shows you what > > needs to be done. To actually effect the change you

Re: Perl Upgrade And Mailscanner Woes

2011-12-21 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 12/21/2011 09:28 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 21/12/2011 14:59, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Almost every time there is a perl upgrade, it manages to break Mailscanner even after running perl-after-upgrade. The solution ends up being a reinstall of Mailscanner, but this is a real pain, because you ha

Re: Perl Upgrade And Mailscanner Woes

2011-12-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/12/2011 14:59, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Almost every time there is a perl upgrade, it manages to break > Mailscanner even after running perl-after-upgrade. The solution > ends up being a reinstall of Mailscanner, but this is a real pain, > because you have to delete and reinstall every dependen

Re: Perl Upgrade And Mailscanner Woes

2011-12-21 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 12/21/2011 03:59 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Almost every time there is a perl upgrade, it manages to break > Mailscanner even after running perl-after-upgrade. The solution > ends up being a reinstall of Mailscanner, but this is a real pain, > because you have to delete and reinstall every depen

Perl Upgrade And Mailscanner Woes

2011-12-21 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Almost every time there is a perl upgrade, it manages to break Mailscanner even after running perl-after-upgrade. The solution ends up being a reinstall of Mailscanner, but this is a real pain, because you have to delete and reinstall every dependent perl package used by Mailscanner. Does anyone