Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-02 Thread Colin Percival
is already up to date. Portsnap builds were offline over the weekend due to a hardware failure, but this is now fixed and portsnap should now be able to update again. Colin Percival ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
needed. Ports tree is already up to date. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Scott I. Remick
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just hopped on here to check to

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Eric Crist
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:43 AMOct 1, 2007, Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is

Re: Ports tree is already up to date.

2007-10-01 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Scott I. Remick wrote: On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Hard to believe that as I have not fetched the updates for the last 2 (or 3) days and there are always a few new or updated ones. Coincidence or the portsnap server is wrong? You're not the only one. I just